> Every entry below points at a real paper that the working group adopted. None of these are arguments. They are admissions in writing.
I smell AI. If you don't write it, I don't read it.
Traubenfuchs•30m ago
Better get used to it, the art of writing without AI assistance is dead. You will occasionally find some of it like a truffle in the woods, but that was it. And even if the next generation will attempt stringing a few sentences together by hand it will sound like AI, because they grew up spending more time talking to AI than anyone else.
scared_together•23m ago
I attend a local writer’s group in my area, where people write in person within a time limit. The art of writing without AI assistance still lives, but it’s not online and probably not discussing the C++ standard library.
darthoctopus•22m ago
this kind of overt inevitabilism is complicity in the death of good writing.
1313ed01•10m ago
If I want to read a LLM's "opinion" on some subject I just prompt it myself. Inserting humans as intermediaries that pretend they wrote something is dishonest at best. Future generations will hopefully see through that and stop sign generated texts with fake human names.
anematode•24m ago
> This is what fifteen years of standards work on a five-letter keyword ['volatile'] looks like.
How many letters are in the word 'volatile' ?
bsder•21m ago
Woof. Didn't even bother to proofread the AI slop. Wow.
I think we need a "Flag AI Slop" button.
delusional•8m ago
That's just the "Flag" button.
oezi•19m ago
I left C++ almost 10 years ago but I still remember how surprised and frustrated I was when auto_ptr was deprecated and then removed from the C++ standard as we had built our dependency injection framework and progress primitive on it.
stephbook•41m ago
I smell AI. If you don't write it, I don't read it.
Traubenfuchs•30m ago
scared_together•23m ago
darthoctopus•22m ago
1313ed01•10m ago
anematode•24m ago
How many letters are in the word 'volatile' ?
bsder•21m ago
I think we need a "Flag AI Slop" button.
delusional•8m ago