My assumption was that AI-generated code would make reviews easier because criticism of the code wouldn't feel like criticism of the author.

Instead, I've repeatedly seen people strongly defend AI generated code, and sometimes even defend AI explanations that are demonstrably incorrect.

Is anyone else seeing this?

If so, what do you think is driving it? How are you handling it within your team?

Also, has anyone found effective ways to reduce the influence of "leading question" prompts?

I very much want to keep human in the loop style paradigm within our teams, but at the same time I do wonder if my life would get a whole lot easier if instead we jumped on the "loop/factory/vibe" train.