> Would love feedback on the … DX

Is it that the two extra characters 'an' in 'titan' are so difficult to type for the CLI, or is it just for the giggles when you 'dev'?

TBH, the idea seems way outdated for the current state of software engineering. The Rust compiler provides a massive benefit for AI Coding because it literally catches all the failure cases, so all AI have to do is implement the logical parts, which is usually a no-brainer for something like a Claude Code or Codex.

For example, the https://github.com/SaynaAI/sayna has been mostly Claude Code + me reviewing the stuff + some small manual touches if needed, but for the most part, I have found that Claude Code writes way more stable Rust code than JS.

It would be easier and safer to give the JS code to a translator and have it translate it into Rust, and then continue AI Dev with Rust, than to invest time in an automated compiler from JS to Rust. IMHO!

One of your merits listed is "Pure JavaScript developer experience". I don't think most devs, even JS devs would consider this a merit lol. Cool project either way.

Tit? Really? Just two more letters.

Second, how does concurrency (like promises) translate to rust ?

I guess as long as you have basically no business logic, perhaps it makes sense to orchestrate route handling in Rust?

But Boa is very very slow compared to JIT compiled JavaScript. As soon as your business logic starts trying to stand up and walk I think you’ll start hitting request latency sadness.

    const body = JSON.stringify({
        model: "gpt-4.1-mini",
        messages: [{ role: "user", content: "hii" }]
    });

    const r = t.fetch("https://api.openai.com/v1/chat/completions", {
        method: "POST",
        headers: {
            "Content-Type": "application/json",
            "Authorization": `Bearer ${API_KEY}`
        },
        body
    });

    const json = JSON.parse(r.body);

.. no async? i wonder how they are doing this & how they plan on more js interop

While the idea is somewhat new for today's JS. And I see some benefits for this to make single-purpose servers compiled into tiny binaries. I believe it would take some time to make this popular. You should to find the niche where it's required right now. And also I would spend more time working on marketing: explainer, documentation, landing page. For example now the readme looks too ai-written

What's about code and DX: it's not a good practice to export anything using globals, this is what JS world refused to do long ago. It turns your code into a hardly debuggable mess quickly

> you write routes and logic in JavaScript, and the CLI compiles everything into a single Rust + Axum binary using the Boa JS engine

It's not clear to me how this would have better performance than plain Node.js, which is a C++ binary using the V8 JS engine.

It looks like you're handling routing in Rust, but this seems unlikely to move the needle measurably. In fact, it could be hurting you - you're basically betting that the rust program (route request + invoke JS interpreter + marshal data) is faster than the much simpler JavaScript program (route request). That doesn't seem likely.