frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

A website that lists websites to submit your website to

https://www.submission.directory/
237•azeemkafridi•3h ago•65 comments

I found 10k GitHub repositories distributing Trojan malware

https://orchidfiles.com/github-repositories-distributing-malware/
363•theorchid•6h ago•102 comments

Swiss parliament lifts ban on new nuclear power plants

https://www.bluewin.ch/en/news/switzerland/parliament-lifts-ban-on-new-nuclear-power-plants-32575...
385•leonidasrup•4h ago•226 comments

Notes from Tired Egyptian Whose Job Is Explaining That Humans Built the Pyramids

https://www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/notes-from-a-tired-egyptian-guy-whose-job-is-explaining-that-...
35•Geekette•2d ago•22 comments

Migrating from GNU Stow to Chezmoi

https://rednafi.com/misc/chezmoi/
20•speckx•1h ago•15 comments

Launch HN: TesterArmy (YC P26) – Agents that test web and mobile apps

https://tester.army
57•okwasniewski•3h ago•32 comments

The Harajuku Moment

https://tim.blog/2024/02/09/harajuku-moment/
37•abhaynayar•2h ago•16 comments

Hospitals and universities repurposing drugs at 90% lower cost

https://www.kcl.ac.uk/news/hospitals-and-universities-repurposing-drugs-at-90-lower-cost
214•giuliomagnifico•8h ago•88 comments

Advanced Compilers: The Self-Guided Online Course

https://www.cs.cornell.edu/courses/cs6120/2025fa/self-guided/
190•ibobev•7h ago•25 comments

The founder of Craigslist has given away half a billion dollars

https://www.independent.co.uk/us/money/craigslist-multimillionaire-craig-newmark-b2980681.html
93•Tomte•1h ago•39 comments

Modos Color Monitor Pushes E-Paper Displays Further

https://spectrum.ieee.org/modos-e-paper-monitor
147•Vinnl•6h ago•36 comments

TerraPower in Deal with Meta for Eight Natrium 345 MW Advanced Nuclear Plants

https://neutronbytes.com/2026/01/09/terrapower-in-mega-deal-with-meta-for-eight-natrium-345-mw-ad...
67•mpweiher•3h ago•65 comments

Has W Social switched to closed source?

https://blog.elenarossini.com/w-social-public-institutions-and-the-theater-of-european-digital-so...
135•nemoniac•5h ago•85 comments

Show HN: Gerrymandle - Daily puzzle game where you redraw electoral districts

https://gerrymandle.cc/
58•realmofthemad•4h ago•24 comments

Emacs 31 is around the corner: The changes I'm daily driving

https://www.rahuljuliato.com/posts/emacs-31-around-the-corner
314•frou_dh•6h ago•165 comments

Emacs, how it all started (for me)

https://xvw.lol/en/articles/emacs-start.html
61•nukifw•3d ago•21 comments

DeepSeek Introduces Vision

https://chat.deepseek.com/
398•RIshabh235•12h ago•161 comments

.gitignore Isn't the Only Way to Ignore Files in Git

https://nelson.cloud/.gitignore-isnt-the-only-way-to-ignore-files-in-git/
156•FergusArgyll•8h ago•41 comments

Microsoft new Outlook takes 10 seconds to do what Outlook Classic does instantly

https://www.windowslatest.com/2026/06/15/microsofts-new-outlook-takes-10-seconds-to-do-what-outlo...
405•Adam-Hincu•6h ago•282 comments

Local Qwen isn't a worse Opus, it's a different tool

https://blog.alexellis.io/local-ai-is-not-opus/
417•alphabettsy•15h ago•224 comments

The Token Compression Illusion: Why I'm Skeptical of RTK

https://mroczek.dev/articles/the-token-compression-illusion-why-im-skeptical-of-rtk/
8•lackoftactics•58m ago•35 comments

Ubiquiti: Enterprise NAS, Built on ZFS

https://blog.ui.com/article/introducing-enterprise-nas
147•ksec•4h ago•132 comments

We built a persistent agent memory layer on Elasticsearch with 0.89 recall

https://www.elastic.co/search-labs/blog/agent-memory-elasticsearch
80•showmypost•7h ago•33 comments

Midjourney Medical

https://www.midjourney.com/medical/blogpost
1207•ricochet11•16h ago•820 comments

Migrate from OpenClaw

https://hermes-agent.nousresearch.com/docs/guides/migrate-from-openclaw
92•JumpCrisscross•4h ago•70 comments

Unity vs. Floating Point

https://aras-p.info/blog/2026/06/11/Unity-vs-floating-point/
42•ibobev•3d ago•12 comments

Vinyl Cache and Varnish Cache

https://vinyl-cache.org/organization/on_vinyl_cache_and_varnish_cache.html#org-vinyl-varnish
71•embedding-shape•3d ago•31 comments

Seven Perfect Shuffles Randomize a Deck of Cards. But How Many Sloppy Ones?

https://www.quantamagazine.org/seven-perfect-shuffles-randomize-a-deck-of-cards-but-how-many-slop...
65•layer8•9h ago•39 comments

Image Toolbox (T8RIN)

https://github.com/T8RIN/ImageToolbox/
28•unexpectedVCR•3d ago•4 comments

Ask HN: What is the job market like?

3•gardnr•14m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

US Supreme Court drug users cannot be prohibited from firearms [pdf]

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1234_g2bh.pdf
18•agensaequivocum•3h ago

Comments

SilverElfin•3h ago
They also need to invalidate, with jail time for legislators and governors, all the flagrantly unconstitutional gun control laws in blue states. A constitutional right is a constitutional right.
stymaar•1h ago
Read the second amendment: the constitutional right is about “A well regulated Militia”.
jpcfl•1h ago
"Well regulated" refers to their ability to shoot straight, and a militia is a civilian force. This language is about civilians being capable of handling weapons.
sparrish•1h ago
Keep reading...

"the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"

You can't have a citizen's militia without an armed populace. If 'the people' don't have guns, you don't have a militia.

strideashort•1h ago
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

It’s about the right.

The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed, _because_ a well regulated Militia, is necessary to the security of a free State.

The point is to prevent the state from monopolizing violence, simple as.

sophacles•1h ago
A well regulated militia would determine what types of guns, what ammo, what uniforms, what qualifies a member, etc.

Besides the freedom of the State means that its not subordinate to another State. Not that random people get to shoot at the duly elected State government.

strideashort•31m ago
You are simply reading the sentence wrong. Well regulated militia is not condition.
stymaar•35m ago
> The point is to prevent the state from monopolizing violence, simple as.

Absolutely not. The state and the federal government definitely keep the monopoly of violence: you can't kill someone you believe raped your wife, the government can (under due process but still).

Refusing the government to have the monopoly of violence would mean that other groups independent from the state can exert violence on their fellow American citizens. That's was obviously not the intent here…

strideashort•25m ago
A single man is no threat to the state, so your example is wrong.

A militia could be.

To be able to form militia to resist the government, individuals have absolute right to be armed.

The mechanics is really pretty simple.

And yes, I believe that extends to all arms, as is written, otherwise the intent - to be able to form militia which can overpower the government - can not be fulfilled.

That is the constitution.

I am not saying I agree with it, but at the same time, without absolute right to bear arms, the government _will_ demilitarize the people.

agensaequivocum•55m ago
> The chief purport of these amendments was to annex to the Constitution a more specific bill of rights. Freedom of religion, of speech, and of the press were thereby secured; ...; the private right to bear arms;

~ History of the United States Volume II - James Schouler 1880

> [T]he right ... to have full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings concerning personal liberty, personal security, ... including the constitutional right to bear arms, shall be secured to and enjoyed by all the citizens of such States or districts without respect to race or color, or previous condition of slavery.

~ Freedmen's Burea Act extension overriding presidential veto - Congress 1866

> The physique and the manly appearance of the American people seems to make them well suited for the military profession. The young people very early get used to traveling and toil. Hunting is the young men's chief pasttime. This not only strengthens them bodily but teaches them to handle guns and thus prepares them for the hardships of war. In addition to this every free man has a right to keep arms in his house and to use them when he wants.

~ America 1818-1820 - Baron Klinkowstrom

> The constitution of the United States contains a number of expres limitation upon the Federal legislative power. In addition to those contained in the first then Amendments relative to freedom of religion, speech, and press, the quartering of troops, the right of the people to assemble, to petition, to keep and bear arms, to be secure against unreasonable searches and seizures...

~ Principles of the Constitutional Law of the United States (1917) - Westel Willoughby

> The provision in the federal constitution on the subject is; "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

~ The United States Constitutional Manual (1845) - Mordecai M'Kinney

> I. Personal Rights of Individuals ... The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

~ The Federal Government; it's officers and Their Duties (1871) ~ Ransom H. Gillet

> The constitution makes it the right, the laws make it the duty, of all citizens within certain ages, to bear arms.

~ Education in a Republic (1838) - Edward Everett

> A man may arm himself for a case of probable danger; he may do it with a view to no specific occurrence, and he may do it in self-defense. Who can object to it? The constitution guarantees to every man the right bear arms. No law takes it away, and none every can. The right of self-defense is an inherent one, given by God, to man. It is our own natural right, and, as Blackstone says, no human legislation can ever take it from us.

~ The Life of John J. Crittenden With Selections From His Correspondence and Speeches (US Rep, US Senator, US AG, Gov of KY) (1871) - Edited by His Daughter, Mrs. Capman Coleman

NoImmatureAdHom•49m ago
...but... it continues, "...the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed"
vitally3643•1h ago
Clearly you haven't actually read and understood the constitution.
evil-olive•1h ago
> with jail time for legislators and governors

uh-huh. what provision in the Constitution authorizes this, exactly?

is there anything in contemporaneous writings (Federalist Papers, for example) where someone advocated that a reasonable separation of powers would be "Article 3 judges should have the power to send legislators to jail as a side-effect of ruling that a law is unconstitutional"?

you can argue about the 2nd Amendment all you want, that's one of the oldest pastimes on the internet. but arguing that legislators should be thrown in jail for passing laws you don't like is flashing a big neon "I'm a crank" sign.

SilverElfin•2m ago
The constitution is the highest law of the land. Violating it has consequences. They should be enforced.

> but arguing that legislators should be thrown in jail for passing laws you don't like is flashing a big neon "I'm a crank" sign

Ad hominem aside, this is equivalent to “We should have laws but they should be selectively meaningless”

mcphage•1h ago
> They also need to invalidate, with jail time for legislators and governors, all the flagrantly unconstitutional gun control laws in blue states.

If you’re looking to send people to jail for violating the constitution, how about start with pretty much the entire current administration? That’ll show others that you’re speaking about honestly held beliefs.

Hell, why bring up blue states at all, given this took place in Texas?

avalys•1h ago
Nice to see a unanimous decision on a (by most appearances) controversial topic like this.
NoImmatureAdHom•43m ago
It's less polarized than people think. Most people just don't care about most opinions. ~1/3 of opinions are unanimous.

https://web.archive.org/web/20260310212334/https://fivethirt...

https://reason.com/2025/06/05/is-the-supreme-court-really-th...

thmsths•1h ago
Looking at the first page, the circumstances surrounding the indictment are infuriating. I thought that search warrants had to be specific to avoid just that kind of fishing expedition. The initial warrant was for terrorism related charges, it seems they found no evidence of it. How come they can then turn around and go for other charges?
toomuchtodo•1h ago
No downside, all upside. Qualified immunity, etc. There are no consequences for this behavior by law enforcement and prosecutors unfortunately.

"Show me the incentive and I'll show you the outcome."

tmp10423288442•1h ago
If a cop happens to see evidence of a crime, they don't need a warrant to arrest you for it nor for you to be charged for it. Unfortunate for this man, but he shouldn't have had drugs on him (he also had cocaine in addition to marijuana).
toomuchtodo•1h ago
Law enforcement dishonesty is so frequent, state lists exist to track them ("Brady List").

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brady_disclosure

https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewconten...

https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/minnlrev/vol107/iss2/3/

This administration revoked an executive order from the previous administration ("EO 14074") providing for a National Law Enforcement Accountability Database. And so, for the time being, citizens and journalists are left to collect, aggregate, and disseminate this information until the next administration takes office.

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/05/31/2022-11...

https://bjs.ojp.gov/national-law-enforcement-accountability-...

https://www.prisonpolicy.org/blog/2026/01/26/police_miscondu...

Obligatory "Don't Talk To The Police"

Video: https://archive.org/details/youtube-d-7o9xYp7eE

Paper: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1998119

HN Threads: https://hn.algolia.com/?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwa...

stymaar•34m ago
Your perplexity/ ChatGPT quotes won't erase the fact that the blue states laws around guns haven't actually been ruled unconstitutional…
blochist•1h ago
Well, also just looking at the first page, while I think there are analogous circumstances where this would've been infuriating (e.g., the government executes an unrelated search warrant, discovers both marijuana and the gun and charges him with it), in this case, it seems as though he both surrendered the gun to them and freely admitted to using marijuana which he also directed them to. That said, the search warrant was related to terrorism and it's very likely it would've authorized the agents to search for any drugs and firearms or other weapons.