2.1 kids per woman might not be enough for population survival

https://phys.org/news/2025-04-kids-woman-population-survival-reveals.html

7•geox•9mo ago

Comments

eimrine•9mo ago

"Survival" word is not correct, according to the article the correct word is "growing".

yawpitch•9mo ago

On a closer reading the article’s use of “survival” is pretty correct, since it’s looking at what’s required to keep a particular lineage functionally immortal.

quantified•9mo ago

Each lineage is just bragging rights and ego. The species as a whole doesn't care a lot about lineages. A very long time ago, there was a population bottleneck that reduced Homo Sapiens to a few families. [https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abq7487] Those few lineages are thriving.

The species could go on reducing the population for a long time. Who's to say we wouldn't be vastly better off with 500Mm overall humans? The population could shrink down, then expand again. Shrinking now is not a bad thing, it's just a change from what we had been doing.

techpineapple•9mo ago

Something that’s always confused me about this concern is that like —- species adapt to their environment right? So we’re organically probably feeling like the environment can’t sustain more population, and as the population shrinks that will start to reverse. If the population shrinks back to the point there’s wide open spaces and we’re living on homesteads, we’ll probably be having nine kids again.

almosthere•9mo ago

Almost all of the individual decision to have or not have kids is 100% economic. It's too expensive, and internally we rename that to "not ready", "need a house", "want to try a career first".

I do personally think globalists have caused this entire issue. We need to rid the world of them. Kick out the ability for foreign entities to own land/homes in the US.

yawpitch•9mo ago

Right, everyone who can’t draw their ancestry back to before Columbus stumbled on what he thought was India, out!

damnitbuilds•9mo ago

"this figure doesn't account for random differences in how many children people have—as well as mortality rates, sex ratios, and the probability that some adults never have children."

Surely a figure that is an average of 2.1 children per woman DOES account for the probability that some adults never have children ?

RFCs vs. READMEs: The Evolution of Protocols

Kanchipuram Saris and Thinking Machines

Chinese chemical supplier causes global baby formula recall

I've used AI to write 100% of my code for a year as an engineer

Looking for 4 Autistic Co-Founders for AI Startup (Equity-Based)

AI-native capabilities, a new API Catalog, and updated plans and pricing

What changed in tech from 2010 to 2020?

From Human Ergonomics to Agent Ergonomics

Advanced Inertial Reference Sphere

Toyota Developing a Console-Grade, Open-Source Game Engine with Flutter and Dart

Typing for Love or Money: The Hidden Labor Behind Modern Literary Masterpieces

Show HN: A longitudinal health record built from fragmented medical data

CoreWeave's $30B Bet on GPU Market Infrastructure

Creating and Hosting a Static Website on Cloudflare for Free

"The Stanford scam proves America is becoming a nation of grifters"

Elon Musk on Space GPUs, AI, Optimus, and His Manufacturing Method

X (Twitter) is back with a new X API Pay-Per-Use model

Zlob.h 100% POSIX and glibc compatible globbing lib that is faste and better

Show HN: Deterministic signal triangulation using a fixed .72% variance constant

Scientists Discover Levitating Time Crystals You Can Hold, Defy Newton’s 3rd Law

When Michelangelo Met Titian

Solving NYT Pips with DLX

Baldur's Gate to be turned into TV series – without the game's developers

Interview with 'Just use a VPS' bro (OpenClaw version) [video]

EchoJEPA: Latent Predictive Foundation Model for Echocardiography

Disablling Go Telemetry

Effective Nihilism

The UK government didn't want you to see this report on ecosystem collapse

No 10 blocks report on impact of rainforest collapse on food prices

Seedance 2.0 Is Coming