Two thoughts:

- Most people will want to try something before handing over their personal details. Many startups, once they have your email address, will start spamming with emails, which gets annoying very fast.

- It's not clear what your product does that o3-pro/Claude4/Gemini2.5/DeepSeekR1 can't do. (Or do well.) Your video is mostly just a marketing spiel. If you can't offer an unrestricted, no-questions-asked free trial, what you want to do is show people a sort of A/B test, with your product vs. a well-prompted leading competitor like o3-pro.

Also just imagine hiring McKinsey in 2025. lmao.

Why not ask you genius AI? It surely knows, it is made for that.

Well I can consult you: This thing is shit and will spew out brain dead bullshit. Much like McKinsey, so that part is on point.

How would you like to pay my 250K consulting fee?

- As others have pointed out, if you need to ask us how to GTM, then your product isn't effective, as your entire claim is that it will tell you.

- AIs hallucinate badly when it comes to numbers. The techniques for preventing hallucinations need an valid data set to contrast responses against, which either won't exist or exists because you have hard-coded valid GTM strategies into a data set. So the end result is either prone to hallucinations, or is just regurgitating a canned GTM playbook.

In short, while the idea is interesting, I can't imagine it working well in reality under the current LLM stacks.

By the usage of multiple AI models and a fine tuned architecture (https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7342834...) , some strategic agents leverage the hallucination as a great features (ideation for exemple) while hallucinations are very limited and controlled for other agents (references provided, specific setup, cross checking, usage of other technologies than LLM etc..)