Hmm, I'm not sure what I'd use something like this for. Might be better as a phone as a follow up to their phone-size Palma e-reader.

Sorry, but how are you evaluating that? You'd get this because you want a non-emissive display, so what other non-emissive displays are you comparing it against?

Yes, if you want better color acuity, refresh rates, or cost-per-inch, you don't want eInk.

I don't think that is news.

Otherwise you are a motorcycle rider calling cars too expensive.

I've since discovered medication that has eliminated the brunt of Migraine, for me, but this would have been an easy purchase to make, for me.

Mine is a few years old and newer panels are better, so I would expect this to be pretty good.

1) Rapidly changing between apps without pressing the manual refresh button is a little unrealistic usage. Also, the ghosting is way less noticeable in person vs the camera recording here. The contrast looks great in person, similar to the contrast of ink of paper.

2) eInk screen technology is way easier on the eyes for me. I can read on it basically continuously. There's no backlight, it's entirely ambiently lit so usage in direct sunlight is easy. The technology works by physically moving ink particles around and looks like ink on paper. there's also optional front lights for use in darker environments but it's usually off.

The top bar is a CSS issue. I forgot to enable the black and white only mode in the einkbro browser. Since I rarely look at top bar it slipped my mind.

Here's what it looks like with black/white mode:

https://imgur.com/a/ootFuzl