Hello, 2008, my old friend I've come to talk with you again…
The deal was “if a business spends a percentage this money on payroll, it will be forgive”. It was designed to keep businesses afloat for a set amount of time as we locked down for COVID.
One is based on reason, where people look for contradictions (like you're doing right now) in order to better understand truth.
The other is based on authority or faith, where people look to authority figures, such as parents, priests, pundits, or politicians, in order to understand "truth".
These are incompatible. You can't point out contradictions to an authority oriented person and expect them to care. While you are using your words, they have already made off with the money. Your reason got you nowhere, while their power got them $50k+ loans. They could do what they did with action while you are soothing yourself with words.
One thing authority oriented people understand is that actions matter most and that the highest truth is found within action on the physical world.
I thought she was only hired to shut it down…
They wouldn’t just lie to us, guys?
The US Department of Education is known for their aggressive collection tactics, including garnishing of wages, taking tax returns and seizing homes and cars. I even heard of a single mother who had her child support taken away because she owed money to a fraudulent vocational school.
The US government is openly hostile to those who do business with them, and to their citizens and should be avoided at all costs.
Further, the FBAR reporting requirements. I have retirement money in Canada that makes no financial sense to divest yet, and I spent 5-6 hours filing an FBAR this year because the online form doesn't support OSX at all, and I simply could not get an Adobe Acrobat Reader to install on Apple silicon, so I had to rebuild a crappy Dell laptop in order to meet my legal requirements.
Now, I get requiring some sort of reporting requirements to stop tax evasion and the like, but the tax filing requirement is not based on anything like net worth, but rather if you are a US citizen you must file (US is one of I think 2 countries in the world with this requirement). And the FBAR requirement is anything up to or over $10k in a foreign bank.
For real?
If I sound like I am complaining, why don't you walk a mile in my moccasins.
#Edit - fixing an autocorrect typo.
Just sayin’
Student loans are an odious conflict of interest. People will hold themselves in disbelief that we offered predatory "no risk" loans to literal children, burdening their entire futures with decisions made before they had the faculties to consider it. The moral hazard of protecting a class of loans from completely irresponsible lending alone is enough before even looking at the consequences for the people who took them.
Then you have second and third order effects... Authoritarians don't consult experts believing they know better so Nth order effects of short sighted policy are authoritarian kryptonite. Nth order effects have a way of asserting themselves into reality and breaking through authoritarian denial about the state of reality and nobody is happy when reality asserts itself.
josefritzishere•3h ago
hiatus•3h ago
throw-the-towel•2h ago
flerchin•2h ago
hiatus•2h ago
0xfaded•2h ago
I was lucky enough to grow up and go to university in another country. The magnitude of the financial decisions I was making at the time were < 1k and I remembered how much money that felt like.
IMHO blaming people for 100k bad financial decisions made under duress just as they entered adulthood is victim blaming.
nyarlathotep_•1h ago
Especially when the implied social contract broke down--i.e low wages, horrific increases in the cost of living, limited opportunities.
It's pretty common to find people that regret taking the loans to go to school and got little value from their education.
ru552•2h ago
toomuchtodo•2h ago
If we’re going to keep speed running the decline of the US, it’s a fine strategy. The people making these choices will be long dead by the time the consequences arrive.
andsoitis•2h ago
How come?
toomuchtodo•2h ago
hiatus•2h ago
toomuchtodo•2h ago
[argument withdrawn]
hiatus•2h ago
> I’m sure you’d have no problem burning millions of dollars of VC funding on a low value business idea, as if that would be of superior economic value.
You know absolutely nothing about me.
justinrubek•2h ago
hiatus•2h ago
bdcravens•2h ago
toomuchtodo•2h ago
hiatus•2h ago
toomuchtodo•2h ago
Debt is not written in stone. It is always negotiable, and only sometimes enforceable. There is no morality around debt, so I’m unsure why the strong feels around why this debt can’t be forgiven or renegotiated.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debt:_The_First_5,000_Years
ezfe•2h ago
el-berg•2h ago
bdcravens•2h ago
techpineapple•2h ago
enraged_camel•2h ago
tacticalturtle•2h ago
> “Involuntary collections will not occur before 2025," a White House spokesperson said in a statement. "Defaulted borrowers won’t see collections until 2025.”
https://subscriber.politicopro.com/article/2024/10/biden-adm...
smileson2•2h ago
dfedbeef•2h ago
hiatus•2h ago
dfedbeef•2h ago
hiatus•2h ago
disambiguation•2h ago
hiatus•2h ago
fnordpiglet•2h ago
hiatus•2h ago
[1]: https://www.bestcolleges.com/research/average-student-loan-d...
tacticalturtle•2h ago
In other states, for example Texas, it’s a little over $3000 a year on average for in state:
https://www.communitycollegereview.com/tuition-stats/texas#:...
That’s much cheaper than the tens of thousands for a public 4 year university.
And we should point out that for trades, you are getting paid in an apprenticeship. That’s better than cheap or free.
disambiguation•1h ago
hiatus•1h ago
hayst4ck•2h ago
Many of these loans are handed out predatorily to people classified as children, 6-8 years before their higher level thinking pre-frontal cortex fully develops, with no life experience, little work experience, a wide range in quality of parenting and childhood, with a society that has said "this is how you achieve the American dream of doing better than your parents."
The loans themselves shield the lender from consequences and put risk squarely on the the loan taker.
The seeming goal of these loans being the same for most of the structure of American society, to ensure desperate workers that have no freedom and no ability to say no to businesses.
When society offered these loans to people who in no way would have been able to get them on fundamentals, which was already a failure of society to invest in the future, there was an implicit promise that they would lead to a better life and they didn't.
You can't blame societies young for believing what their elders and even society at large tells them.
Universities failed their students, society failed students and universities, our own culture decayed in terms of earning vs receiving credentials, and the people you want to pay the cost of that are the people that the system victimized the most?
Ekaros•1h ago
Seems like most reasonable first step to take.
toomuchtodo•1h ago
piva00•1h ago
There's no easy solution to this, it's structural, it's systemic, the model the USA uses for higher-ed funding is structurally unsound and unsustainable. Replacement the model can only be done through a measured policy change but I don't see much of that coming from the US in the past 10-15 years, it's mostly flailing around with no clear vision for what it wants to be in the future, just an everlasting chase for GDP growth no matter how, at some point this narrow objective comes crashing down.
hayst4ck•1h ago
We don't make people take out loans for K-12. Education is an investment. It should be funded, just not in a way that is so rife with conflicts of interest. Everyone benefits from an educated society except priests and other kinds of authoritarians.
hiatus•30m ago
bdcravens•2h ago
mingus88•2h ago
Could it be that many in DC benefited from that free money, and are also benefitting from the status quo of unaffordable education?
bsnnkv•2h ago