> No, the AI does it all and I'm 10x as effective. Hardly any polish is needed.

> No, the AI writes it all. I'm 3x as effective. It still needs substantial polish.

You're only allowing people to say, "AI does it all and I'm more effective because of it." You don't even admit the possibilities that AI is doing it all but people are only as effective as before or that they're less effective. Your "yes but less than 100%" answers similarly don't offer sufficient variations. Why is 75% the only break-even option (when using AI) and not 50% or 25%? Below 75% you only let people say "AI is writing at least as much code as me, and it's made me more effective".

This poll needs at least two axes: What percentage of your code is written by you (versus AI)? and What effect has it had on your productivity/effectiveness as a developer?

HN polls are ill-suited to this unless you want to make 25+ polling options.