So all this is speculation.
> Amazon created an AI agent to look at every account and, instead of flagging them for any potential violations, had them canceled outright. I'm not sure what the thinking was on their part.
The speculation is getting strangely specific…
> In theory, with something like this, you would have tested the process by simply running a report before doing anything to actually impact any accounts. But if they did that, they would've gotten tons of obviously false positives
But we don’t know anything about what happened, this is based on a hypothesis, speculating on the mistakes made, and how it should have been done, etc.
> 3. They did test it, saw that it raised more flags than they had the manpower to properly investigate, but said, "We're the 800 pound gorilla in the room here. F--- them!" and rolled the AI agent into production anyway.
> Obviously, I have no particular insight into Amazon's inner workings, but I'm inclined to think it was the last of these options.
Now you’re even suggesting that the players here are being malignant, and no you don’t have insights in the inner workings.
We can speculate all we want about these things, but we don’t even know whether this is related to AI, other than “it happened recently and AI also happened recently”. Yes, it’s plausible, but making any claims more specific inner workings of Amazon and what mistakes were made, never mind suggesting what they should have done otherwise, is just reaching and needs a huge disclaimer.
> Amazon created an AI agent to look at every account and, instead of flagging them for any potential violations, had them canceled outright.
girvo•1h ago
Rekindle8090•1h ago