These aren't semantic version numbers.
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/-/packages/container/forgejo/ve...
At the very least, a stable "LTS" tag would help.
The significance of Forgejo 13.0 is basically zero. A two-year cadence Debian release is newsworthy. Even if this were an LTS this is still not that interesting (unless there is some other context or significance that I'm not aware of).
Rant over.
https://forgejo.org/docs/v11.0/user/versions/
They use SemVer so there really are Major breaking changes every 3 months by their own definition.
I suppose my assumption was that the software was basically "feature complete" but they must be working hard to add more to it.
But I've since learned that they are in fact using SemVer which means it was my expectations of what the project was trying to do that was mismatched. I didn't expect Major updates to mirror a quarterly cadence.
"Upstream Proposal: Repository Grouping/Subgroups in Forgejo":
https://codeberg.org/fedora/forgejo-deployment/issues/224
"feat: extend Forgejo URL structure from organisation/repository to organisation/project/repository":
https://forgejo.org/2025-10-release-v13-0/#avatar-image-priv...
https://forgejo.org/releases/ says 11 is supported until July 16, 2026.
kstrauser•3mo ago
I saw the links to merged ActivityPub PRs but it wasn't clear to me: what's the status of AP support now?
mindcrash•3mo ago
I believe you can follow the status here (Federation roadmap): https://codeberg.org/forgejo-contrib/federation/src/branch/m...
preya2k•3mo ago