frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

Show HN: Tell the world why you unfollowed/muted a social media account

https://tinmute.com/
1•abzgupta•54s ago•0 comments

Is AI the end of coding as we know it, or just another tool?

https://www.aha.io/engineering/articles/is-ai-the-end-of-coding-or-just-another-tool
1•FigurativeVoid•1m ago•0 comments

WordPress Turmoil and the Fair Package Manager

https://thenewstack.io/wordpress-turmoil-and-the-fair-package-manager/
1•CrankyBear•2m ago•0 comments

The Pragmatic Engineer 2025 Survey: What's in your tech stack?

https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/the-pragmatic-engineer-2025-survey
3•iLemming•3m ago•0 comments

Graph Continuous Thought Machines

1•Sai-dewa•6m ago•2 comments

Show HN: McClane – Done-for-you lead drops from Facebook group conversations

https://mcclane.super.site/
1•nickalex•7m ago•1 comments

Silicon Valley, à la Française

https://semiwiki.com/artificial-intelligence/358042-silicon-valley-a-la-francaise/
1•rbanffy•8m ago•0 comments

Energy expenditure and obesity across the economic spectrum

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2420902122
1•bookofjoe•10m ago•0 comments

TikTok Creator Sued by Sylvanian Doll Maker over Brand Promotions

https://www.independent.ie/business/irish/sylvanian-families-toy-firm-in-settlement-talks-with-kildare-tiktok-star-over-parody-videos-featuring-japanese-companys-dolls/a1813361842.html
1•valgaze•11m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: Time to Pivot Out of Engineering?

1•bdnsj•11m ago•0 comments

Where's Firefox Going Next?

https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/where-s-firefox-going-next-you-tell-us/m-p/100698#M39094
2•ReadCarlBarks•13m ago•0 comments

Views of the U.S. have worsened while opinions of China have improved in surveys

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/07/15/views-of-the-us-have-worsened-while-opinions-of-china-have-improved-in-many-surveyed-countries/
5•alphabetatango•14m ago•0 comments

BlackRock hit by $52B withdrawal from single client

https://www.thetimes.com/business-money/companies/article/blackrock-hit-by-52bn-withdrawal-from-single-client-kmsmg87jc
2•alexcos•15m ago•1 comments

Tried Comet: Impressive AI Tool with Concerns About Future Risks

https://twitter.com/TenZorroAI/status/1945224617859113401
1•paulo20223•17m ago•1 comments

Power-seeking, by any person, may be equivalent to minimizing uncertainty

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/KYxpkoh8ppnPfmuF3/power-seeking-minimising-free-energy
1•OgsyedIE•17m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: Why Marketing Software Hasn't Had Its 'Cursor Moment' Yet

1•richbelt•20m ago•2 comments

Fighting Brandolini's Law with Sampling

https://brady.fyi/fact-checking/
1•h-bradio•20m ago•0 comments

Differential geometry of ML: a geometric interpretation of gradient descent

https://research.fal.ai/blog/differential-geometry-of-ml/
1•felineflock•20m ago•0 comments

Sci-Fi, Fantasy, Fandom in the Norman vs. Lamb Gothic Fantasy Collection

https://internetarchivecanada.org/2025/07/15/science-fiction-fantasy-and-fandom-in-the-norman-v-lamb-gothic-fantasy-collection/
2•lintalist•23m ago•1 comments

Hacker Residency in Da Nang Vietnam with Tony Dinh

https://www.hackerresidencygroup.com
1•transitivebs•24m ago•1 comments

Cambridge academic James Orr: England should be ethnically English [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UngibqLwJ34
2•donsupreme•25m ago•1 comments

Product Innovation is Discovery not Creation

https://boz.com/articles/product-discovery
1•pizzathyme•27m ago•0 comments

Mastodon 4.4 Is Here

https://www.patreon.com/posts/mastodon-4-4-is-134090971
2•doener•28m ago•0 comments

After a Decade of Chaos, Google Is Finally Getting Its Act Together

https://gizmodo.com/after-a-decade-of-chaos-google-is-finally-getting-its-act-together-2000629697
1•mikece•28m ago•1 comments

How to Cool Down Computers Inside of an A320 [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQuc_HhW6VA
1•sarimkx•30m ago•0 comments

Investigation confirms majority of community grievances in Socfin plantations

https://news.mongabay.com/short-article/two-year-investigation-confirms-majority-of-community-grievances-in-socfin-plantations/
1•PaulHoule•31m ago•0 comments

AWS launches Kiro, an agentic AI IDE

https://www.techradar.com/pro/aws-launches-kiro-an-agentic-ai-ide-to-end-the-chaos-of-vibe-coding
1•mikece•32m ago•0 comments

The FIPS 140-3 Go Cryptographic Module

https://go.dev/blog/fips140
3•FiloSottile•34m ago•0 comments

Piccolo: Powerful async ORM, query builder, and admin GUI

https://piccolo-orm.com/
1•akkad33•34m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Voice AI Based Visa Interview Prep

https://app.toughtongueai.com/collections/685906c3a2320018923dcaaf/
1•ajabhish•34m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Show HN: I built a Ruby gem that handles memoization with a ttl

https://github.com/mishalzaman/memo_ttl
48•hp_hovercraft84•2mo ago
I built a Ruby gem for memoization with TTL + LRU cache. It’s thread-safe, and has been helpful in my own apps. Would love to get some feedback: https://github.com/mishalzaman/memo_ttl

Comments

locofocos•2mo ago
Can you pitch me on why I would want to use this, instead of Rails.cache.fetch (which supports TTL) powered by redis (with the "allkeys-lru" config option)?
film42•2mo ago
Redis is great for caching a customer config that's hit 2000 times/second by your services, but even then, an in-mem cache with short TTL would make redis more tolerant to failure. This would be great for the in-mem part.
thomascountz•2mo ago
I'm not OP nor have I read through all the code, but this gem has no external dependencies and runs in a single process (as does activesupport::Cache::MemoryStore). Could be a "why you should," or a "why you should not" use this gem, depending on your use case.
hp_hovercraft84•2mo ago
Good question. I built this gem because I needed a few things that Rails.cache (and Redis) didn’t quite fit:

- Local and zero-dependency. It caches per object in memory, so no Redis setup, no serialization, no network latency. -Isolated and self-managed. Caches aren’t global. Each object/method manages its own LRU + TTL lifecycle and can be cleared with instance helpers. - Easy to use — You just declare the method, set the TTL and max size, and you're done. No key names, no block wrapping, no external config.

JamesSwift•2mo ago
For what its worth, ActiveSupport::CacheStore is a really flexible api that gives minimal contractual obligations (read_entry, write_entry, delete_entry is the entire set of required methods), but still allows you to layer specific functionality (eg TTL) on top with an optional 'options' param. You could get the best of both worlds by adhering to that contract and then people can swap in eg redis cache store if they wanted a network-shared store.

EDIT: see https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/main/activesupport/lib/a...

hp_hovercraft84•2mo ago
That's actually a really good idea! I'll definitely consider this in a future update. Thanks!
qrush•2mo ago
Congrats on shipping your first gem!!

I found this pretty easy to read through. I'd suggest setting a description on the repo too so it's easy to find.

https://github.com/mishalzaman/memo_ttl/blob/main/lib/memo_t...

hp_hovercraft84•2mo ago
As in identify where the source code is in the README?
zerocrates•2mo ago
I think they mean just set a description for the repo in github (set using the gear icon next to "About"), saying what the project is. That description text can come up in github searches and google searches.
film42•2mo ago
Nice! In rails I end up using Rails.cache most of the time because it's always "right there" but I like how you break out the cache to be a per-method to minimize contention. Depending on your workload it might make sense to use a ReadWrite lock instead of a Monitor.

Only suggestion is to not wrap the error of the caller in your memo wrapper.

> raise MemoTTL::Error, "Failed to execute memoized method '#{method_name}': #{e.message}"

It doesn't look like you need to catch this for any operational or state tracking reason so IMO you should not catch and wrap. When errors are wrapped with a string like this (and caught/ re-raised) you lose the original stacktrace which make debugging challenging. Especially when your error is like, "pg condition failed for select" and you can't see where it failed in the driver.

hp_hovercraft84•2mo ago
Thanks for the feedback! That's a very good point, I'll update the gem and let it bubble up.
JamesSwift•2mo ago
I thought ruby would auto-wrap the original exception as long as you are raising from a rescue block (i.e. as long as $! is non-nil). So in that case you can just

  raise "Failed to execute memoized method '#{method_name}'"
And ruby will set `cause` for you

https://pablofernandez.tech/2014/02/05/wrapped-exceptions-in...

film42•2mo ago
TIL! That's pretty cool. I still think if you have no reason to catch an error (i.e. state tracking, etc.) then you should not.
gurgeous•2mo ago
This is neat, thanks for posting. I am using memo_wise in my current project (TableTennis) in part because it allows memoization of module functions. This is a requirement for my library.

Anyway, I ended up with a hack like this, which works fine but didn't feel great.

   def some_method(arg)
     @_memo_wise[__method__].tap { _1.clear if _1.length > 100 }
     ...
   end
   memo_wise :some_method
JamesSwift•2mo ago
Looks good. Id suggest making your `get` wait to acquire the lock until needed. eg instead of

  @lock.synchronize do
    entry = @store[key]
    return nil unless entry

    ...
you can do

  entry = @store[key]
  return nil unless entry

  @lock.synchronize do
    entry = @store[key]
And similarly for other codepaths
chowells•2mo ago
Does the memory model guarantee that double-check locking will be correct? I don't actually know for ruby.
JamesSwift•2mo ago
I think it wouldnt even be a consideration on this since we arent initializing the store here only accessing the key. And theres already the check-then-set race condition in that scenario so I think it is doubly fine.
hp_hovercraft84•2mo ago
Good call, but I think I would like to ensure it remains thread-safe as @store is a hash. Although I will consider something like this in a future update. Thanks!
wood-porch•2mo ago
Will this correctly retrieve 0 values? AFAIK 0 is falsey in Ruby

``` return nil unless entry ```

chowells•2mo ago
No, Ruby is more strict than that. Only nil and false are falsely.
wood-porch•2mo ago
Doesn't that shift the problem to caching false then :D
RangerScience•2mo ago
you can probably always just do something like:

  def no_items?
    !items.present?
  end
  
  def items
    # something lone
  end

  memoize :items, ttl: 60, max_size: 10`
just makes sure the expensive operation results in a truthy value, then add some sugar for the falsey value, done.
madsohm•2mo ago
Since using `def` to create a method returns a symbol with the method name, you can do something like this too:

  memoize def expensive_calculation(arg)
    @calculation_count += 1
    arg * 2
  end, ttl: 10, max_size: 2

  memoize def nil_returning_method
    @calculation_count += 1
    nil
  end
hp_hovercraft84•2mo ago
This is why I love working with Ruby!
deedubaya•2mo ago
See https://github.com/huntresslabs/ttl_memoizeable for an alternative implementation.

For those who don’t understand why you might want something like this: if you’re doing high enough throughput where eventual consistency is effectively the same as atomic consistency and IO hurts (i.e. redis calls) you may want to cache in memory with something like this.

My implementation above was born out of the need to adjust global state on-the-fly in a system processing hundreds of thousands of requests per second.

kartik_malik•2mo ago
In React ?