frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Run Qwen 3.8 Flash Next (125B) on consumer hardware (RTX 4090) at 100T/s

https://github.com/Niko1221/Strata
420•snehesht•6h ago•223 comments

A map of every lighthouse

https://mapped.earth/lighthouses/world
104•karakoram•2d ago•51 comments

'Neanderthals Among Us' review

https://www.historytoday.com/archive/review/neanderthals-among-us-peter-sahlins-review
22•pepys•23h ago•9 comments

Results from the Jane Street hardware puzzle

https://blog.janestreet.com/asic-puzzle-results/
29•eru•2d ago•2 comments

Show HN: Glashütte Trash Clock – A 30-minute pendulum clock made from trash

https://niklasroy.com/gtc/
134•r0r0•2d ago•16 comments

Tell HN: Bob Cringely has died

745•paveworld•18h ago•156 comments

A Minsky machine in ncurses terminfo

https://seriot.ch/computation/terminfo/
24•beefburger•2d ago•4 comments

How to scale intent, quality, and artistry with AI [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLvFTMtw4Jk
9•simonjgreen•11h ago•1 comments

Show HN: AI search for every photo and every frame of video on macOS

https://github.com/allenv0/SCM
102•allenleee•10h ago•56 comments

VGHF Digital Archive passes 5000 magazines. Here's what's next

https://gamehistory.org/5k-magazines/
92•rdmuser•10h ago•16 comments

Why don't more developers “use the platform”?

https://nolanlawson.com/2026/10/03/why-dont-more-developers-use-the-platform/
254•vinhnx•15h ago•253 comments

Building a RAG pipeline for semantic code search

https://blog.jetbrains.com/ai/2026/09/building-a-rag-pipeline-for-semantic-code-search-a-develope...
23•saikatsg•1h ago•3 comments

The work by Valve's Timur Kristóf on improving old AMD GPUs on Linux

https://www.phoronix.com/news/XDC-2026-Valve-Timur-AMDGPU
430•speckx•1d ago•83 comments

The dot and the Swarm: Benefitting from the bitter lesson

https://www.oneusefulthing.org/p/the-dot-and-the-swarm
3•bluepeter•2d ago•0 comments

The Heilbronn Problem

https://math.tejstead.com/heilbronn/
51•tejstead•1d ago•10 comments

Emitting metadata early makes building/checking Rust up to twice as fast

https://github.com/PowderworksCode/headstart
102•knuckleheads•13h ago•27 comments

Second Chances

https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2026/10/22/second-chances-office-politics-wilfrid-sheed/
3•samclemens•20h ago•0 comments

Surely you have ultra-wideband radios on your bins too?

https://sjg.io/writing/binrange-have-you-actually-put-the-bins-out/
109•simonjgreen•23h ago•60 comments

What is going on with ceiling fans

https://mcmansionhell.com/post/829127919552151552/what-is-going-on-with-ceiling-fans
115•colinprince•3d ago•93 comments

Agents don't need memory, they need documentation

https://liao.gg/blog/agents-dont-need-memory
315•kmeh•1d ago•194 comments

cp: -r or -R?

https://movq.de/blog/postings/2026-09-30/0/POSTING-en.html
51•zdw•4d ago•72 comments

Treachery in the Rodin Museum 3D scan verdict

https://cosmowenman.substack.com/p/rodin-museum-3d-scan-verdict
292•CosmoWenman•1d ago•163 comments

Bill Draper has died

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/30/technology/william-draper-dead.html
17•bookofjoe•7h ago•6 comments

Former SR-71 engineer talks NASA's Blackbird revival program

https://www.twz.com/air/former-sr-71-engineer-talks-nasas-blackbird-revival-program
91•rkagerer•1d ago•63 comments

LeCun has "zero concerns" about AI wiping out humanity, recent "rogue" incidents

https://fortune.com/2026/10/01/ai-godfather-yann-lecun-has-zero-concerns-about-human-extinction-s...
336•Anon84•1d ago•611 comments

Magic Switch: Share Apple Magic keyboard/track-pad/mouse between two Macs

https://joshua.hu/magic-switch-easily-switch-magic-keyboard-trackpad-mouse-between-mac-macbook-macos
69•chanux•2d ago•35 comments

What's the future for pure math research in the age of AI?

https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2026/09/whats-the-future-for-pure-math-research-in-the-age-of...
47•6bitquant•11h ago•34 comments

Hole Punch: Sling your spaceship around gravitational fields

https://notoriousbfg.com/hole-punch/
345•trwhite•1d ago•85 comments

Celebrating the 100th birthday of the kidney donated to him as a teenager

https://www.whec.com/top-news/webster-man-celebrating-the-100th-birthday-of-the-kidney-his-mom-do...
259•gscott•3d ago•58 comments

L-systems generate weevils, pizza toppings, and matriarchal lineages

https://blog.plover.com/2026/09/25/
12•surprisetalk•2d ago•3 comments
Open in hackernews

Software Engineering Is Dead. Long Live Product Engineering

https://newsletter.chainofthought.show/p/software-engineering-is-dead-long
25•cliffclimber•1h ago

Comments

pmarreck•55m ago
There's still plenty of innovation in the software space. Look at Roc-lang, for example. Fairly ideal as a human-agent collaborative language.
betteryet•54m ago
Software Engineering is not dead, damn it. Anything research and original is not dead. Are these things fantastic at connecting concepts, producing digital work products, and putting out derivate hypotheses? Sure. But proper original thought is still firmly in the realm of humans. Though speed of propagation of new ideas probably did change massively.
flowerlad•48m ago
> Anything research and original is not dead.

Even if are right here (and I think you are), software engineering can still be dead. 95% of software engineers are not doing research or doing anything original.

almogo•48m ago
In a way, many “novel” ideas are mathematical restructurings of existing ideas. I think we’ve seen a fair number of examples by now, especially in the realm of mathematics, of LLMs producing these novel ideas. I’d imagine Lee Se-dol would agree.
flowerlad•45m ago
> LLMs producing these novel ideas

We haven't seen that in software development though. Chris Lattner, inventor of the Swift programming language recently took a look at a compiler entirely written by Claude AI. Lattner found nothing innovative in the code generated by AI [1]. And this is why humans will be needed to advance the state of the art.

[1] https://www.modular.com/blog/the-claude-c-compiler-what-it-r...

ranger_danger•36m ago
Was said Claude AI prompted to even attempt to look for anything "innovative" or just make more of the same? The same can be said of humans if one isn't already intentionally trying to do something different.
almogo•15m ago
That is a useful data point. I think there’s interesting points in both directions, but probably what’s the most important is that it’s a field of humans have been researching and optimizing very heavily for a while. Whatever fruits there are to reap our probably quite difficult to find.
ranger_danger•38m ago
> But proper original thought is still firmly in the realm of humans

Copying isn't just how design works, it's how everything works. Humans are imitation machines.

We create new things by collecting, regurgitating and mutating stuff we experience, just like LLMs. In a vacuum man has no ideas outside of base impulses.

Hence why originality is a novice belief. The closer you get to any field, the more you realize the stories around who made all the breakthroughs are BS media narratives. Most if not all steps forward in any field have hundreds of people clawing at similar ideas concurrently.

yourapostasy•51m ago
I largely buy this thesis.

I think the space where juniors can thrive in this New Normal is to fill in the gaps in written form. Seniors don't know what we know. I'm constantly finding implicit knowledge I assume a junior possesses that they in fact, do not have an inkling that it even exists. Lo and behold, the loops and harnesses don't, either. That's why they come to me asking the questions they ask in the first place.

Holding that brief junior perspective, filling in those innumerable gaps while learning everything else being thrown at them via the agents, is critical at this juncture for the agents to be able to bootstrap themselves from ever-broader, ever-vaguer initial instructions. When those potholes are mostly filled, I can think of a lot of other stuff for juniors to work upon, but I am sorely missing this piece with agents at this stage of their evolution, and I definitionally am unable to fill it myself. It is the source of most of my rework of their code output.

chasd00•47m ago
The line between Computer Science and Software Engineering is pretty blurry and the term "Software Engineering" has been controversial from the get go. Bolting together established enterprise patterns may be dead but creative problem solving with automation and the science of computers surely is not.
j45•46m ago
Software development evolves. Every decade. Or faster. Always has, and always will.
trentnix•40m ago
It’s not dead, but it’s starting to feel nostalgic. There will always be a few (of us) who still read the code, like the old school “operator” from The Matrix. And maybe the software geeks that still read code will be better for it, but that will eventually be just at the boundaries.