Edit: I was mistaken, confusing coal and petroleum. While petroleum comes from microscopic ocean life, coal forms from the remains of terrestrial plants.
edit: let me elaborate.
My point is that the chemical complexity (manufacturing uses) can be reproduced, and the energy storage density also can be. So really the gift of hydrocarbons under the ground is more that readily available energy is under our feet to help propel us towards higher levels sources of energy. IMO it’s a stepping stone and that’s effectively how humanity is using it.
In fact, it is hard to imagine there would have been enough dead trees to make oil if it were not for the sun.
You could argue (pretty soundly) that oil is just a way of consuming the energy in trees which got that energy from the sun. So oil is just a way of extracting ancient solar energy.
Every voter who votes for lower gas prices is agreeing that it's better to live inside the cruel empire than to build a world without empire
The higher the taxes the lower the price of crude has to be for people to afford it. This means reduced western demand at high prices.
However this doesn't reduce consumption, it just shifts the consumption to the developing world, where there are minimal if any taxes on consumption.
This is true if production levels aren't responsive to prices, but I see no reason that would be the case. Petroleum production levels are known to be quite responsive to upward price movements.
Oil on the other hand is infinite.
If you’ve found a way to escape that arithmetic, I’m all ears.
1: https://www.physicalgold.com/insights/how-much-silver-is-rec...
What interest is served by posting this obviously wrong rhetoric?
It's strange because it's just not one channel but multiple, and the person behind has kept uploading videos during the entire duration of these holidays. So far, he seems to be quite accurate with his predictions. It's been quite informative.
If someone is curious, one of many: https://youtu.be/vBIUZGlNkks
bookofjoe•3h ago
zahlman•1h ago