I know my opinions are often unpopular here on HN. It's unfortunate that so many people resort to flagging them based on disagreements.
And again (you didn't make that argument, just for completeness' sake): Military applications aren't affected anyway. They can train on whatever they want as long as the products stay in the military and do not compete with writers and artists etc.
quite how this is worse than what zuckerberg or elon want I really don't know
If a few states adopt more stringent rules, US-based companies will likely have an easier time meeting them than foreign companies. Don't you think Facebook and Google helped shape the CCPA to make compliance easier for them, perhaps to the detriment of foreign competition?
Are yall in the comments agreeing with this actually astroturfing? I can smell the hypocrisy.
[0]: https://www.dlapiper.com/en/insights/publications/2025/06/te...
bgwalter•3h ago
https://www.wsj.com/us-news/law/executives-from-adhd-startup...
https://sfstandard.com/2024/06/13/telemedicine-adderall-vyva...
He seems to have a history of investing in companies that get into trouble:
https://techcrunch.com/2016/09/13/ceo-david-sacks-on-moving-...
It is quite ironic that Republicans have been complaining about the erosion of states' rights forever. I suppose that now a telehealth investor decides the future of "AI" safety and copyright laundering.
kurthr•3h ago
RajT88•3h ago
meager_wikis•3h ago
schmidtleonard•2h ago
The objective function of capitalism is weighted by wealth. "Capitalism is about doing what other people want" is the wealth_gini=0 limit. "Capitalism is about doing what rich people want" is the wealth_gini=1 limit. The USA has a wealth_gini of about 0.85. What do rich people want that poor people don't? Stuff their pockets by extracting value from the poors, of course, which is exactly what we see here. Canceling redistributive programs and taxes is about letting the market do more of what it wants to do: serve the rich, screw the poor.
meager_wikis•2h ago
DangitBobby•2h ago