The core idea is local-first compliance: – risk classification (Articles 5–15, incl. prohibited use cases) – bias evaluation using CrowS-Pairs – automatic Annex IV–oriented PDF reports – no cloud services or external APIs (browser-based + Ollama)
I’m especially interested in feedback on whether this kind of technical framing of AI regulation makes sense in real-world projects.
Given the timeline of the commits and some other tells (e.g. using forwardRef despite using React 19 which deprecates it), it seems like you used coding assistants extensively. That's a personal preference, but I would mention that explicitly (if that's the case), if only for intellectual honesty.
You’re right that the commit history doesn’t fully reflect the raw development process. I did some cleanup and squashing before publishing, since this is an open-source project and I wanted the history to be readable and reviewable.
I do use coding assistants as part of my workflow, mostly for iteration speed and boilerplate, but the architectural decisions, evaluation logic, and compliance mapping are intentional and manually reasoned through.
Happy to clarify any part of the implementation or assumptions if something looks odd.
If something gets built with AI or not at all, that’s a net positive as far as I’m concerned.
Also just from the data that has been shared with me chargebacks/complaints/nitpicking/stinginess alone from this region seems to demoralizing compared to Americans/East Asia
We have this idealized view of a rich affluent "Europe" born from Marshall Plan but that certainly is not the actual reality today.
These are not "anti-business regulations".
Regulation is made to protect customers. Consumer trust is favorable to business in the long run.
It's really sad that US technologists confuse business and grift these days. Maybe it's related to their main customers being VCs, and the people using service just being props needed to have the line go up.
The Official EU AI Act Compliance Regulation Conformance Tool MMXXVI v1.0
If you are one patch version behind, you are "non-complaint" and you will get fined immediately.
We <3 EU!
Signed, an American who is fed up with adslop and saasslop propaganda. Do not reward immoral megacorps.
Not knocking Europe, but there's too much of a tendency online to picture Europe as some kind of Disneyland. Some of this is down to Americans who only know Europe from two-week holidays and picture it as a holiday utopia, some of it is Europeans who only know America from reality television and picture it as a hellscape.
Pop discourse != reality.
degrowth decels are a scourge
To name a few.
dmitrygr•11h ago
petcat•10h ago
hiepler•10h ago
The name is meant literally as “EU conformity” (EU + conform), not “you conform”.
I was aiming for something that signals regulatory alignment without sounding legal-heavy, but I get how it can read differently.