i'd like to point out that the soviet RDS-3 was an airdropped A-bomb.
I get that you mean 'in anger', but I don't feel that bad being a pedant against a propagandist statement that's also pedantically wrong.
> "only country to use the bomb"
I was confused. Two very different statements but I assume they refer to the US who dropped two A-bombs (Hiroshima and Nagasaki) in anger.
It's the same reason why I prefer vpns that are owned by countries outside my own.
This is true of anthropic or openai - but for some reason I think the us govt or anyone else will have a harder time getting to my data from them than the CCP will any chinese company.
Why? You dont think that 5 eyes cyber peeps use every advantage they can get? And on the way out leave a dusting of evidence pointing at the russkies or chinese?
US tech companies voluntarily give their data to the US government. Don't you remember PRISM? You think they stopped doing that?
> Internal NSA presentation slides included in the various media disclosures show that the NSA could unilaterally access data and perform "extensive, in-depth surveillance on live communications and stored information" with examples including email, video and voice chat, videos, photos, voice-over-IP chats (such as Skype), file transfers, and social networking details.[2] Snowden summarized that "in general, the reality is this: if an NSA, FBI, CIA, DIA, etc. analyst has access to query raw SIGINT [signals intelligence] databases, they can enter and get results for anything they want."[13]
US companies are required by law to hand over your data if given a warrant by USG. They don't need a warrant if they have a subpoena for less invasive data, or a FISA request. They can also ask without any justification, and see if the company will cough it up anyway (they often do). Any AI company with government contracts will want to give up data quicker so as not to threaten deals worth hundreds of millions.
Thing is, either way your data is getting hoovered up. If not today then eventually. It's just a matter of where. If you work in an industry where nation states might want to do you irreparable harm then yea don't let your data leave the country.
From this line of reasoning, my guess is that the huge discount is not so much intended to sell the data collection system as much as it is intended to sell the model. If you had to wring a geopolitical consequence from this, it would be that the US labs producing models would be impacted by a vastly less expensive competitor.
v4-pro (75% off): $0.003625 / $0.435 / $0.87
v4-pro (regular): $0.0145 / $1.74 / $3.48
v4-flash: $0.0028 / $0.14 / $0.28
that is damn cheap.
Nothing specific to Deepseek.
I've been using it as part of a complex DOS game decompilation project[0]. I'm working on refactoring the software rendering pipeline so that we can add GPU rendering. The hardest part of this so far is converting the 90's polygon rendering from screen to world space.
It spun its wheels a few times doing a large mostly mechanical change. After resetting and improving my prompts it was able to get through it. I'm using Matt Pocock's skills[1] for this work, which has been quite nice.
Occasionally I go and try different agents with openrouter models, but nothing seems to really get close to the proprietary ones like claude-code.
By the way OpenRouter version is very slow for some reason. DeepSeek platform is faster (and cheaper with the discount) if you don't mind passing the credit card number / email to this company.
If you have actually used DeepSeek, you would notice that the cache-hit rate is extremely high, and the cache invalidation window is much longer than every other provider's. That suggests DeepSeek is simply much better at utilizing its infrastructure than other vendors.
I am also highly skeptical that the average user's input is worth more than the API cost of processing it. Do people really think DeepSeek researchers enjoy panning for gold in a river of boilerplate and half-baked code?
ern•1h ago
ttul•1h ago
splatzone•1h ago
ralph84•1h ago
cogman10•1h ago
peyton•1h ago
[1]: https://cdn.deepseek.com/policies/en-US/deepseek-privacy-pol...
2ndorderthought•1h ago
yehosef•53m ago
2ndorderthought•48m ago
iosjunkie•42m ago
2ndorderthought•34m ago
serf•57m ago
niobe•1h ago
But, overall, the current AI pricing is completely unsustainable, across all AI companies, except via the exponential growth they are relying on. Dylan Patel did the most insightful analysis of this I've come across.. https://youtu.be/mDG_Hx3BSUE?si=nyJu4adwYCH1igbJ
sidrag22•1h ago
2ndorderthought•1h ago
jarym•1h ago
2ndorderthought•1h ago
flakiness•1h ago
https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/deepseek-nears-45...
2ndorderthought•1h ago
serf•1h ago
yes, single gpu open models exist. Now show me the one that can keep up with a SOTA api model on more than short code block evals.
2ndorderthought•57m ago
mattas•1h ago
AlexB138•54m ago
rafram•47m ago
- Every competitor is planning for the demand to be much higher in a few years than it is now, and aiming to capture as much of that as they can, which starts by getting companies hooked on their models now
- The data center capacity will get used no matter who captures the most demand
HWR_14•1h ago
dominotw•59m ago
Anthropic is learning that lesson now. Doesnt help that their ceo goes around antognozing everyone by claiming jobs are over and annoying boris does like 500 podcasts per week repeating "coding is solved"
mannanj•58m ago
Sincerely, - I see you AI companies harvesting our data giving us discounted subscriptions so we can not realize we are paying you to take our own data!
dyauspitr•47m ago