https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caedite_eos._Novit_enim_Dominu....
— A spooky ghost
WooooooOOOOOOOOooooooooOOOOOOOOOoooooo-
- A less spooky ghost
Is HN more botted, or less? And are banned accounts excluded?
For example, take a look at just about any stock chart (try https://www.google.com/finance/beta/quote/GOOG:NASDAQ?hl=en). There's actual money on the line, but no baseline. Why do you think that is?
Visually, this is vastly exaggerating the variation. Actual usage did not even double.
No, it is literally showing the exact variation of interest. If you think it's exaggerating the variation, you are not reading the chart. You are glancing at the chart, ignoring what it actually says in multiple ways, and imagining it has a baseline of zero, when it clearly does not.
Read the chart. What does it actually say?
Maybe if you are looking at it in a monospaced environment like the HN edit window; rendered in a proportional font, hyphens, en-dashes, and em-dashes are quite distinct from eachother.
> It's no surprise humans barely use them. Then why did it get picked up so much by AIs?
It got picked up by AIs because their training corpus includes plenty of professionally published work, not just informal, off-the-cuff communication, and professionally published work uses typographic dashes (em-dashes, en-dashes, and even 2-em- and 3-em-dashes) extensively. (3-em less so in newer works, it having, e.g., dropped out of the recommendations of the Chicago Manual of Style as of 2024.)
Like, I could see some people noticing that the book they're reading has dashes that are a bit longer than normal, but what made you think "That must be it's own thing, separate from a normal dash" as opposed to something like "In this font the dashes are very long"?
It went from 19.3 to 32.5. It did not even double. Which means that if you see a comment with an em-dash, it's more likely to be human than LLM.
key insight - https://trends.google.com/explore?q=key%2520insight&date=all...
etc.
If it's all comments, including flagged/dead/downvoted/etc., then it's not reflective of the actual filtering HN does.
But if it's weighting comments by their likelihood of being read -- e.g. mostly top comments on popular stories -- then I'd be a lot more curious.
I'm not surprised AI spam has increased substantially. But I'd be surprised if it's affected the comments most people actually read to anywhere close to the degree shown in this graph.
ortusdux•1h ago
add-sub-mul-div•1h ago
tayo42•1h ago
BoredPositron•1h ago
sobradob•1h ago
bitwize•1h ago
umanwizard•1h ago
razingeden•1h ago
This gets corrected to an emdash.
I get annoyed and put the double dash back in.
Sometimes swearing a little or grumbling “HEY. I typed what I typed” at it helps a little.
I don’t even know how many times in 20-30+ years I’ve checked some box in system or program preferences begging it to knock that off.
This is the real reason I already loathe and avoid the emdash (nitpicking over a personal stylistic preference I won’t relent on even if I’m wrong) but I can’t be the only one this happens to.
Getting piled on and called “AI” really doesn’t ease my distaste for it, but .. do people.. not write enough to understand that it brute forces its way into human copy as well?
and yes. phone posting on HN. will insert them. to my dismay.
The other one that ticks me off endlessly but I’ve finally said to hell with it and just let it go?
Turning " into “.
(Writer. Not a very good one and I’m not here to steer anyone to that drivel. But at least I’m a human one.)
Terr_•1h ago
Gormo•21m ago
Although I still prefer the traditional ASCII double-dash -- easier to type, and less potential for character encoding issues. Also, LLMs don't seem to use it at all.
operatingthetan•1h ago
bitwize•1h ago
Sarkie•1h ago
Now she's been accused of using AI for her pieces.
Oh well.
bb88•1h ago
You can do small succinct sentences, but style-wise it sucks for longer passages.
ButlerianJihad•1h ago
interstice•1h ago
turtleyacht•27m ago
Freedom2•26m ago
jordand•1h ago
Gormo•24m ago