frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

TurboQuant: Redefining AI efficiency with extreme compression

https://research.google/blog/turboquant-redefining-ai-efficiency-with-extreme-compression/
75•ray__•2h ago•5 comments

VitruvianOS – Desktop Linux Inspired by the BeOS

https://v-os.dev
82•felixding•3h ago•35 comments

Flighty Airports

https://flighty.com/airports
259•skogstokig•6h ago•82 comments

Goodbye to Sora

https://twitter.com/soraofficialapp/status/2036532795984715896
618•mikeocool•11h ago•443 comments

Show HN: I took back Video.js after 16 years and we rewrote it to be 88% smaller

https://videojs.org/blog/videojs-v10-beta-hello-world-again
333•Heff•13h ago•59 comments

I wanted to build vertical SaaS for pest control, so I took a technician job

https://www.onhand.pro/p/i-wanted-to-build-vertical-saas-for-pest-control-i-took-a-technician-job...
263•tezclarke•9h ago•114 comments

Apple Business

https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2026/03/introducing-apple-business-a-new-all-in-one-platform-for-b...
597•soheilpro•15h ago•345 comments

Tell HN: Litellm 1.82.7 and 1.82.8 on PyPI are compromised

https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm/issues/24512
611•dot_treo•19h ago•407 comments

Arm AGI CPU

https://newsroom.arm.com/blog/introducing-arm-agi-cpu
321•RealityVoid•13h ago•243 comments

Social media bans and digital curfews to be trialled on UK teenagers

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn89g3ngkyzo
14•1659447091•2h ago•26 comments

You can run a DNS server (2025)

https://simonsafar.com/2025/running_dns/
45•surprisetalk•4d ago•18 comments

Show HN: DuckDB community extension for prefiltered HNSW using ACORN-1

https://github.com/cigrainger/duckdb-hnsw-acorn
29•cigrainger•3h ago•1 comments

Implementing automatic eSIM installation on Android

https://medium.com/proandroiddev/integration-of-automatic-esim-installation-on-android-6c5f6d7124cb
17•nesterenkopavel•1h ago•0 comments

Fun with CSF firmware (RK3588 GPU firmware)

https://icecream95.gitlab.io/fun-with-csf-firmware.html
9•M95D•3d ago•0 comments

Intel Device Modeling Language for virtual platforms

https://github.com/intel/device-modeling-language
22•transpute•3d ago•0 comments

Why did the chicken cross the road?

https://taylor.town/other-side
14•surprisetalk•18h ago•2 comments

Algorithm Visualizer

https://algorithm-visualizer.org/
68•vinhnx•4d ago•3 comments

An Aural Companion for Decades, CBS News Radio Crackles to a Close

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/21/business/media/cbs-news-radio-appraisal.html
49•tintinnabula•3d ago•11 comments

Show HN: Email.md – Markdown to responsive, email-safe HTML

https://www.emailmd.dev/
262•dancablam•14h ago•60 comments

The final switch: Goldsboro, 1961

https://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2013/09/27/final-switch-goldsboro-1961/
8•1970-01-01•3d ago•1 comments

Wine 11 rewrites how Linux runs Windows games at kernel with massive speed gains

https://www.xda-developers.com/wine-11-rewrites-linux-runs-windows-games-speed-gains/
830•felineflock•12h ago•285 comments

Meta ordered to pay $375M in New Mexico trial over child exploitation

https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/jury-orders-meta-pay-375-mln-new-...
67•gostsamo•3h ago•25 comments

A Compiler Writing Journey

https://github.com/DoctorWkt/acwj
62•ibobev•7h ago•4 comments

What happened to GEM?

https://dfarq.homeip.net/whatever-happened-to-gem/
67•naves•4d ago•30 comments

Hypura – A storage-tier-aware LLM inference scheduler for Apple Silicon

https://github.com/t8/hypura
197•tatef•15h ago•75 comments

Show HN: Gemini can now natively embed video, so I built sub-second video search

https://github.com/ssrajadh/sentrysearch
301•sohamrj•16h ago•83 comments

Hypothesis, Antithesis, synthesis

https://antithesis.com/blog/2026/hegel/
242•alpaylan•15h ago•83 comments

Missile defense is NP-complete

https://smu160.github.io/posts/missile-defense-is-np-complete/
314•O3marchnative•18h ago•315 comments

Epoch confirms GPT5.4 Pro solved a frontier math open problem

https://epoch.ai/frontiermath/open-problems/ramsey-hypergraphs
442•in-silico•1d ago•644 comments

How the world’s first electric grid was built

https://worksinprogress.co/issue/how-the-worlds-first-electric-grid-was-built/
78•zdw•4d ago•22 comments
Open in hackernews

Miscellanea: The War in Iran

https://acoup.blog/2026/03/25/miscellanea-the-war-in-iran/
60•decimalenough•2h ago

Comments

tobiasdorge•1h ago
A comment on this post by aerodog calling Bret a "Jew" for calling the Iranian government odious was the first comment on this post but was either removed by them or a mod. Would be good to keep up so that people can see these clowns.
lostlogin•1h ago
User > showdead
pocksuppet•31m ago
Everyone should have this option turned on.
bigyabai•14m ago
As someone with it on, I'm very glad off is the default.
manfromchina1•1h ago
> More relevantly for us, Iran is 3.5 times larger than Iraq and roughly twice the population.

Worth noting that at the time of invasion of Iraq they had about 25 million people per gemeni. They now have about 46 mil people per wikipedia. All else equal, we are comparing 25 mil to 93 mil and not half of 93 mil to 93 mil.

3eb7988a1663•21m ago
Excellent catch.

I also used this as an opportunity to reference the now archived[0] CIA Factbook[1] which does put the 2003 Iraq population at 25 million.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47114530

[1] https://worldfactbookarchive.org/archive/2003/IZ

bawolff•1h ago
> And I do want to stress that. There is a frequent mistake, often from folks who deal in economics, to assume that countries will give up on wars when the economics turn bad. But countries are often very willing to throw good money after bad even on distant wars of choice.

On the other hand isn't this how the russian revolution happened? An economic crisis due to a prolonged war leading to a revolution? While i wouldn't bet money on it, it seems at least possible that something similar could happen to Iran.

gostsamo•53m ago
Actually, there are lots of revolutions in Europe after WWI, but keep in mind that in this case the populations were blaming their governments for starting or participating in an unnecessary war with monumental casualties. In this case, the Iran government has two useful scapegoats and any casualties could be easily ascribed to the idiots bombing girl schools and not to the idiots sending millions to their deaths under artillery fire.
GolfPopper•39m ago
I would not wager money on a revolution coming from this war, either. But if a revolution does come as a result of the war, it seems at least as likely to be in the United States as in Iran.
ivan_gammel•37m ago
>On the other hand isn't this how the russian revolution happened?

It happened because Russian empire (and German empire) lacked state security apparatus adequate to the threat. It was fixed by most authoritarian states after that, so e.g. Soviet Union survived for 70 years despite many popular uprisings, which happened almost the whole time of its existence. It went down only when elites in Moscow destroyed it from within.

Hikikomori•23m ago
Are we talking about Iran or US?
krige•15m ago
While I agree that a revolution in Iran is not impossible, I rather doubt that whoever comes next will be western friendly and moderate; after the indscriminate military action of the past few weeks they are probably more likely to get ayatollah'd again.
yanhangyhy•1h ago
The reason for the Iran war is very simple: Israel’s instigation, a potential strike against China, and Trump’s political immaturity.
Synaesthesia•57m ago
The purpose of the war is to destroy the Axis of Resistance, Iran, Hezbollah and its allies, the only force standing in the way of US/Israeli hegemony in the region.
george916a•54m ago
Reason for Iran war is a fanatic Shiite regime on the verge of obtaining nuclear weapons. Same regime that vowed time after time to erase Israel. 100% justified war. Should’ve been done earlier in fact.
unmole•44m ago
> on the verge of obtaining nuclear weapons.

WMD 2.0 The Electric Boogaloo.

kenjinp•43m ago
This comment is simply not true from a US national interest perspective. The article explains why this was not done earlier.
GolfPopper•36m ago
>on the verge of obtaining nuclear weapons

I've been hearing that line, from the same person for thirty years:

https://www.news18.com/world/weeks-away-by-next-spring-video...

energy123•16m ago
Because Iran has been repeatedly stopped from doing it through cyber (stuxnet), sanctions, assassinations of nuclear scientists, and bombings.

Israel said the same thing about Pakistan many decades ago, and they were the only country trying to stop it from happening, but they were blocked from doing so.

That's the only reason we don't hear "Pakistan has been weeks away from a nuke for 30 years" in these annoyingly ignorant internet discussions.

I find it so puzzling that a country, which has violated the NPT multiple times, can enrich uranium to 60%, according to the IAEA, inside bunkers deep within mountains, and people with a straight face can say that they're not building a nuclear weapon. I think less of these people's basic intellectual integrity. Just go ahead and say that the theocrats in Iran should be allowed to have a nuke, be honest for once.

socraticnoise•32m ago
Isn't it interesting that the country that takes the nuclear threat most seriously and tries to prevent it is also the only country that has ever used nuclear weapons?
defrost•22m ago
Russia? France? The UK? India? Pakistan? Israel? China?

There are many countries that have used nuclear weapons.

If you're talking about the USofA they didn't try that hard at preventing Iran from enriching - they tore up a perfectly good and well functioning monitoring agreement at the start of Trump's first term.

Hikikomori•21m ago
When Trump left the agreement Obama made with Iran all US intelligence agencies agreed that Iran was not working on a bomb. Netanyahu has screeched about Irans destruction for 40 years, he was there to lie to congress about WMDs in Iraq. This conflict is engineered.
Synaesthesia•57m ago
He writes that the region is not very important to the USA. It's not, but it is a strategically important area, not only in terms of its location, at the nexus of Asia, Africa and Europe, but also because of the oil there.

Now the US is not dependent on Middle Eastern Oil, but Japan, China and other countries are. So controlling the region will mean a lever of power over those regions.

fruit2020•33m ago
So it’s not about nuclear weapons?
yanhangyhy•27m ago
its always oil and 'freedom'
bluealienpie•19m ago
It was never about nuclear weapons, Netanyahu has been saying Iran was one week away for over 30 years. Europe goes along as an excuse to support politically unpopular war to maintain US support for Ukraine.
fruit2020•10m ago
What would you expect Europe to do? It’s not like they openly support this war. The Iranian diaspora supports it, there is the secularism element, but the US doesn’t care about the Iranian people anyway
decimalenough•4m ago
The diaspora is happy about the regime being targeted. They will be much, much more ambivalent if the US starts targeting power infrastructure and innocent people in hospitals etc start dying en masse.
avereveard•52m ago
It seems there's a flawed reading coming from a single point in time analysis

Region instability had ben regularly threatening freedom of navigation in the last five years

And USA may not consider the individual country strategic, but cares deeply about freedom of navigation, because the single market is basically the pillar for their hegemony.

Sarah Paine lectures give overall better lenses to look at this engagement.

decimalenough•13m ago
As the article discusses in detail, if the US actually cares about freedom of navigation, the war was a massive own goal because it looks extremely likely to grant the current Iranian regime de facto control of the Strait.
georgemcbay•49m ago
> Please understand me: the people in these countries are not important, but as a matter of national strategy, some places are more important than others.

I assume/hope this was meant to say "the people in these countries are not [un]important"? (or just "are important")

As an entirely secular person, I believe every innocent human life is important.

lmm•43m ago
He's speaking from a military, America-first perspective (which I suspect may be somewhat affected, because he is hoping to convince people who sincerely think that way). The people in these countries are not strategically important.
righthand•44m ago
> They did not and now we are all living trapped in the consequences.

They (rich and well connected) did, but they won't have to suffer the consequences, everyone else will. The Pedo of the United States is now a billionaire that will walk away in 4 years shrugging his shoulders laughing all the way to the bank with them.

Not one person that could stop it, did stop it. Legislature is sitting on their thumbs pretending not to work for Israel and selling us out to big tech and defense spending.

All the Baby Boomers are in the south enjoying the sunshine and shrugging their shoulders.

underdeserver•36m ago
I don't understand what this article has to do with Hacker News.

> for the United States this war was an unwise gamble on extremely long odds; the gamble (that the regime would collapse swiftly) has already failed

Right off the bat this guy is wrong. Nobody in their right mind would bet that the regime would collapse swiftly. The US knew what Iran's military C&C looks like, and what their internal oppressive police forces look like.

The US and Israel have been pummeling them continuously, and they're not done. So much so that the one opposition leader all the Iranians in exile are talking about urged Iranians to stay home and not protest - yet.

pocksuppet•33m ago
> I don't understand what this article has to do with Hacker News.

The continuing slow collapse of the United States is extremely relevant to all things technology and business. The source of all our funding may be cut off. It's important to monitor what's going on there.

Sniffnoy•33m ago
> Right off the bat this guy is wrong. Nobody in their right mind would bet that the regime would collapse swiftly.

That "nobody in their right mind" would bet this does not, in fact, contradict his assertion that somebody did!

ggm•30m ago
Right off the bat your response raises questions because if the US leadership knew from day one this was a protracted fight then they stand having made entirely contradictory statements regarding their intent and expectations in that regard.
Hikikomori•26m ago
Lying is second nature to them.
nowaytheydid•20m ago
> then they stand having made entirely contradictory statements regarding their intent and expectations in that regard

Time Traveler, rushing to a computer after seeing a Skyrim for Sale poster and seeing this post: "WHAT YEAR IS IT!!!??"

ajewhere•19m ago
I stll dont understand what you are doing 10000 miles away from the presumed borders of your country, and even more why on earth you think you have the right to dictate to 90 million people (let aside the rest of the world) how to govetn themselves.

I suppose it is some right given to you from above, now where have I seen this before..

bigyabai•18m ago
> I don't understand what this article has to do with Hacker News.

Judging by your comment history it seems to be the majority of what you discuss. Maybe you're not the best judge of what HN finds interesting or salient.

shubhamjain•15m ago
I always wondered what alternative reality are people supporting the administration are living in and this right here is the answer. As someone put it, Americans love to fool themselves in believing they are the ones 'winning' because they killed more people even if it means completely failing at the original objective.
khhu2bnn•33m ago
The amazing part to me is just the perceived invincibility this small circle within the US administration has. You can find dozens of articles with a search limited to Feb 1~Feb 27, plenty of analysis warning of the risks that have now become reality, everything - the strait, no revolution, further radicalization, critically low US stockpiles, abandoning other US partners, gulf destabilization, etc.

In the fantasy imagination of some people, they really think you can take out some military targets of another country and then the oppressed masses will magically revolt, as they completely ignore the failed revolution just a month prior. Surround yourself with enough of these people while excluding and firing those who don't and this is what you get.

pm90•22m ago
Its what happens when you surround yourself with incompetent yes men.
scott_w•13m ago
Honestly, the way this administration has behaved makes me think someone there is obsessed with playing Total War and thinks that’s how the real world works. It’s all about winning battles and painting the map red, white and blue (Greenland, Venezuela, now Iran) with no thought to what they want to achieve beyond that.
3eb7988a1663•11m ago
Don't forget prior saber rattling about Panama. Cuba is still actively on deck.
Hikikomori•9m ago
They're obsessed with what real white men did the in past centuries, ie old style imperialism, not the current US state of imperialism.
littlecranky67•21m ago
Not a single mention of the 15.000-40.000 thousand (depending on which sources you believe) massacred unarmed protestors killed 8 weeks ago by that regime.
krige•18m ago
As a consolation prize we can mention the unknown amount of unarmed civillians bombed by US+Israel forces instead.
scott_w•18m ago
Then I’d suggest you read the article because he absolutely mentions it, twice in fact.
bluealienpie•17m ago
Nor the hundreds of thousands murder by Israel in a genocide, which is why his strategic analysis doesn't see the gulf states are at risk of collapse if they engage Iran on what is perceived to be on Israel's behalf.
ardit33•8m ago
Did you even read it? He mentions that, and also He says that the regime is 'odious' right in the beginning, and is looking more from the US self interest and strategic perspective.

"It certainly did not help that the United States had stood idle while the regime slaughtered tens of thousands of its opponents, before making the attempt,"

"Now, before we go forward, I want to clarify a few things. First, none of this is a defense of the Iranian regime, which is odious. That said, there are many odious regimes in the world and we do not go to war with all of them. Second, this is a post fundamentally about American strategy or the lack thereof and thus not a post"

hackandthink•13m ago
That all makes a lot of sense. Mr. Devereux is being more realistic this time than he was at the start of the war in Ukraine.

My takeaway from the war in Ukraine is: it’s going to get worse and last longer than anyone ever imagined.

wecwecwe•11m ago
Bret mocks the JCPOA, but the west found a way to work with the Kingdom of Consanguinity and Public Executions. What gives?
D_Alex•4m ago
>Iran would have to respond and thus would have to try to find a way to inflict ‘pain’ on the United States to force the United States to back off. But whereas Israel is in reach of some Iranian weapons, the United States is not.

This is too complacent for my liking. Every rusty trawler is a viable launch platform for Shahed type drones (operational range ~2500 km per Wikipedia). Nearly every US oil refinery and LNG terminal are on the coast. And then there are floating oil platforms (e.g.: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perdido_(oil_platform))

The article then says:

>One can never know how well prepared an enemy is for something.

And:

>And if I can reason this out, Iran – which has been planning for this exact thing for forty years certainly can.

I'll leave it here for y'all to ponder.