(the one time I asked my son to cut the grass he broke the reel mower)
The CC-NC-SA-4.0 license isn't an Open Source Definition compliant license, since it discriminates against a field of use (commercial applications).
https://github.com/ClemensElflein/OpenMower/blob/main/LICENS... https://opensourcedefinition.org/
A reminder, open source means surrendering your monopoly over commercial exploitation:
https://drewdevault.com/2021/01/20/FOSS-is-to-surrender-your...
> Feel free to use the design in your private/educational projects, but don't try to sell the design or products based on it without getting my consent first. The idea here is to share knowledge, not to enable others to simply sell my work. Thank you for understanding.
It's co-opting the term to call it open source.
This has been debated and settled. What people mean by open source or free software has a well agreed upon definition, and this isn't it.
These people are giving you code. You can use it, you just can't compete with them using the tool they made and that they're giving you for free.
The reason people want this last freedom is because they want to compete with the authors using the authors' own hard work. That's really lame.
Open source purism - especially for non-viral MIT and BSD licenses - is how Google and Microsoft and Amazon stole from the commons and turned it against us.
Google Chrome fucked up the web. AWS lifted Redis and Elasticsearch and makes hundreds of millions a quarter on managed versions, whereas the authors see none of that upside.
Or WP Engine, which basically lifted WordPress wholesale and gives absolutely nothing back.
We should all adopt FAIR SOURCE [1].
Fair source prevents people from taking your hard work and competing with you, but it enables your audience and your customers to use your software and modify it without restriction EXCEPT that they can't turn around and sell it in a way that competes with you.
The biggest abusers of open source certainly have a metric horse load of unavailable sources.
I 100% commend CC-BY-SA-NC and other fair source licenses. These are sustainable efforts.
If you're going to use open source, at least make it AGPL / GPLv3 so your contribution doesn't get metabolized into a completely non-free product.
[1] https://fair.io/
14. An IRC-Enabled Lawn Mower (idlerpg.net)
15. OpenMower – An Open Source Lawn Mower (github.com/clemenselflein)
sema4hacker•2h ago
Please mod your mower to automatically pick up litter along road edges, and sell it to Caltrans at dot.ca.gov