Unless gravity of situation is to much, then (S)urreal[0].(a)nimated.(T)uring[1] (t)ests / (a)nimated (C)omplex-number (T)uring (t)ests might be the way to go. aka Don't have to worry about bricking things[2] because of limited data and need to apply a t-test[3]. May need metaheuristics to analyze.
To much 9.81 might result in visual wrinkles[4] and IRL mov obscuator[5]
---------
[-2]: Huygen's theory of light & wavefronts : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FpTFU4Yh7gQ
[-1]: What is sound? : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhzZAoSYDLE
[0] : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surreal_number#
[1] : physical turing test... : https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43938386
[2] : Brickognize .... : https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/4/1898
[3] : https://www.jmp.com/en/statistics-knowledge-portal/t-test
[4] : Nanoscale wrinkles ... vibrant color patterns : https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43953099
sargstuff•9mo ago
-------
Alternate type of technique for Gauss field convergance of attack, decay, sustain, release (ADSR) in layered Lewis Carrol Quadron space? (simplified to static/frozen version of sonic levitation)