That said, I don’t think its a problem whatsoever and we shouldn’t have laws restricting it.
Just putting it out there on how quickly this tech turned against the population.
The other ones are simple and/or deluded and think these sorts of policies won't ever come for _them_. (To their credit, under the current regime they're actually correct about that to a certain extent.)
That being said, many countries across the world already do this to eliminate burner phones. And many messaging apps require a phone number anyways so this basically locks down anonymous messaging through a phone.
It's much more concerning when said practices are undertaken by the U.S.
Just because other countries do something isn't a justification to bring the practice into the U.S. despite that being a justification used with increasing prevalence these days.
Yes they occur. Yes the US does it. Every violation of it should have lost in court already but courts have a way of interpreting things based on their beliefs rather than original intent.
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filings/express
Ran a quick search and found a whole bunch of news articles, but nobody includes info that makes it easy to route your comment. Feels like the beginning of Hitchhiker's Guide:
> It was on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying Beware of the Leopard.
While there is ~zero chance that commenting can help you, it absolutely is used against you as their lawyers sharpen their claws by crowdsourcing possible sources of challenge and use your comments to predict them and determine how to undermine such positions.
Guess these guys are going to make more money in the near future.
You can't make the desk clerk in a ghetto cell phone store care.
I say this speaking as someone who has a T-Mobile account under the name George Washington with a Valley Forge, Pennsylvania address.
The real issue is whether government's should have the right to metadata or the content of remote communications.
Government's don't claim the right to monitor face to face communications so why should they have the right to do so for remote communications.
Your bank already knows everything about you; why not your operating system, too?
Soon your ISP will only let you online if your OS sends them the "right" information: your government ID.
We should also abolish cash while we're at it. The government needs to know every purchase you've ever made, no exceptions.
Of course, then we should tear down used bookstores. They're the biggest risk of all. Anyone can walk in and pick up pieces of paper that teach them dangerous ideas. Other religions. Philosophies. Poetry. How to make things.
What we really need is a nation of drones walking to and fro in the image of our rulers, thinking their thoughts, practicing their religions, and parroting their words. It's the only way to be truly safe.
The Thiels of the world are already past wanting an obedient consumer.
They don't need us for the utopia they imagine for themselves.
they call that "anarcho-tyranny"
If everyone ignores it then what's the fuss about?
Some of the LTE tablets even powered up and put you into a walled garden with data (heh, DNS tunneling worked out of it) to let you sign up for a mobile plan out of the box.
When I did some activations with PagePlus with an actual dealer-level account, it cost me nothing to activate a 'customer' handset and the only info I had to provide on the activation screens was the phone's serial number and the requested ZIP/area code for activation.
And fine, okay, the FCC will force American telecoms to require IDs, but nothing's stoping Redtea Mobile's foreign eSIMs from roaming into the US for data connections. You're just one eSIM global roaming provider away from bypassing all of it!
I need to know whether these other countries are rich western europe before I know whether to agree with you or to cook up some snide rebuttal.
Joking, obviously. And by "joking" I mean mocking a specific type of person and set of beliefs that is who is a) bad b) really common around here.
But not all, so what's the actual point?
I don't know any way to avoid this.
matrix, wire, deltachat, threema, maybe jabber/xmpp (depends on their support of encryption). any others?
Why do you think all the rich people (and by extension the oligarchy running this country) are pushing Crypto?
dkdbejwi383•2h ago
mc32•1h ago
nickphx•1h ago
naturalmovement•1h ago
TylerE•1h ago
vfclists•58m ago
NoMoreNicksLeft•1h ago
logicchains•1h ago
rusk•1h ago
Not that we didn’t get anything in return but the idea that the worlds foremost military industrial complex just gave this to the world because they loved us is laughable.
chopin•47m ago
I thought about getting a SIM when Germany was about to introduce ID requirements. I quickly realized this being a moot point.
stackskipton•50m ago
Also, if you have restrictions of speech in the country, it's great way to de anonymize any speech government says is illegal.
naturalmovement•1h ago
Much of EU requires ID for some time now. France is a bit strange, requires registration after 23 days or something. Germany, Italy, Spain it's basically impossible.
The US is rather unique in that it does not require registration.
joxdosba•1h ago
EU countries have had these requirements for years and years and never moved to actually enforce them.
naturalmovement•1h ago
Last I traveled the shop required a passport or uploading one to get an eSIM ahead of time.
joxdosba•1h ago
> Last I traveled the shop required a passport or uploading one to get an eSIM ahead of time.
Sounds like you went to a carrier boutique and not one of the million independent shops.
lifestyleguru•1h ago
dgellow•1h ago
mothballed•1h ago
nemomarx•1h ago
If they want to know what tourists are posting about their country that's good enough.
voakbasda•1h ago
mothballed•25m ago
[] https://www.acma.gov.au/support-law-enforcement-and-security...
LawnGnome•34m ago
ibejoeb•6m ago
LawnGnome•4m ago
ibejoeb•1m ago