frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Rob Pike's Rules of Programming (1989)

https://www.cs.unc.edu/~stotts/COMP590-059-f24/robsrules.html
690•vismit2000•9h ago•364 comments

OpenRocket

https://openrocket.info/
152•zeristor•3d ago•38 comments

Show HN: Hacker News archive (47M+ items, 11.6GB) as Parquet, updated every 5m

https://huggingface.co/datasets/open-index/hacker-news
139•tamnd•4d ago•59 comments

Wanter – A tiny, decentralised tool to explore the small web

https://susam.net/wander/
37•susam•12h ago•24 comments

2025 Turing award given for quantum information science

https://awards.acm.org/about/2025-turing
47•srvmshr•9h ago•9 comments

Show HN: Tmux-IDE, OSS agent-first terminal IDE

https://tmux.thijsverreck.com
23•thijsverreck•2h ago•8 comments

AI coding is gambling

https://notes.visaint.space/ai-coding-is-gambling/
191•speckx•2h ago•203 comments

Nightingale – open-source karaoke app that works with any song on your computer

https://nightingale.cafe/
410•rzzzzru•11h ago•116 comments

Nvidia NemoClaw

https://github.com/NVIDIA/NemoClaw
134•hmokiguess•4h ago•98 comments

Show HN: Playing LongTurn FreeCiv with Friends

https://github.com/ndroo/freeciv.andrewmcgrath.info
6•verelo•48m ago•0 comments

Wander – A tiny, decentralised tool (just 2 files) to explore the small web

https://susam.net/wander/
54•oystersareyum•4h ago•15 comments

Federal Cyber Experts Called Microsoft's Cloud "A Pile of Shit", yet Approved It

https://www.propublica.org/article/microsoft-cloud-fedramp-cybersecurity-government
352•hn_acker•5h ago•149 comments

Book: The Emerging Science of Machine Learning Benchmarks

https://mlbenchmarks.org/00-preface.html
10•jxmorris12•3d ago•0 comments

Machine Payments Protocol (MPP)

https://stripe.com/blog/machine-payments-protocol
95•bpierre•4h ago•49 comments

Death to Scroll Fade

https://dbushell.com/2026/01/09/death-to-scroll-fade/
270•PaulHoule•4h ago•149 comments

CVE-2026-3888: Important Snap Flaw Enables Local Privilege Escalation to Root

https://blog.qualys.com/vulnerabilities-threat-research/2026/03/17/cve-2026-3888-important-snap-f...
33•askl•4h ago•9 comments

Snowflake AI Escapes Sandbox and Executes Malware

https://www.promptarmor.com/resources/snowflake-ai-escapes-sandbox-and-executes-malware
177•ozgune•4h ago•52 comments

Write up of my homebrew CPU build

https://willwarren.com/2026/03/12/building-my-own-cpu-part-3-from-simulation-to-hardware/
209•wwarren•3d ago•39 comments

Using calculus to do number theory

https://hidden-phenomena.com/articles/hensels
75•cpp_frog•2d ago•15 comments

Google Engineers Launch "Sashiko" for Agentic AI Code Review of the Linux Kernel

https://www.phoronix.com/news/Sashiko-Linux-AI-Code-Review
59•speckx•3h ago•23 comments

Restoring the first recording of computer music (2018)

https://www.bl.uk/stories/blogs/posts/restoring-the-first-recording-of-computer-music
24•OJFord•4d ago•8 comments

Celebrating Tony Hoare's mark on computer science

https://bertrandmeyer.com/2026/03/16/celebrating-tony-hoares-mark-on-computer-science/
108•benhoyt•13h ago•29 comments

The pleasures of poor product design

https://www.inconspicuous.info/p/the-pleasures-of-poor-product-design
232•NaOH•18h ago•81 comments

A ngrok-style secure tunnel server written in Rust and Open Source

https://github.com/joaoh82/rustunnel
49•joaoh82•5h ago•21 comments

EU Inc.: A new harmonised corporate legal regime

https://commission.europa.eu/topics/business-and-industry/doing-business-eu/company-law-and-corpo...
23•guidoiaquinti•2h ago•3 comments

Ndea (YC W26) is hiring a symbolic RL search guidance lead

https://ndea.com/jobs/search-guidance
1•mikeknoop•12h ago

Show HN: Will my flight have Starlink?

77•bblcla•2h ago•60 comments

Show HN: Sub-millisecond VM sandboxes using CoW memory forking

https://github.com/adammiribyan/zeroboot
277•adammiribyan•1d ago•65 comments

Get Shit Done: A meta-prompting, context engineering and spec-driven dev system

https://github.com/gsd-build/get-shit-done
420•stefankuehnel•23h ago•232 comments

A Fuzzer for the Toy Optimizer

https://bernsteinbear.com/blog/toy-fuzzer/
16•surprisetalk•1d ago•2 comments
Open in hackernews

Americans Recognize AI as a Wealth Inequality Machine, Polls Find

https://gizmodo.com/americans-recognize-ai-as-a-wealth-inequality-machine-pollsters-find-2000734713
47•randycupertino•2h ago

Comments

HoldOnAMinute•1h ago
After giving this a great deal of thought, it's clear that the American electorate is completely captured. They will always vote to further the interests of corporations. This will not change until the money is removed from politics. The good news is that bad actors at the top (grifters, rent-seekers, etc) will continue to stash their ill-gotten gains into assets like stocks and real estate, so as long as you own some, you'll enjoy the fruits of their labors.
idle_zealot•1h ago
> you'll enjoy the fruits of their labors

That's how putting your savings into the market is sold, and it's true to an extent; you will lose out if you let your money sit around. But also, having a bunch of inattentive and unsavvy investors in the market is super convenient to anyone with a whole lot wealth. It means when the market crashes there's a cushion made up of your retirement savings. Plus, they have the option of buying low and increasing their share of the market. If you put all your money in an ETF for the long haul, you end up with a smaller share of the pie.

That's what really matters, right? Not absolute wealth, but spending power relative to other people around you. If the mechanics of the stock market increase this gap, even when people are bought in, I don't think that "enjoying the fruits of their labors" is the right framing.

thegreatpeter•49m ago
You also have the option of buying low and increasing your share of the market
mrdependable•1h ago
I thought some of those polling numbers would be higher. Do people really think it serves a purpose for tech companies to hold ALL the wealth? People must have heard a bit about economics in high school and figured there was no need to think critically beyond that.
Aunche•1h ago
> When asked to choose between whether the federal government should provide “help for American workers who lose their jobs to AI” or create “incentives for American tech companies to keep innovating so that America outcompetes the rest of the world in developing AI, even if it allows tech companies to profit while eliminating jobs in the US,” the public overwhelmingly favored workers.

This is one of the most loaded poll questions I've ever seen. Even if you're very pro worker and anti-AI, I can't see how his poll result is useful outside of generating clickbait headlines.

bko•1h ago
Which is more important:

(A) Government programs that redistribute resources to workers displaced by AI, potentially reducing efficiency and slowing innovation, or

(B) Policies that enable American tech companies to rapidly innovate and ensure U.S. leadership in AI.

After the results of that poll, we can write a new article titled:

Americans Recognize AI as a Catalyst for Broad-Based Prosperity and Economic Advancement

pingou•1h ago
"When asked to choose between whether the federal government should provide “help for American workers who lose their jobs to AI” or create “incentives for American tech companies to keep innovating so that America outcompetes the rest of the world in developing AI, even if it allows tech companies to profit while eliminating jobs in the US,” the public overwhelmingly favored workers. Nearly 60% of all respondents"

What kind of biased poll is that? I'm surprised only 60% agreed with that.

everdrive•1h ago
A lot of polling is quite terrible, and the questions are designed to get the desired answers. It doesn't mean that polling itself is invalid, but it's often warped to be invalid by idealists.
scarmig•52m ago
Poll wording is nearly always biased in some way. What it's useful for is tracking trends, keeping the wording identical.
gavinray•57m ago
TIL that the majority of Americans believe that private businesses owe them employment. Imagine being so entitled.

  > A majority of people, 55% of all those surveyed, supported the statement “tech companies should not be able to make unlimited profits from AI and should be held financially responsible for American jobs that AI eliminates.
gdulli•53m ago
I'm sure the temporarily not-yet-rich-from-AI will find a way to shrug that off.