"If the mRNA-based covid shots produced by Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech represented the cutting edge of vaccine technology, applying ultra-sophisticated approaches never before seen in an inoculation, the approach by Taubenberger and Memoli represents a blast from the past."
mRNA still hasn't fully been tested long-term and is known to cause blood clots and heart-related issues. It most likely killed people as a result of this lack of testing and the government worked with the major social media companies to censor anyone that talked about vaccine-related injuries.
I would rather have research done on decades old technology that works than what we saw during Covid. There were credible people in the scientific community during this time that told people to not listen to their doctors and just take the vaccine. Science is supposed to be about finding the truth and it was just accepted to censor and ban anyone that talked about differing ideas when it came to things like the mRNA vaccines.
The exact opposite of science.
IAmGraydon•1d ago
[flagged]
tomhow•1d ago
When disagreeing, please reply to the argument instead of calling names. "That is idiotic; 1 + 1 is 2, not 3" can be shortened to "1 + 1 is 2, not 3."
billy99k•1d ago
mRNA still hasn't fully been tested long-term and is known to cause blood clots and heart-related issues. It most likely killed people as a result of this lack of testing and the government worked with the major social media companies to censor anyone that talked about vaccine-related injuries.
I would rather have research done on decades old technology that works than what we saw during Covid. There were credible people in the scientific community during this time that told people to not listen to their doctors and just take the vaccine. Science is supposed to be about finding the truth and it was just accepted to censor and ban anyone that talked about differing ideas when it came to things like the mRNA vaccines.
The exact opposite of science.
IAmGraydon•1d ago
tomhow•1d ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Arnt•1d ago
You're basically saying that injecting a small part of a virus is risky, and therefore we should go back to injecting the entire virus.