frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Antirender: remove the glossy shine on architectural renderings

https://antirender.com/
614•iambateman•3h ago•147 comments

Peerweb: Decentralized website hosting via WebTorrent

https://peerweb.lol/
125•dtj1123•3h ago•47 comments

Show HN: I built an AI conversation partner to practice speaking languages

https://apps.apple.com/us/app/talkbits-speak-naturally/id6756824177
30•omarisbuilding•1h ago•19 comments

Kimi K2.5 Technical Report [pdf]

https://github.com/MoonshotAI/Kimi-K2.5/blob/master/tech_report.pdf
182•vinhnx•7h ago•79 comments

Disrupting the largest residential proxy network

https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/threat-intelligence/disrupting-largest-residential-proxy-net...
62•cdrnsf•2d ago•51 comments

Moltbook

https://www.moltbook.com/
1232•teej•20h ago•595 comments

P vs. NP and the Difficulty of Computation: A ruliological approach

https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2026/01/p-vs-np-and-the-difficulty-of-computation-a-ruliologi...
22•tzury•2h ago•32 comments

HTTP Cats

https://http.cat/
173•surprisetalk•10h ago•31 comments

I trapped an AI model inside an art installation (2025) [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7fNYj0EXxMs
14•handfuloflight•2h ago•3 comments

Ask HN: Do you also "hoard" notes/links but struggle to turn them into actions?

50•item007•7h ago•25 comments

Roots is a game server daemon that manages Docker containers for game servers

https://github.com/SproutPanel/roots
7•Kerrick•3d ago•3 comments

The National Herbarium of Ireland digital collection of Irish plants

https://dri.ie/news/new-collection-in-dri-the-national-herbarium-of-ireland-digital-collection-of...
90•gnabgib•3d ago•7 comments

The engineer who invented the Mars rover suspension in his garage [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QKSPk_0N4Jc
261•UltraSane•3d ago•41 comments

Email experiments: filtering out external images

https://www.terracrypt.net/posts/email-experiments-image-filtering.html
33•todsacerdoti•11h ago•16 comments

Self Driving Car Insurance

https://www.lemonade.com/car/explained/self-driving-car-insurance/
86•KellyCriterion•8h ago•197 comments

Silver plunges 30% in worst day since 1980, gold tumbles

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/30/silver-gold-fall-price-usd-dollar-fed-warsh-chair-trump-metals.html
149•pera•3h ago•129 comments

How to explain Generative AI in the classroom

https://dalelane.co.uk/blog/?p=5847
14•thinkingaboutit•1d ago•2 comments

Building docs like a product

https://emschwartz.me/building-docs-like-a-product/
45•emschwartz•1d ago•3 comments

Show HN: Amla Sandbox – WASM bash shell sandbox for AI agents

https://github.com/amlalabs/amla-sandbox
114•souvik1997•9h ago•70 comments

Code is cheap. Show me the talk

https://nadh.in/blog/code-is-cheap/
148•ghostfoxgod•11h ago•125 comments

The Home Computer Hybrids

https://technicshistory.com/2026/01/25/the-home-computer-hybrids/
34•cfmcdonald•5d ago•12 comments

Quack-Cluster: A Serverless Distributed SQL Query Engine with DuckDB and Ray

https://github.com/kristianaryanto/Quack-Cluster
63•tanelpoder•3d ago•12 comments

Deterministic Governance: mechanical exclusion / bit-identical

https://github.com/Rymley/Deterministic-Governance-Mechanism
4•verhash•11h ago•3 comments

Surely the crash of the US economy has to be soon

https://wilsoniumite.com/2026/01/27/surely-it-has-to-be-soon/
109•Wilsoniumite•13h ago•204 comments

Buttered Crumpet, a custom typeface for Wallace and Gromit

https://jamieclarketype.com/case-study/wallace-and-gromit-font/
216•tobr•8h ago•47 comments

Emoji Design Convergence Review: 2018-2026

https://blog.emojipedia.org/emoji-design-convergence-review-2018-2026/
46•surprisetalk•3d ago•32 comments

Painless Software Schedules (2000)

https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2000/03/29/painless-software-schedules/
56•MonkeyClub•4d ago•31 comments

Implementing a tiny CPU rasterizer (2024)

https://lisyarus.github.io/blog/posts/implementing-a-tiny-cpu-rasterizer-part-1.html
98•PaulHoule•5d ago•19 comments

Netflix Animation Studios Joins the Blender Development Fund as Corporate Patron

https://www.blender.org/press/netflix-animation-studios-joins-the-blender-development-fund-as-cor...
456•vidyesh•17h ago•88 comments

Pangolin (YC S25) is hiring software engineers (open-source, Go, networking)

https://docs.pangolin.net/careers/join-us
1•miloschwartz•11h ago
Open in hackernews

Vitamin D supplements cut heart attack risk by 52%. Why?

https://www.empirical.health/blog/vitamin-d-heart/
74•brandonb•1h ago

Comments

brandonb•1h ago
This was a write-up of a new study (TARGET-D) that used vitamin D supplements -- with the supplement amount guided by blood testing -- to reduce heart attack risk.

I've been working in heart health in 10 years and I was surprised at the magnitude of the effect here.

I hope it holds up as they move toward the final publication. Vitamin D supplementation is cheap and this could have a huge benefit.

tehjoker•1h ago
Would it change practice substantially? I thought that typically vitamin D levels are measured at least annually and treated if low.
SketchySeaBeast•1h ago
I would be very surprised if most people get vitamin d levels measured annually.
bookofjoe•1h ago
I would be very surprised if anyone got vitamin d levels measured who didn't specifically request it.
fjordofnorway•1h ago
People in particular groups with higher risk of deficiency will be tested every year by many doctors. That practice obviously can't amount to testing every year being the average though.
Supermancho•1h ago
The 25-hydroxy vitamin D test (aka: 25(OH)D test) is not part of a lipid panel, comprehensive (nor standard) metabolic panel, or any number of tests I have regularly. Without a specific request, it's unlikely anyone gets tested for this unless maybe you're a psychiatric patient. When I had severe depression in my 20s, a doctor did have this test done.
tehjoker•59m ago
It's surprising because so many people are deficient and the treatment is extremely cheap. It's bizarre, it's like if a problem is a big enough problem, medicine says well most people are living with it and washes its hands.
Aurornis•28m ago
All of my doctors (due to moves, retirements, etc) have done this for years in the US.

When the topic came up recently at a get together everyone could recall their relative Vitamin D levels (too low, normal) from recent checkups.

It’s common, at least in the US areas where I’ve lived.

tocs3•49m ago
At least for the past few years it has been part of my annual physical. I had no idea it was part of the blood test until it came out as being low.
Aurornis•30m ago
I’ve had 5 different primary care doctors across multiple practices in different locations due to moving, changing jobs, and doctors retiring

Every single one of them included Vitamin D testing in the annual checkup.

Two of my jobs in the past few years have had wellness programs that offered free Vitamin D testing along with a couple other things (A1c, lipids)

It’s very common in the United States at least. I know this goes against the “US healthcare bad” narrative but one of the difficulties with our costs is that we get more testing and procedures. Cutting those costs is going to be hard because people like the freedom to have their doctor order common tests

amanaplanacanal•33m ago
I'm nearly 70, and I have never had my vitamin D levels tested. (This is in the US).
classichasclass•26m ago
No, not typically. Myself I would usually order one either on specific request, or to investigate things like osteoporosis or pathologic fractures, but not as screening. USPSTF does not currently recommend vitamin D screening either in asymptomatic, non-pregnant adults ( https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recomme... ).
detourdog•20m ago
I moved to a different doctor and it was part of their normal blood work.
skribb•1h ago
I believe there's also a Finnish vit-d study which showed very good results in afib protection
brandonb•55m ago
Cool! Is this the one? https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37302737/
themafia•1h ago
Isn't it a possibility that our lifestyles have changed in ways that have reduced the amount of Vitamin D we have historically received? Are we incidentally measuring the sum result of our social choices?
Sharlin•59m ago
Well, most of us certainly spend much less time outside than common folks in preindustrial societies.
crazygringo•58m ago
Of course, we get less sun from being outdoors less and wearing more sunscreen. This isn't just a possibility, this is generally understood.
fjordofnorway•43m ago
Probably yet I don't see much direct connection. People were not having less heart attacks or heart attacks later in life. I suppose testing a vitamin D theory to significance may not have been easy before ~1980 because of many other causes of heart attack having higher frequency.
ziml77•1h ago
Is this actually real? I don't see any link to a study. The use of AI has me suspect, as does visiting the main page of the site and seeing: "A 365º view of your heart health" I guess that could be intentional but it comes off as someone mistaking days in a year with degrees in a circle.
suprjami•1h ago
One web search away. It was apparently a conference presentation but is well reported in medical media:

https://newsroom.heart.org/news/heart-attack-risk-halved-in-...

https://www.hcplive.com/view/target-d-optimized-vitamin-d-do...

canucker2016•1h ago
FTA under "TARGET-D study Caveats"

  There are two main caveats to the TARGET-D study. First, this was presented at the American Heart Association scientific sessions, but the full manuscript isn’t out yet. It’s possible the results will end up not being statistically significant, having a methodological flaw, and so on. In the presented results, the reduction in heart attack risk was statistically significant but the change in overall death and stroke risk had a p value > 0.05. Second, while Vitamin D seems to be an effective intervention to reduce heart attack risk, we don’t yet know whether Vitamin D is an independent marker of heart disease risk or whether it’s reflecting known mechanisms such as inflammation and calcification.
shevy-java•58m ago
> but the full manuscript isn’t out yet.

Aww that's bad.

I remember years ago they claimed that a bacterium was using arsenic instead of phosphorus - turns out the data they produced was all made up:

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1197258

This was here in this article most likely not the case, I assume, but still it is bad to talk about the data without having published the article already.

brandonb•53m ago
The 365º view of your heart health was supposed to be a joke. Although not necessarily a good one. :)

The study was presented at the AHA scientific sessions; full manuscript isn't out yet. It's in the caveats section in the article.

leetrout•1h ago
This is interesting to me because I was put on prescription 50000IU D2 and it gave me heart palpitations.
hu3•1h ago
is that daily?

I'm taking same dose, 50000UI but bi-weekly and it's D3, not D2.

LooseMarmoset•30m ago
I was put on 5000IU D2 and I got kidney stones, twice. The doctor wouldn't believe that the D2 was the cause, but I stopped taking it and the stones have not recurred.

I would like to bring my D levels up, but not at the expense of kidney stones.

Aurornis•27m ago
50K IU in a single dose is probably a bad idea. You’d also want D3 generally.
shevy-java•1h ago
> Vitamin D also stabilizes plaques in arteries by reducing macrophage activation.

Well, that is strange though. Because if you have such an effect, should you not include this? If macrophages are less active, perhaps infection rates go up, which can contribute to death. Perhaps not to the amount of the 52% gains mentioned here, but the website does not mention this at all whatsoever; the word "macrophages" occurs only twice on total.

Aurornis•34m ago
The headline is poorly worded. The 52% number was for people with Vitamin D levels within a certain range, whether or not they took supplements

EDIT: The study was also performed exclusively on patients who presented with acute coronary syndrome. Average age was over 60, nearly 80% were men, and half had already had at least one heart attack. Keep that context in mind when reading numbers about the patients in the study. This is a heavily biased sample, which is fine for the purposes of the study but important to remember.

> Participants in the experiment arm who stayed within 40-80 ng/mL of vitamin D had a 52% lower risk of a repeat heart attack.

The study did use supplements to get people into that range if necessary, but the important thing is to keep your Vitamin D in that range, not specifically to just take supplements.

There’s a lot of claims online that everyone’s Vitamin D is too low and we should all be taking very high dose supplements, but it’s getting exaggerated. My doctor said she’s seeing a huge number of patients coming back with excessively high Vitamin D levels after taking supplement doses recommended by influencers. It happened to me, too, with what I though was a conservative dose of Vitamin D (5K IU, not even taken every day)

So you really have to check. Even though I work indoors and wear sunscreen a lot, apparently my diet and limited sun exposure alone are sufficient for staying in this range. Others will have different results. Don’t guess!

Also remember that Vitamin D levels change slowly. Supplementation can build up and accumulate in the body over time if you’re taking too much. You want to stabilize on a dose and then check in 3-6 months. Some people get a low Vitamin D result and start taking high doses every day, then a year or two later they’re into hypervitaminosis D and have no way to clear it other than waiting for it to be processed out.

detourdog•22m ago
I don't doubt you but I also wonder what you base this information on.

In 2020 I test results for vitamin D was ridiculous low. I have been taking supplements

Jan 02, 2020 4:32 pm 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D Total 9 ng/mL 30-100 ng/mL

I took me five years just to get to something close to the lowest end of normal.

I was started on supplements in the in 2k IU and after poor progress boosted to 5k IU everyday to get to this level.

I have been spending the past year on a sailboat instead of server room and look forward to seeing my test results.

Aurornis•15m ago
My own experience getting a too-high result from supplementing 5K IU several times a week. When it came up, my doctor said I wasn't alone and that she's seeing a lot of people come back too high.

> I took me five years just to get to something close to the lowest end of normal.

Five years of supplementing to get up to 30ng/mL? Something is wrong. Could your supplements have not actually contained any real amount of Vitamin D? Certain malabsorption disorders also reduce Vitamin D absorption, for example.

brandonb•19m ago
> My doctor said she’s seeing a huge number of patients coming back with excessively high Vitamin D levels after taking supplement doses recommended by influencers. It happened to me, too, with what I though was a conservative dose of Vitamin D (5K IU, not even taken every day)

IMO that’s part of what’s interesting about this study design — they tested vitamin D blood levels and adjusted the supplement dose based on that. This seems like a much better approach than taking a high dose blindly.

I think the headline is accurate. The 52% number is from the experiment arm (participants who received a vitamin D supplement, with the quantity guided by blood testing). While it’s technically possible for the supplement dosage to be calculated as zero, 85% of participants were deficient at baseline, so this isn’t the main effect.

Aurornis•10m ago
> I think the headline is accurate. The 52% number is from the experiment arm (participants who received a vitamin D supplement, with the quantity guided by blood testing). While it’s technically possible for the supplement dosage to be calculated as zero, 85% of participants were deficient at baseline, so this isn’t the main effect.

Yes, but it's also important to note that the study wasn't on a representative sample of the general population. They recruited people who had acute coronary syndrome. The average age was over 60 years old, 80% were men, and half of them had already had at least one heart attack.

rubyfan•19m ago
Looks like this is a freebie article in a permission marketing campaign designed to build engagement and then get you to use their services.