Support SEIU organizing them (their fighting the good fight in this case), but this specific article is clickbait.
Allied United is one of the larger security augmentation firms in the nation, which makes is harder. For example, my Alma mater was secured by Allied Universal as well as a dedicated PD because the dedicated PD didn't want to be bag check for a library when they have been dealing with real crime (eg. A comrade in their sister PD across town's was shot by the Boston marathon bombers).
Is it? In Portuguese it's thousand, million, billion, trillion... (Milhar, milhão, bilhão, trilhão, ...)
- You're absolutely right!
These billionaires who have always relied on the power of the state for their security and asserting their property are absolutely delusional if they think they can keep it without it.
When states collapse, the one who emerge victorious aren't the well-mannered business people, it's the warlords (a.k.a. the heads of organized crime).
Except they can. Anthropic could just hire their own security for when the other guys go on strike.
wonderwonder•1h ago
bpodgursky•1h ago
ceejayoz•1h ago
bpodgursky•1h ago
But, historically, strongmen/chieftains have not had incredible trouble keeping their goons under control. Most threats from from palace coups not popular revolt. Most normal people in uncertain times like order and aren't going to flip the table on a system that gives them stability, food and shelter.
ceejayoz•57m ago
Sure. But some of them seize power from others on their way up via force.
nemomarx•45m ago
GolfPopper•11m ago
stymaar•28m ago
Yup, but those aren't the same people as the one who get to become tech billionaires.
john_strinlai•59m ago
dayvid•53m ago
inigyou•49m ago
derwiki•1h ago
toomuchtodo•41m ago
wrash-qwtr•33m ago
toomuchtodo•30m ago
I'll eat a hat live at Demo Day if this ever happens. Until then, it's just more authoritarian tech bro bluster. Pick better cult leaders is my advice. The Boring Company has taken 5 years to complete 2.2 miles of the Vegas Loop. Better get started on those granite caverns now.
https://tenor.com/search/yeah-sure-okay-gifs
https://elonmusk.today/
https://gizmodo.com/elon-musk-no-one-gets-free-bread-until-i...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_predictions_for_autono...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vegas_Loop
https://blog.ucs.org/steven-higashide/transportation-profess...
https://finance.yahoo.com/technology/ai/articles/predictions...
philipallstar•1h ago
zbentley•1h ago
Awful, but not without historical precedent.
philipallstar•1h ago
Tade0•50m ago
somenameforme•44m ago
Grunts under coercion has a rich history that's still ongoing, but these sort of guards are those that would have both weapons and the guarded in their direct vicinity. I can't think of any historic example where this wasn't the loyalest of the loyal types.
jcranmer•15m ago
stymaar•
tracerbulletx•1h ago
js8•26m ago
For example, how Mallory can gain power over Alice and Bob who don't directly communicate.
First, Mallory tells Alice: "I am stronger than you. If you don't do what I say I'll kill you." So Alice decides to submit.
Then, Mallory takes Alice to Bob and says to him: "Together with Alice we are stronger than you, and kill you if you don't do what I want." So Bob submits.
This only works if Bob doesn't talk to Alice, otherwise they would together see the empty threat.
With more people, it becomes a bit trickier but hopefully you see how blocking communication helps to gain power over people. Often the blocking of communication is done through propaganda, e.g. Mallory might entice Alice and Bob to hate each other, so they wouldn't get together and figure he's the manipulator. Or Mallory might just kill someone randomly to motivate people not to talk to each other.
Anyway, this shows the importance of free speech (which is really a misnomer; it should be called a right to listen). If you can freely talk (and listen) to other people, you reduce your chances to being subjugated by someone.
(This is also why in a war, people are incentivized to dehumanize the other party and not to listen what they say, because together they could figure out that the real enemy are the war profiteers on both sides, colluding. And besides, killing is the most reliable way of silencing someone. That's why people should also universally reject killing - based on someone else's word - unless they are directly threatened themselves.)
sailfast•42m ago