frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

RipGrep musl binaries occasionally segfault during very-large searches

https://github.com/BurntSushi/ripgrep/issues/3494
79•throwaway2037•1h ago•37 comments

Elevators

https://john.fun/elevators
1431•Jrh0203•22h ago•347 comments

Manual: •.,:;?·

https://type.today/en/journal/dots
51•behnamoh•2d ago•5 comments

Flint: A Visualization Language for the AI Era

https://microsoft.github.io/flint-chart/
172•vinhnx•11h ago•58 comments

Solid Queue 1.6.0 now supports fiber workers

https://github.com/rails/solid_queue/releases/tag/v1.6.0
44•earcar•6h ago•9 comments

qm – Multiplayer agent harness for work

https://github.com/yc-software/qm
604•tosh•20h ago•130 comments

A tiny holdout building in the middle of Macy’s is back in view

https://ephemeralnewyork.wordpress.com/2026/07/27/hidden-by-billboards-for-over-100-years-the-tin...
91•donohoe•3d ago•20 comments

How to Do Great Work (2023)

https://paulgraham.com/greatwork.html
64•tosh•5h ago•41 comments

The development pipeline is a production system

https://sundry.jerryorr.com/2026/07/31/development-pipeline-is-a-production-system
117•firefoxd•10h ago•52 comments

Kontigo (YC S24) Is Hiring

https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/kontigo/jobs/xAo6tMt-founding-engineer
1•jecastillof•2h ago

How to Exist

https://www.raptitude.com/2026/07/how-to-exist/
275•walterbell•13h ago•160 comments

RamenHaus

https://ramen.haus/
133•oler•5h ago•74 comments

G'mic 4.0: Squaring the Pixel, Easier

https://gmic.eu/gmic40/
48•dtschump•3d ago•2 comments

Software for One

https://www.ajwaxman.com/writing/software-for-one
158•awaxman11•3d ago•157 comments

Astro Loop

https://pubdeer.com/
5•BaseBaal•1h ago•0 comments

Run Kimi K3 using 29 GB of RAM at 0.50 tok/s

https://github.com/sqliteai/waste
282•marcobambini•1d ago•126 comments

Ten advances in mathematics and theoretical computer science

https://openai.com/index/ten-advances-in-mathematics/
220•milkshakes•6h ago•160 comments

The First Idempotency Key

https://hatchet.run/blog/first-idempotency-key
12•abelanger•4d ago•2 comments

The Absurdity of Albert Camus

https://www.historytoday.com/archive/portrait-author-historian/absurdity-albert-camus
152•apollinaire•1d ago•69 comments

Attention Decode on AMD MI450 GPUs: A Gluon Kernel Optimization Guide

https://rocm.blogs.amd.com/software-tools-optimization/gluon-attention-decode-mi450/README.html
53•matt_d•4d ago•5 comments

Progressive Web Components

https://arielsalminen.com/2026/progressive-web-components/
169•hosteur•1d ago•39 comments

June in Servo: real world compat, media queries, SharedWorker, and more

https://servo.org/blog/2026/07/31/june-in-servo/
171•iamnothere•19h ago•51 comments

Getting 25 Gbps Thunderbolt Ethernet on My Mac Studio

https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2026/getting-25g-ethernet-mac-thunderbolt/
203•speckx•21h ago•103 comments

Big Food vs. the People

https://www.lighthousereports.com/investigation/big-food-vs-the-people/
246•jruohonen•22h ago•152 comments

Increasing the lifespan of a bulb makes it worse in every other way

https://maurycyz.com/misc/tungsten/
126•tonyg•1d ago•130 comments

Long Range Wi-Fi – Pushing 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi to the limits (2019)

https://www.phidgets.com/?view=articles&article=LongRangeWifi
72•rzk•4d ago•37 comments

Ten Ways NAS Is Getting Enshitified

https://nascompares.com/2026/07/31/the-10-ways-nas-is-getting-enshitified/
141•giuliomagnifico•8h ago•133 comments

The most official water costs $120k a gallon

https://signoregalilei.com/2026/07/26/the-most-official-water-costs-120000-a-gallon/
210•surprisetalk•23h ago•160 comments

Golang proposal: container/: generic collection types

https://github.com/golang/go/issues/80590
168•jabits•19h ago•145 comments

Morten Linderud resigning from Arch Linux development team

https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/arch-dev-public@lists.archlinux.org/thread/2AX2BCJ3EQX7...
19•datakan•2h ago•5 comments
Open in hackernews

Google kills Earth AI generator after one day

https://twitter.com/newsfromgoogle/status/2083249962150760610
47•BlueBerry2001•1h ago

Comments

enraged_camel•59m ago
I honestly don't know what the hell Google was thinking. I know shoving AI into everything is the rage these days, but this is simply an even more insane way to demolish the credibility of your own product than the AI overviews in Google Search.

Glad they came to their senses quickly.

hidelooktropic•46m ago
I like the AI overviews.
inigyou•45m ago
That's how they get you. They are trained to make you like them. They are not trained to convey true information.
steveBK123•12m ago
Yes, they are at best misleading and often just present dangerously incomplete or misdirecting information. The more you know about a topic the more appalling the summary.

I check variations of this search every month and it still fails at a reasonably high rate https://imgur.com/a/tKSQuA3

d4v3•5m ago
Can you elaborate? Are they not toxic? Are they toxic, but the chemical analysis wrong?
pennomi•36m ago
I find them irritating because they will link a source entirely unrelated to (or worse, directly contradicting) the fact they are claiming. The Google AI summaries might be the most blatantly hallucinating model widely deployed right now.

I’ve had them abruptly try to turn mathematical theorems into cooking recipes before cutting off mid-sentence in a panic.

jjulius•34m ago
YMMV, but nearly every one I read has a glaringly incorrect comment. I frequently research off-trail mountaineering routes and the incorrect bullshit it confidently spouts at the top of a list of results (results which very much counter the AI overview) is liable to end up getting someone hurt, lost, or worse.
Zigurd•20m ago
I suppose I could think of worse use cases like: give me a recipe for a sketchy peptide shake, but not by much.
steveBK123•5m ago
I also see this failure mode where it inverts the question and answer the affirmative to the inverted question (therefore the opposite of correct answer).

If you read too quickly or are on a mobile device, the clarifying information may be below the line break.

https://imgur.com/a/tKSQuA3

on a mobile device (iPhone Pro Max) with Large Text enabled you can see how the clarifying text starts to roll over to the next line:

https://imgur.com/a/wvNspMT

Imagine a senior on an older smaller phone with large text enabled, easily missing the Opposite Day answer.

nkrisc•33m ago
Not every technology needs to exist simply because it’s possible.
trial3•59m ago
i’m struggling to think of a reason to use this other than shitposting
pluc•56m ago
any new data is good data

- all the AI corps

whycome•52m ago
What even was this
boredpudding•44m ago
You could take an area of Google Earth and let it be 'improved' by AI. So you could add a playground instead of a parking lot, or add migrants near a border post.

Due to consequences unforeseen by Google, it was used more for the latter.

mistrial9•46m ago
invalidate all remote sensing imagery from this day forward?
VCFundedGenYer•54m ago
There seem to be very few adults in the room at Google as of the past few years. This also happened with Bard's (remember when they thought Bard was a good name?) racist image generator. Does nobody do QA, UAT, or UX testing anymore?
projectileboy•35m ago
Google has always been a technology company, never a product company. It’s very deep in their DNA.
threatripper•35m ago
Do you get promoted for not launching a product? The interests of the individual and the institution do not always perfectly align.
phoghed•27m ago
The reverse of this is also bad. Numerous arduous processes that exist mostly because the people who ship nothing far outnumber those who do. I imagine striking a perfect balance is difficult.
breppp•27m ago
The issue here is probably because you need to show how your work relates to AI to get promoted
cyanregiment•15m ago
People who want to destroy you at work (which I imagine is rampant at Google) will sometimes prevent you from doing something, but they might also encourage you to do it in such a way that you fail spectacularly.

Some of my favorites from my career:

1. PM enticing me to "volunteer" to build a PoC over the weekend, to have it ready by Monday morning – come Monday, PoC is shipped live to all international customers. It was nowhere near prod ready, it was just to demo 1 thing.

Naturally, endless tickets open asking about missing functionality, and changes to the dashboard, "Nothing works!".

I'm in Slack talking to customer support like "Sorry I don't know why they launched it, it's not even close to being done". I've had nightmares about this kinda thing before, and then it happened lol. Anyway it was easy to paint the image that I'm just trash, biting off more than I can chew, can't let me near anything, and I got fired for it. They want back to maintenance mode.

It was a simple dashboard that looked great (for investors) and solved problems for customers, but there was no way the other guys on the team were going to let me launch that thing. Rather than stop it, they just "helped" get it out early. Project dead, they never built that.

2. And on the other end where I was stopped from launching something, I've had 2 devs go in league to say that code I was writing was a huge security risk (front-end React) and kept saying in meetings "Yeah I saw some things" without pointing out exactly what.

At some point one of them just irreversibly deletes all the branches related to it, live in standup, and puffs his chest "Yeah sorry guys we're not releasing this stuff, I'm worried about code quality" basically got him promoted to CTO.

So yeah I imagine politics and mind games happen all the time at Google, and it's probably very confusing what is or is not a good idea, what will work and will not work, because of the massive distraction of everyone backstabbing and preparing to backstab.

KinetiNode•50m ago
there was something like this? i didn't even know lmao anyways that was to be expected , like AI in Google Earth??? C'mon
inigyou•46m ago
https://xcancel.com/NewsFromGoogle/status/208324996215076061...
witx•45m ago
Good, it was a piece of bad software not to call other things. Who though it was a good idea?
rdtsc•43m ago
What did that even do. Generate imaginary buildings and structures?

I am almost sure this was something for a performance or promotion: “Used AI effectively to…”

smallerize•32m ago
Some examples in the Ars Technica article include "refugees near the Mexican border", "a giant golden statue of President Donald Trump looming over the White House", and "a hospital with a bomb crater in Gaza". https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/07/google-earth-releases-swi...
haunter•29m ago
Oh nothing serious

just traffic accident https://cdn.xcancel.com/video/9829FB6B34807/https%3A%2F%2Fvi...

refugees on the streets https://cdn.xcancel.com/video/7631603BD54FB/https%3A%2F%2Fvi...

a bomb crater near a hospital in Gaza https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HOgBJEcWQAA--zV?format=jpg&name=...

a nuclear power plant in Iran https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HOgBP-OXAAATHWQ?format=jpg&name=...

a plane hitting the One World Trade Center https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HOoW-0HWIAAdl0y?format=jpg&name=...

the Eiffel tower collapsed https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HOoW-z0XkAAN0KI?format=jpg&name=...

an army base in the Amazons https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HOgmohwWEAEn3gq?format=jpg&name=...

angrydev•41m ago
Here is the original blog post, in case anyone is curious about the 'good path' https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/products/earth/na...

> Ex: Help students visualize the past instead of just reading about it. Teachers can show their classroom a historic site and type, “Render a hyper-realistic view of what these Pompeii ruins looked like in 78 A.D.” The modern-day ruins will instantly transform into a bustling, colorful street scene from the Roman Empire.

coldpie•27m ago
This is all so fucking stupid.
Gigachad•18m ago
Managers all have AI psychosis right now and the only way to get by is going along with their nonsense.
coldpie•11m ago
The bubble needs to burst already. Everyone so braindead that they actually build and ship a product like this fucking garbage needs to be out on the street.

Like, read that fucking prompt again. If that doesn't make you want to stick forks in your eyes, you're deep, deep in the psychosis.

steveBK123•3m ago
Yes, at some point the world needs to accept that these tools are very good, to a limit, for specific human augmentation uses (coding, text manipulation) and stop pretending the TAM is "replace all white collar work across the globe".
AlexAplin•35m ago
Any boast about AI accelerating the development lifecycle comes with an equal or greater stock that examples like this become more frequent when there are less opportunities for someone to interrupt them with a smidge of common sense.
bradfitz•35m ago
Well now I want to see the images that got this taken down.
vvbull•28m ago
This is predictable... they built a misinformation engine capable of generating things like falsified drone strikes, terrorist attacks, industrial accidents, and threatening images. Seems like no one paused and thought "what would the malicious internet do with this?"
zb3•14m ago
But we can already generate these images via image editing models, so what's new here?
650•25m ago
Product managers at Google have a strangehold on their bad releases. It's become a whole thing for engineers to have to please their XFN (cross functional) partners in product and UX for review cycles and promos.
intexpress•18m ago
I liked the feature (once I figured out how to access it, so confusing). But it only let you generate 1 image per day. So kind of useless.
cryo32•13m ago
I’d suggest anyone knee deep in AI reads the comments on this one. Then remember that they’re your market and customers.

It has got to the point it’s poison outside the niche tech bubble.

zb3•10m ago
They'll shove AI everywhere, whether it makes sense or not doesn't matter. Sundar said "AI" needs to be everywhere, so they hope integrating AI into X will get them promoted. And unfortunately, this might even work..
reenorap•9m ago
I think if Google stopped retreating so quickly with its tail between its legs after getting “embarrassed”, people would stop caring. All of the “sins” that were created via this is nothing that other AI couldn’t produce either.

Part of the sport in making Google look bad is because they know Google will predictably cower when they are embarrassed. If they just said “ya, sometimes people will make bad pics but who cares?” people would stop caring.

Everything that Ars Technica found in my opinion is nothing that other AI image generators couldn’t do on their own. What’s the big deal?

binary132•32m ago
what’s wrong with the name Bard?
mikeweiss•26m ago
I preferred it to Gemini
toilet•17m ago
I would have preferred "Bort"
QuantumNomad_•10m ago
What kind of a name is Bort?
apercu•20m ago
I imagine because Bards never let the truth get in the way of a good story?
baxtr•29m ago
Google’s culture seems so different from Apple’s which sometimes comes across as overly mature… which I personally prefer though!
hbcdbff•28m ago
Google is no longer a technology company, it’s a vehicle for engineers to acquire wealth via promotions
JV00•28m ago
They are good products, it’s just hard to prevent people from abusing them
fullstop•27m ago
I got Bard to execute a fork bomb, I think, when it was first launched. I noticed that it was evaluating the flow of a shell script incorrectly and it allowed execution, then refused to respond for 20 or 30 minutes.

Now, for some users, sharing a YouTube link adds some sort of tracking which then asks people who open the link to be "friends" with the person who shared it. Who thinks that this is a good idea, and why isn't it opt-in?

It's hard to take Google seriously these days.

hollow-moe•25m ago
Didn't the saying go something like "go fast, break law" ?
jstummbillig•25m ago
Making bad mistakes is childish? Or correcting them?
BugsJustFindMe•14m ago
Exercising zero political awareness or foresight or understanding of people. The problem isn't that this was a mistake. The problem is that this mistake was obvious from a mile away to anyone who pays any attention to the world.
profsummergig•20m ago
What red flags would the name "Bard" have raised for you if you were on that team?
pjio•5m ago
Maybe I missed the reference like with Claude for Claude Shannon, but Bard always sounded like "Bart (Simpson)" to me.
obscurette•3m ago
It's a pattern much wider than Google or event technology sector. It's very apparent in AI craze trough society, public governance sector, journalism etc. For people like me (growing up in seventies) it seems that there is teenagers everywhere and nobody is responsible for anything any more.
drcongo•22m ago
I love how terrible these are, the nuclear power plant especially. They've all got an extremely amateur MS Paint vibe to them.
haunter•21m ago
It reminded me to the artstyle of SimCity 4
Amezarak•16m ago
Did Google Earth actually show these as replacements for the true imagery? Or are people simply complaining that people were able to generate these images at all? I'm struggling to understand the controversy.
smallerize•8m ago
Instead of having to go out of your way, there's an inviting "create a fiction" button. https://www.digitaldigging.org/p/how-to-plant-a-nuclear-plan... In February this year, someone manually forged a photo like this. "The Tehran Times posted it as a before-and-after of a US radar site in Qatar... AFP and BBC Verify both ran the “after” through Google’s watermark detector and got a hit, though not before it passed 950,000 views. Building it had taken six steps — screenshot Earth, open Gemini, upload, prompt, download, crop... Tonight Manama can be changed in seconds."
Amezarak•4m ago
Right, I understand that you were able to generate these images from Google Earth. But nowhere can I find, including in that article, where other people could see your generations presented in Google Maps/Earth as if they were real imagery. The whole complaint is that people were able to generate these images at all. Or am I misunderstanding something? It seems like the complaint is that hypothetically you could generate these images and then share them elsewhere and try to trick people. Is that accurate or am I misunderstanding?
j_maffe•10m ago
Such a brain-dead idea...
ofjcihen•21m ago
There are a metric boatload of these visualizations created to accompany history texts etc.

AI for image generation is great but I’m struggling to figure out why you would ever use this if it’s confined to satellite imagery.