Maybe it's just me, but if I were in such a suboptimal defensive materiel position, I would try diplomacy first. In fact, I would make it my mission to be the world recognized leader in diplomacy.
And their policy of overlooking violence against the previous inhabitants. Genocide slow burn.
So I don’t know what good any diplomacy could have been in that context.
> Iran and Israel have maintained no diplomatic relations since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, and their relationship has been characterized by hostility ever since.
I think we are fast approaching an era where weapons of mass destruction, by way of cheap killbot swarms, are trivially accessible to any government. Without radical diplomacy, I fear the entire Middle East -- Israel included -- is on a path to annihilation.
Live by the sword, die by the sword. Old advice that continues to ring true.
The best way to prevent terrorism is to not give people reasons to want you dead.
Look at all the ethnic conflicts in the world. Like the troubles in Ireland. Did that stop because one side threw more bombs? No, it stopped because both sides agreed to talk.
Instead, we frequently see it from dictators with a delusion of grandeur.
So it seems strange to use this as an argument to defend Iran. Bad faith, even.
As for diplomacy: Iran signs treaties ... then just refuses to uphold them. For example, Iran signed, then pretty openly violated it's nuclear non-proliferation treaty obligations [2], same with the famous nuclear deal.
But, even where it comes to pretty basic things: Iran signed the human rights treaties, including the Geneva convention, and hangs gays and minors as a matter of course (according to amnesty #1 worldwide with hundreds of minors executed, and actually increasing the rate over time), attacks religious minorities, women, the government has a side business in kidnapping foreignors ...
Or other treaties. Iran signed freedom of navigation treaties, and has for decades violated them. Hell, Iran violates the international telecommunications union treaty.
The problem: Iran cannot be negotiated with, for the simple reason that they do not respect deals they make. There's no point in negotiating since their behavior does not change when they make deals. They make promises, and ignore them. They sign treaties, and boast openly about violating them.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_diplomat_terror_plot_t...
[2] https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/25/06/gov2025-38.pd...
Its hard to negotiate with Iran when Israel keeps killing their negotiators.
That's what your logic sounds like
https://www.jpost.com/defense-and-tech/article-889435
Iran is actually attacking their former close friends at the gulf uninvolved civilian population centers more often than it attacks Israel
EDIT: fixed to 92%
The logic seems very straight forward imho. Attack the US army bases and pester the nations that allows those bases in hopes that they might ask the us to get bend.
If only they attacked the American bases as opposed to also attacking civilian infrastructure such as oil facilities and residential neighborhoods
If only they had skipped gulf countries who had pushed the US not to strike and refused to let the US use their bases to attack Iran (all of them)
If only they hadn't attacked countries without any bases such as Azerbaijan
Then I think your arguments would have had more merit
Next time all the gulf countries will know: get America and everyone else to launch attacks against Iran from your soil. Make sure to participate. Why? Iran will attack everyone regardless of alliances, who attacks, whether anyone attacks at all, what bases exist, whether or not they participate, or whether they avoid hostilities. So obviously, it's better to be part of the hostilities against Iran, to have an army on your soil that will protect at least some of your territory.
thisislife2•1h ago
XorNot•1h ago
The map of countries which sign the convention against landmines is extremely obvious in that context.
markdown•1h ago
No such country exists. So long as enemies are likely to put boots, wheels, or tracks on the ground in your country, landmines are extremely useful, extremely cheap, and extremely effective.
cpgxiii•1h ago
breppp•1h ago
spwa4•1h ago
Iran signed the human rights treaties ... and openly executes gays and minors. They boast about this publicly.
Qem•1h ago
Estimated around 4 million of them against south Lebanon:
https://imeu.org/resources/key-issues/quick-facts-israels-il...
https://www.hrw.org/report/2008/02/16/flooding-south-lebanon...