This is one of the most loaded poll questions I've ever seen. Even if you're very pro worker and anti-AI, I can't see how his poll result is useful outside of generating clickbait headlines.
(A) Government programs that redistribute resources to workers displaced by AI, potentially reducing efficiency and slowing innovation, or
(B) Policies that enable American tech companies to rapidly innovate and ensure U.S. leadership in AI.
After the results of that poll, we can write a new article titled:
Americans Recognize AI as a Catalyst for Broad-Based Prosperity and Economic Advancement
What kind of biased poll is that? I'm surprised only 60% agreed with that.
> A majority of people, 55% of all those surveyed, supported the statement “tech companies should not be able to make unlimited profits from AI and should be held financially responsible for American jobs that AI eliminates.
HoldOnAMinute•1h ago
idle_zealot•1h ago
That's how putting your savings into the market is sold, and it's true to an extent; you will lose out if you let your money sit around. But also, having a bunch of inattentive and unsavvy investors in the market is super convenient to anyone with a whole lot wealth. It means when the market crashes there's a cushion made up of your retirement savings. Plus, they have the option of buying low and increasing their share of the market. If you put all your money in an ETF for the long haul, you end up with a smaller share of the pie.
That's what really matters, right? Not absolute wealth, but spending power relative to other people around you. If the mechanics of the stock market increase this gap, even when people are bought in, I don't think that "enjoying the fruits of their labors" is the right framing.
thegreatpeter•49m ago