edit: these are not the prices I see at https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing/
This move is most likely the DeepSeek team just making efforts to phase it out.
This is no different from AWS charging higher prices for hosting Kubernetes/MySQL/etc. versions that are end-of-life. Keep your stuff maintained and upgrade, to free up the resources.
https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/model-pric...
I don't know if this even counts as newsworthy, prices are too volatile. Speaking of, wasn't this model released a few months ago? It must be getting close to being obsolete by now.
https://www.straitstimes.com/business/china-plans-ai-export-...
xvxvx•1h ago
I’m just here for the fallout. The businesses who jettisoned their talent in favor of cheap AI garbage. The ones who have seen obvious degradation in work quality and stability, but who have tried to ignore or hide it. They now have to face down CFO’s and executive management who see zero returns on the current spend and are being asked to approve extreme budget increases.
A 230% increase isn’t even a big jump. Try 1000%. That may not even be enough to cover the costs and turn a profit for AI companies.
InsideOutSanta•48m ago
999900000999•37m ago
If there's a grand realization that AI isn't magic, let's just say I'm not optimistic.
torben-friis•17m ago
jubilee33•37m ago
Most humans demand too much and bring little to the table. Real talent is very rare and it mostly wants to work for itself if it can.
flohofwoe•32m ago
gigatree•12m ago
sz4kerto•30m ago
Hm, there must be businesses like this, but I presume there are many who experience huge returns on current spend - and even 5x costs would be fine, but currently AI prices (given fixed 'intelligence') are dropping like a stone. I can't imagine that the same level of intelligence is going to be more expensive in 12 months.
It's just normal that there's a huge variation of how businesses and individuals adapt to new circumstances, this has been the case forever.