frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

Fortnite' Returns to Apple App Store After Four-Year Battle

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-05-20/epic-games-fortnite-returning-to-apple-app-store-after-spat
1•k2enemy•50s ago•0 comments

An Almost Pointless Exercise in GPU Optimization

https://blog.speechmatics.com/pointless-gpu-optimization-exercise
1•atomlib•3m ago•0 comments

Just 100 corporations responsible for 20% of the extractive conflicts

https://www.uab.cat/web/newsroom/news-detail/just-100-corporations-responsible-for-20-of-the-world-s-extractive-conflicts-1345830290613.html?detid=1345953963539
1•robtherobber•4m ago•0 comments

Pperformance of a large language model on the reasoning tasks of a physician

https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.10849
1•ibobev•7m ago•0 comments

Spain clamps down on Airbnb as tourism backlash returns for summer

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3wdd8lg581o
2•gemanor•10m ago•0 comments

On File Formats

https://solhsa.com/oldernews2025.html#ON-FILE-FORMATS
1•ibobev•13m ago•0 comments

Oxide Computer Company – Thoughts from an Outsider

https://rafaeldtinoco.notion.site/oxide-computer-company-part-1
1•tanelpoder•17m ago•0 comments

Michael Bay's Skibidi Toilet Movie Releases First Details as Production Starts

https://thedirect.com/article/michael-bay-skibidi-toilet-movie-first-details
1•thinkingemote•17m ago•0 comments

Huang's Law

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huang%27s_law
2•andsoitis•20m ago•0 comments

Trump tanks EU business travel to America

https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-eu-business-america-europe-politics-global-tariff/
4•mdp2021•20m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Satoshi Eye – Check crypto wallet risk(hacks, sanctions, darknet)

1•sudhir300582•24m ago•0 comments

Chicago Sun-Times confirms AI used to create reading list of nonexistent books

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/may/20/chicago-sun-times-ai-summer-reading-list
3•phony-account•28m ago•0 comments

Hey Is Finally for Sale on the iPhone

https://world.hey.com/dhh/hey-is-finally-for-sale-on-the-iphone-a08cb218
1•robenkleene•32m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Koan – Extracts Startup Ideas from Real User Pain

https://koanapp.com/
2•robsanna•35m ago•0 comments

Show HN: A simple meal planner that intergrates with Paprika

https://spoonfed.cals.cafe/
1•callumgare•35m ago•0 comments

Idea Aquarium

https://paragraph.com/@rm/ideas-flow-freely
2•rmrmrm•35m ago•1 comments

Twirling your first fork: A beginner's guide to Open Source contribution

https://opensource.net/your-first-fork-open-source/
3•billybuckwheat•37m ago•0 comments

How a Skeptical Philosopher Becomes a Christian

https://larrysanger.org/2025/02/how-a-skeptical-philosopher-becomes-a-christian/
1•thinkingemote•40m ago•0 comments

Spain blocks more than 65,000 Airbnb holiday rental listings

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/spains-consumer-rights-ministry-blocks-more-than-65000-airbnb-listings-holiday-2025-05-19/
2•isaacfrond•42m ago•0 comments

Fortnite returns to the Apple App Store after a 5-year hiatus

https://twitter.com/TimSweeneyEpic/status/1924970858558128424
1•isaacfrond•42m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: How are you using LLMs for research on a library of journal articles?

1•jopizio•43m ago•0 comments

Rust developers offered $20k for rav1d to reach C performance

https://www.developer-tech.com/news/rust-developers-offered-20k-rav1d-to-reach-c-performance/
1•fork-bomber•44m ago•1 comments

A man who invented Twitter ended up broke

https://twitter.com/0xAbhiP/status/1924820022590927331
6•rmason•52m ago•1 comments

A Billion Streams and No Fans': Inside a $10M AI Music Fraud Case

https://www.wired.com/story/ai-bots-streaming-music/
3•Hoasi•52m ago•0 comments

Is this necassary to fail at first time? No money with 280 Users

1•gurpreet_codes•53m ago•1 comments

How we might have viewed the continuum hypothesis as a fundamental axiom

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxu80s5vvzk
1•FillMaths•56m ago•0 comments

A Honduran reef stumps conservationists with its unlikely resilience

https://news.mongabay.com/2025/05/a-honduran-reef-stumps-conservationists-with-its-unlikely-resilience/
2•PaulHoule•1h ago•0 comments

Show HN: JSON Tapose – A Simple, Client-Side JSON Diff Viewer

https://www.jsontapose.com/
2•handsupmin•1h ago•0 comments

We Replaced Nginx with Envoy to Scale Sealos Cloud to 2k Tenants

https://sealos.io/blog/sealos-envoy-vs-nginx-2000-tenants
2•ToAffinity•1h ago•1 comments

Dark LLMs: The Growing Threat of Unaligned AI Models

https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.10066
1•uxhacker•1h ago•1 comments
Open in hackernews

Magnus Carlsen forced into a draw by more than 143000 people playing against him

https://apnews.com/article/chess-magnus-carlsen-match-world-freestyle-grandmaster-963a977765fa02d05a14d701666dfcd7
41•namanyayg•5h ago

Comments

sfblah•4h ago
Presumably "the world" used enough engine help to do this.
somenameforme•3h ago
This is interesting! I assumed the same thing, so I just skimmed through the game with an engine. The world, on average, was definitely not cheating. As early as move 7 Magnus was outright winning!

But there's an interesting meta in that Magnus played far more passively than he normally would. And so I think he also expected he was probably playing an engine by proxy, and wanted to keep the position completely under control. If he knew the world was legit, they probably would have lost!

I'm still trying to reconcile how it came to be that the world didn't cheat though. Lowest common denominator amongst 140k+ people paired with inevitable chatter of 'Hey best engine move is blah' seems unavoidable.

Scarblac•1h ago
Maybe the non cheaters lost interest when he was winning and the cheaters held the draw?
rthnbgrredf•1h ago
I think the assumption that more than 50% of people are cheating in online chess is not correct. Another Grandmaster and ex-world champion Anand recently also did a match against 70k people and won.
somenameforme•1h ago
That's not the assumption at all. The percent of cheaters in online chess is approaching an asymptotic 0 (as a percent of all players) simply because the sites, and chess.com in particular, have gotten very good at culling them.

But things like this are social. I didn't follow this (or even know it was going on somehow) but it seems very safe to assume that somebody and probably multiple somebodies were regularly pointing out and discussing engine moves.

So my only real assumption is that a significant chunk of people would end up deferring to the engine moves rather than their own preference. Of course my implied assumption there is also that a significant chunk of people were involved in the social aspects of this, but I think that's also a fairly reasonable assumption.

squigz•11m ago
Based on a quick skim of the article, I don't think this was, for example, Twitch Chat picking moves, which might enable the social aspect you're referring to - although I'd like to point out the difficulty inherent to being in a room with many thousands of people, all spamming chess moves, and trying to find the one engine move :P
drewbitt•4h ago
95 percent accuracy by the world. They traded most everything and played 99 percent accurate in the second half.
globular-toast•1h ago
I wonder how many people playing legit got bored and signed off leaving it to the people using engines?
EnPissant•4h ago
Magnus Carlsen would get crushed by an engine running on an iPhone 1. Meanwhile the world has access to iPhone 16s. The entire concept is flawed. I'm guessing someone made money off it, though.
esseph•4h ago
The proper question might be: Why is this one iPhone stalemating 140k other iPhones in this particular task?

iPhone/computer/machine/etc

unsupp0rted•3h ago
Better heuristics. Even 1% better heuristics is enough of an edge in a zero-sum game.
analog31•3h ago
I don't know enough about chess, and will take your word for it. What it suggests to me is a deeper question: How do you get 143000 people to all fall in line behind a single machine, or person, making the best decision for them?
EnPissant•3h ago
If you had a military-like organization and turned 143000 people into calculators led by one (talented) person or a hierarchy, then yes, they would crush Magnus.
ars•3h ago
No they would not. If you imagine running a computer chess engine on 143,000 humans, it's not even remotely close to the amount of compute you need to win.

Humans don't win by calculation the way computers do. When you have multiple humans working together on chess they don't add up to an ultra-smart human. You are simply as smart as the smartest human in your crew, and that's it.

EnPissant•2h ago
You could absolutely form a system to harness the power of that many people. It would not happen spontaneously, but it is possible given enough effort. Calculation and memoirzation plays a huge role in chess.
bad_haircut72•3h ago
Cheating obviously does happen but on the whole chess is kept alive by people who do it for fun. What would be the point of beating Magnus with a computer? Would anyone get satisfaction from that?
whythre•3h ago
I mean, with Carlsen facing this sort of aggregate, large number of ‘opponents,’ yeah, I imagine quite a lot of them are cheaters.
olalonde•3h ago
Oh, sweet summer child.
Marsymars•3h ago
> Magnus Carlsen would get crushed by an engine running on an iPhone 1.

Did a quick sanity check here - this seems about right - Carlsen might be at least competitive with Pocket Fritz 4 at similar hardware performance to the iPhone 1, but that discounts the software improvements chess engines have seen over the past couple decades.

hnposter•4h ago
Reminds me of Gary Kasparov vs. The World on MSN Gaming Zone.
tedunangst•4h ago
How many people voted in complete accordance?
nurettin•4h ago
This means the world (or most of it) was not cheating!

What makes it funny is: when 143000 chess players merge, they basically become Anish Giri.

voxl•3h ago
It might be natural to jump to immediately think the majority was cheating, but as you rightly point out if they were cheating Magnus would have lost. Human players cannot compete with even a couple hours compute on stockfish let alone 24 hours.
selcuka•3h ago
It's impressive that Magnus might have won if The World hadn't forced a stalemate.

> In the Chess.com virtual chat this week, players appeared split on whether to force the draw — and claim the glory — or to keep playing against Carlsen, even if it ultimately meant a loss.

gangelov•1h ago
There is the full game with some more details here: https://www.chess.com/news/view/the-world-forces-draw-in-his...
gcbill•1h ago
Perhaps it is worth considering that this was Freestyle chess and not classical chess. Which means the traditional book moves with which chess engines are trained goes out of window. I am not saying Stockfish cant beat Magnus in Freestyle chess but it makes sense to believe that Chess engines are better at classical chess when compared to freestyle.

But then again, with 24 hour time to brute force every possible combination, I guess chess engines may be better at freestyle when compared to classical chess, due to the sheer amount of creativity and calculation involved.