frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Apertus – Open Foundation Model for Sovereign AI

https://apertvs.ai/
172•T-A•3h ago•60 comments

Did my old job only exist because of fraud?

https://david.newgas.net/did-my-old-job-only-exist-because-of-fraud/
184•advisedwang•3h ago•79 comments

Everything is logarithms

https://alexkritchevsky.com/2026/05/25/everything-is-logarithms.html
91•E-Reverance•4h ago•11 comments

I was wrong about the Midjourney ultra-sound scanner

https://twitter.com/MattZirwas/status/2068365802491834541
26•MrBuddyCasino•12h ago•20 comments

Petition against Meta's employee training data collection for ML models

https://mcipetition.com/
16•reasonableklout•1h ago•5 comments

JSON-LD explained for personal websites

https://hawksley.dev/blog/json-ld-explained-for-personal-websites/
155•ethanhawksley•6h ago•39 comments

PowerFox Browser

https://powerfox.jazzzny.me/
62•thisislife2•3h ago•17 comments

Identity verification on Claude

https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14328960-identity-verification-on-claude
556•bathory•12h ago•500 comments

Simple hard way to conjugate Japanese verbs

https://underreacted.leaflet.pub/3mmevu6woys27
27•valzevul•2h ago•24 comments

Beyond All Reason (Free Total Annihilation Inspired RTS)

https://www.beyondallreason.info
428•mosiuerbarso•13h ago•254 comments

Prefer duplication over the wrong abstraction (2016)

https://sandimetz.com/blog/2016/1/20/the-wrong-abstraction
423•rafaepta•9h ago•288 comments

I Play Video Games with Spinal Muscular Atrophy

https://www.openassistivetech.org/how-i-actually-play-video-games-with-sma-the-tools-i-use-every-...
21•dannyobrien•3d ago•3 comments

Show HN: Recall – fully-local project memory for Claude Code

https://github.com/raiyanyahya/recall
62•mateenah•4h ago•53 comments

HPV jabs cut risk of dying from cervical cancer before 30 to almost zero

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2026/jun/17/hpv-jabs-reduce-risk-dying-cervical-cancer-before...
137•toomuchtodo•4d ago•68 comments

There is minimal downside to switching to open models

https://www.marble.onl/posts/cancel_claude.html
29•amarble•4h ago•6 comments

Good results fine tuning a local LLM like Qwen 3:0.6B to categorize questions

https://www.teachmecoolstuff.com/viewarticle/fine-tuning-a-local-llm-to-categorize-questions
9•dev-experiments•2h ago•0 comments

FDA advisors unanimously vote to approve Moderna's mRNA after agency drama

https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/06/fda-advisors-unanimously-vote-to-approve-modernas-mrna-aft...
90•worik•3h ago•47 comments

The minimum viable unit of saleable software

https://brandur.org/minimum-viable-unit
123•brandur•8h ago•49 comments

(How to Write a (Lisp) Interpreter (In Python)) (2010)

https://norvig.com/lispy.html
163•tosh•9h ago•55 comments

Show HN: Criterion Closet as a website – pull any of 1,247 films off the shelf

https://the-criterion-closet.vercel.app
39•olievans•1d ago•10 comments

From Combinatorial Mess to Linear Elegance: Architecting a Conversion Engine

https://blog.minimal.app/conversion-engine/
4•arthurofbabylon•4d ago•1 comments

Wildcard (YC W25) is hiring an applied ML engineer

https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/wildcard/jobs/SEmo4di-founding-applied-ml-engineer
1•kaushikmahorker•8h ago

An Embedded Linux on a Single Floppy

https://github.com/w84death/floppinux
59•modinfo•2d ago•25 comments

Ask for no, don't ask for yes (2022)

https://www.mooreds.com/wordpress/archives/3518
105•skogstokig•4h ago•48 comments

Show HN: MiniPCs.zip – Charting the Pareto frontier of Mini PCs

https://minipcs.zip
8•yathern•1d ago•5 comments

Minecraft: Java Edition 26.2, the first version with Vulkan 1.2

https://www.minecraft.net/en-us/article/minecraft-java-edition-26-2
48•ObviouslyFlamer•4d ago•10 comments

Show HN: Teach your kids perfect pitch

https://github.com/paytonjjones/bsharp
49•paytonjjones•12h ago•31 comments

My 1992 view of the problems of computer programming in 1992

https://blog.plover.com/prog/fortran-i.html
4•pavel_lishin•3h ago•1 comments

The Doom Justifies the Valuation

https://geohot.github.io//blog/jekyll/update/2026/06/21/the-doom-justifies-the-valuation.html
13•inatreecrown2•26m ago•1 comments

Show HN: CleverCrow: give tokens to your favorite projects

https://clevercrow.io
32•zhubert•6h ago•46 comments
Open in hackernews

The Deadly Rise of Giant Trucks and S.U.V.s

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2026/06/21/us/trucks-suv-pedestrian-crashes.html
29•xnx•2h ago

Comments

kelseyfrog•1h ago
These are gender-affirming vehicles for a large number of men. Taking them away is a direct attack on their masculinity. When we say, "Men are under attack," it refers to things like this.

Regardless of any safety claims, for that reason alone, I don't see it as a politically viable issue.

TacticalCoder•1h ago
> These are gender-affirming vehicles for a large number of men.

I think people simply do find SUVs (which I don't like) convenient. Many women, including a huge number of moms, do happen to just love SUVs. Both in the US and in the EU.

In the EU SUVs are now approaching 60% of all cars sold (59.25% or so, latest numbers). You don't get such a market share by being mostly cars sold to men needing to "gender-affirm".

tapoxi•1h ago
I drive an SUV. It's convenient!

A Ford F150 is fucking ridiculous in comparison, and larger than any truck I remember seeing growing up, and there's people with F350s for personal use.

One of them ran over and killed a kid outside a nearby children's museum. Those things are not safe.

bjt•1h ago
"SUV" is too broad a category. A RAV4 is an SUV. It's similarly sized to most of the SUVs I've seen in Europe. And a pedestrian getting hit by one would have a similar experience to getting hit by a sedan. It's nothing like the big Rams, GMCs or F250s with the high front grilles that are becoming more popular while also being far deadlier to pedestrians.
bediger4000•1h ago
You're right, I don't know why you're getting down voted. You e got my admiration for being brave enough to write this on HN
sublinear•1h ago
You might be the one saying this right now, but how old is this comment?

I don't think I've ever heard any man ever say that in real life, but even online it's probably been almost a decade since this was memed into the ground.

kelseyfrog•1h ago
> I don't think I've ever heard any man ever say that in real life

Um, because men get weird when you point out the gender-affirming actions they do? Try it irl and see what the reactions are. There's a reason the only place free of physical intimidation is where this can be safely said.

Besides, how old is the privacy comment or the "parents should parent" comment we see dragged out on every kid's social media ban? It's almost like the age of the sentiment doesn't have any bearing on its relevancy.

ortusdux•1h ago
Does the added risk translate proportionally to increased insurance costs? Or is there an imbalance? When I was a teen getting insurance for the first time, certain vehicle colors were significantly more expensive to insure, and that fact factored into my car buying decisions.
xnx•41m ago
There are almost never consequences for hitting someone with your car.
protocolture•1h ago
I have 360 degree cameras (at toddler height), auto braking, every conceivable safety mechanism. I really think that once these are implemented, any hatred of large vehicles is just jealousy.
downrightmike•1h ago
None of that fixes an inattentive driver flying down the road playing with tiktok on their phone
doubled112•45m ago
Agreed. It definitely fixes backing over a toddler in your driveway though.

I have a newer crossover. I put a hitch mount cargo box on and went to back out of the driveway. It slammed the brakes on harder than I ever have.

ungreased0675•1h ago
My normal sized car is at a significant disadvantage in a collision with a full-sized SUV. This creates higher injury risk for me and my family.

Larger vehicles also cause more road damage over time, which raises my taxes or reduces the quality of roads I drive on.

For those reasons, I think vehicles should be taxed by weight, to encourage more smaller, lighter vehicles.

bobbytables1•1h ago
Jealous of what exactly? Sounds like you are trying to justify your needlessly large/heavy vehicle. Plenty of accidents still occur with vehicles that have all those features. And accidents involving large/heavy vehicles are deadlier. It’s not rocket science. On top of that they have other downsides, like increased pollution and road degradation.
adamsb6•1h ago
No mention of CAFE standards? How can you write this article without mentioning the policy that incentivizes larger vehicles?
technonerd•50m ago
No mention of the 1964 chicken tax either.
dlcarrier•24m ago
I'm excited that EVs get to avoid CAFE standards, so we get to have small vehicles again. Even though legacy domestic car manufacturers aren't going to be involved, as they practically wrote the CAFE standards that eliminated small vehicles, and there's bipartisan support to tariff EV imports out of existence, there's still enough market demand for multiple domestic startups.
toomuchtodo•19m ago
Unfortunately, we still get abominations like the GMC Hummer EV (~9000 lbs, classified as a class 3 medium duty truck). Rumor has it the model has been cancelled after 2026 luckily.

https://arstechnica.com/cars/2024/11/driving-the-biggest-lea...

https://www.torquenews.com/17998/i-leased-hummer-ev-because-...

avalys•1h ago
There are many factors driving this:

1. Fuel economy regulations that scale regressively with vehicle size, that incentivize automakers to build and market larger vehicles that are easier to hit regulatory targets.

2. Rollover and crash worthiness regulations that require thicker A-pillars and more robust roof structure.

3. Towing performance. The large pickup manufacturers are in an arms race to beat each other’s power and towing capacity numbers. This requires a large, upright grille to provide adequate cooling for a large engine.

4. Consumer demand. The idea that marketing is telling people what to buy is silly. People are spending $80k+ on massive vehicles because they like them. Simple as that. The industry puts lot of marketing effort behind vehicles that are flops. They can’t make people buy a product they don’t want.

Disclaimer: I own a huge diesel pickup, along with a Tesla Model Y and a Porsche 911. Why? They’re fun! I use the pickup to tow an RV, but it’s also just fun to drive.

I have definitely noticed the visibility problem though. Forget pedestrians, sometimes entire cars are hiding behind the A-pillar! You have to move your head to the side to clear the blind spot safely.

tasty_freeze•1h ago
Recent Climate Town video on the move to trucks and SUVs: https://youtu.be/JPm4de6-eTg?si=Eu1y3uQIeCGnkR_2

If you don't know Rollie Williams, Climate Town videos are informative but suffused with a lot of humor to prevent it from being too preachy.

recursivedoubts•53m ago
all we want are 70-series land cruisers, prados and suzuki jimnys

end the idiotic chicken tax and make small trucks and utes legal again

while we are on the topic, full size vans make a lot more sense than "suvs" for most families

xnx•33m ago
Unfortunately, in the car size arms race, bigger and heavier cars are safer for their occupants.

"Everyone outside the car be damned" is the expressed preference of US buyers.

Eddy_Viscosity2•17m ago
I don't think the US consumers are buying the bigger SUV/trucks because they are safer. At best it might be a minor contributing factor. It's primarily a status/identity thing.
toomuchtodo•50s ago
n=1, I dated a woman who specifically drove a Chevy Tahoe due to mass for safety reasons and carrying her only child in the vehicle frequently. “Good luck to the other driver.”
rjrjrjrj•1h ago
Doesn't fix braking distance, doesn't fix the increased chance of serious injury if a collision with a pedestrian occurs.