> Rather than relying on backroom deals or dynastic succession, the party's internal promotions and candidate selections are governed by an AI-driven merit evaluation system.
Because an AI cannot be gamed? Or because the company behind it does not have its own agenda? Thanks, but no thanks.
Most governments are already opaque enough in their decisions, adding a black-box AI is not going to anything to improve that. And it'll just hand power to those who are behind the AI. So instead of a government for the people by the people (through representation), you end up with a government run by corporations.
And at the very end:
> Authors: Vysakh, ChatGPT(o3)
JohnFen•8mo ago
Indeed. This proposal sounds to me like fast track to tyranny.
hbartab•8mo ago
Because an AI cannot be gamed? Or because the company behind it does not have its own agenda? Thanks, but no thanks.
Most governments are already opaque enough in their decisions, adding a black-box AI is not going to anything to improve that. And it'll just hand power to those who are behind the AI. So instead of a government for the people by the people (through representation), you end up with a government run by corporations.
And at the very end:
> Authors: Vysakh, ChatGPT(o3)
JohnFen•8mo ago