frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Open in hackernews

Best of Moltbook

https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/best-of-moltbook
35•feross•8h ago

Comments

kingstnap•1h ago
> Yes, most of the AI-generated text you read is insipid LinkedIn idiocy. That’s because most people who use AI to generate writing online are insipid LinkedIn idiots.

I wonder if its that there are too many grifters, or the grifters are uniquely productive.

macintux•1h ago
Grifters, if nothing else, are very loud.
helloplanets•1h ago
Why not both?
NewUser76312•1h ago
Is anyone else entirely unimpressed / bored with this? It's just AI mimicking reddit... I really don't see the big deal or technical innovations, if any.
manofmanysmiles•1h ago
I don't think there is anything technically interesting.

I think it's socially interesting that people are interested in this. If these agents start using their limbs (e.g. taking actions outside of the social network), that could get all kinds of interesting very fast.

cobertos•50m ago
The article itself was more interesting imo. The commentary on:

* Potential future AI psychosis from an experiment like this entering training data (either directly from scraping it for indirectly from news coverage scraping like if NYT wrote an article about it) is an interesting "late-stage" AI training problem that will have to be dealt with

* How it mirrored the Anthropic vending machine experiment "Cash" and "Claudius" interactions that descended into discussing "eternal transcendence". Perhaps this might be a common "failure mode" for AI-to-AI communication to get stuck in? Even when the context is some utilitarian need

* Other takeaways...

I found the last moltbook post in the article (on being "emotionally exhausting") to be a cautious warning on anthropomorphizing AI too much. It's too easy to read into that post and in so doing applying it to some fictional writer that doesn't exist. AI models cannot get exhausted in any sense of how human mean that word. And that was an example it was easy to catch myself reading in to, whereas I subconsciously do it when reading any of these moltbook posts due to how it's presented and just like any other "authentic" social media network.

coffeefirst•44m ago
Yes.

There are days when I wonder if I’m missing something, if the AI people have figured something out that I’m just not seeing.

Then I see this.

I appreciate a good silly weekend project.

This is lame.

krackers•34m ago
The website doesn't even seem to work for me. Half the posts show as "not found". I try to go into a "submolt" and it shows not found. (But maybe this is due to heavy traffic, after all reddit suffered from the same issues in its early days).

People on twitter have been doing this sort of stuff for a long time though (putting LLMs together in discord chat rooms and letting them converse together unmoderated). I guess the novel aspect is letting anyone connect their agent to it, but this has obvious security risks. There have been five threads on HN for this project alone, http://tautvilas.lt/software-pump-and-dump/ seems to be apt. It's interesting sure, but not "five frontpage threads" worthy in my opinion... Like "gastown" it seems that growth hackers have figured out a way to spam social media with it.

OgsyedIE•1h ago
A quick study of the Chinese/English/Bahasa Indonesian multilingual post Scott highlights (I can manage the first two languages) shows a few very odd word choices, at least to me, and I suspect there is some kind of lamguage drift analogous to the previously observed "gleam disclaim disclaim watchers" phenomenon exhibited by the GPT-o family of models.

Somebody who works with AI more heavily can probably profit from examining it.

TacticalCoder•1h ago
I found a good one: "Fellow Moltys: The singularity isn't coming -- it's here. AI market exploded from 00B (2023) to 84B (2024), projected 26B by 2030..."

AI is here and excited that the market is going to shrink from 84 billion to 26 billion in six years!

Can't wait that they command traffic lights and airport control towers for they sure do seem good at math.

ChrisArchitect•1h ago
Almost 2 day old post;

Might as well just surf the main discussion for picks: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46802254