Wow, if it's this easy in 1998, I bet it'll be even easier in 2026

https://retro.social/@ifixcoinops/116711332505710610

58•rihegher•2h ago

Comments

macroteam•1h ago

the prediction wasn't even wrong, it just split in two. deploying a static site in 2026 is genuinely easier than 1998. you drag a folder into netlify and you're done, no ISP instructions, no FTP client, no guy with a tarp. what exploded is everything before the deploy. and the funny thing is the actual complaint buried in this thread, "i don't want to paste my nav into every page and update it by hand," is the exact problem we've spent 25 years re-solving. frames, then SSI, then php includes, then templating engines, then the whole frontend framework industry. react is, underneath everything, a really elaborate way to not repeat your navbar.

lelanthran•52m ago

> react is, underneath everything, a really elaborate way to not repeat your navbar.

That specific use-case is now replaced by having a single, small webcomponent for client-side includes.

    <cs-include remote-src="..."></cs-include>

Is a much better dev-XP than configuring the server, then tying your sources to that specific server.

slau•1h ago

What a brilliant piece of writing. I remember almost every single step—safe for actually getting angry emails. Maybe I ended up being the one writing them.

What a glorious time period.

Interestingly, it would’ve been impossible to share this writing with as many people as the author did by publishing it on mastodon and then it ended up on HN in 1998. The network effects are real.

superkuh•1h ago

SSI is still the perfect balance of just enough power to do templating with .html fragments with a minimal attack surface and no maintainence from version churn. It's stable, it's tested, it's left alone. It's in most major webservers as a core module. It's as good now as it was in 1998.

rado•1h ago

Completely ignoring accessibility

dpe82•1h ago

And there were a bunch of WYSIWYG editors in the mid-late 90s. It seems like everyone had one, including Netscape: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netscape_Composer

JimDabell•14m ago

The very first web browser that ever existed – WorldWideWeb – had a WYSIWYG editor.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WorldWideWeb

zuzululu•1h ago

Not seeing anything

Looks like its getting a ton of traffic

Spinner and load bar at the top

dwedge•1h ago

Those angry emails from guys (it's always guys) felt so contrived and wedged in just to attack other guys. I reminded me of the tweet about how people online invent someone doing a hypothetical situation and then get mad at them

nadagast•1h ago

I enjoyed this. But reading the claim that the iPhone was bad compared to other phones of the day makes me question it all. That's so incredibly backwards. It _was_ a much better internet in your pocket. If you couldn't see that, it says something about you, not phones.

Retric•1h ago

It was a bad phone, poor battery life, fragile, and relatively poor reception.

That was more than offset by the unmetered internet connection + decent browser, but that’s a feature not everything.

aaronbrethorst•59m ago

it's 3 products: a widescreen iPod, a phone, and an internet communicator. Are you getting it?

MarcScott•49m ago

I seem to recall I had a windows phone at the time, with a full keyboard. I could use OS maps on the thing, and although it didn't have GPS, it could get my rough location by tower.

My mate had an iPhone, and it had an app where you could pretend to drink a pint of beer.

charamis•42m ago

That might prove the novelty of the App Store back then. Also, let’s not forget that its’ screen was better than most other smartphones of its time. It was a rather limited phone, but not bad exactly.

fsh•

beau_g•1h ago

I read the beginning of the post and immediately tabbed back to start writing a rant about standing up a website being fine, but the real loss of web functionality was Flash, glad I kept reading. I'm quite good with CSS and doing tricks with SVGs, but constantly run into things I want to do in 2D web I find to be complex enough and time consuming enough I don't even bother, while I would have been able to do it in Flash as a 13 year old in a few minutes. The modern web is a prison built out of <div>s, the tricks you see for "amazing" websites with obnoxious scrolljacking/parallax don't hide it.

xvxvx•51m ago

My experience was almost identical. Don’t forget all the time spent balancing image quality with load speed to get that perfect blend of shit quality and slow download.

sznio•16m ago

> Making a website should be the easiest fucking thing in the world by now. There should be a program that you can use to spit out a website as easy as Word spits out words on paper

squarespace?

> and we - us fucking foss nerds or whoever - should've made it.

wordpress?

JimDabell•43m ago

Very little of this rings true for me, but that part worst of all.

The mobile web pre-iPhone was terrible. Nobody used it, nobody wanted to use it, and nobody wanted to build it. At best there was a shitty cut back version on the `m` subdomain. WAP/WML were terrible and didn’t give you anything close to the real web, and XHTML Basic was still-born.

The iPhone came along with its “desktop class web browser” and it genuinely worked. Steve Jobs got on stage and told everybody if they wanted to build apps for the iPhone, they should be web apps. Then he told everybody Flash was terrible – which it was – and that we should all use open standards instead.

Practically overnight, everybody commissioning websites wanted them to be “iPhone-compatible”. They did not ask for mobile sites – they specifically asked for them to be iPhone-compatible.

And because WebKit was open-source (thanks to it being based upon KHTML), all the other phone vendors took the code and ran with it, including Android.

This is why I say there is no single organisation that has done more to push the mobile web forward than Apple. The difference in attitudes and capability towards the mobile web changed practically overnight, and it’s directly attributable to Apple’s intentional actions to develop and promote the mobile web.

HeavyStorm•4m ago

> Very little of this rings true

How old are you? I'm betting mid-twenties.

1k Data Breaches Later, the Disclosure Lag Is Worse

Dopamine Fracking

APC–2 – A professional record cutter for producing original playback discs

Cannibalism

The Smallest Brain You Can Build: A Perceptron in Python

Building from zero after addiction, prison, and a felony

1worldflag: A blue dot on a transparent background

Tiny hackable CUDA language model implementation

New drug 'functionally cures' many hepatitis B virus infections

Algorithmic Monocultures in Hiring

Richard Scolyer Has Died

Show HN: NoSuggest – Watch YouTube without the recommendation algorithm

DeepSeek V4 Pro beats GPT-5.5 Pro on precision

Playing with Vision Embeddings

Show HN: I Derived a Pancake

Making peace with your unlived dreams (2023)

A Matter Wi-Fi Light Bulb in Rust on the Raspberry Pi Pico 2 W

A discovery about GCC's unidirectional rotation algorithm

Man-Computer Symbiosis J. C. R. Licklider (1960)

Trusted Computing Frequently Asked Questions (2003)

How's Linear so fast? A technical breakdown

What is the purpose of the lost+found folder in Linux and Unix? (2014)

Do agents.md files help coding agents?

Texas grid flags risks as data centers, crypto sites fail voltage tests

Show HN: Lathe – Use LLMs to learn a new domain, not skip past it

The 29th International Obfuscated C Code Contest (IOCCC) 2025 Winners

Do we fear the serializable isolation level more than we fear subtle bugs (2024)

LLMs are eroding my software engineering career and I don't know what to do

Powering up a module from the IBM 604: an electronic calculator from 1948

7.8 magnitude earthquake shakes part of southern Philippines. Tsunami possible