The first example demonstrating row level security contains results from the wrong tenant.
sebmellen•52m ago
Is that true? I can’t quite follow it on mobile.
journal•1h ago
Doesn't same database multi-tenancy defeats the one-tenant one-database advantage of being able to easily disaster recover a single tenant or allow for easily moving a tenant and all their stuff to a dedicated box?
esseph•58m ago
At a certain scale they'd be sharded and not on a single instance anyway, right?
journal•49m ago
somewhere only in one place there will be main index with at least references to locations where to find others. at the top somewhere there is always just a flat list. this is a multi-dimensional problem. i really want to know real life scenario someone arguing for or against this. really interested to see what side people pick and where they draw the line of what it means to be multi-tenant. personally, i will never again write multi-tenant code ever again in my life. the implementation i've modeled for myself because i understood that immediate backup and restore is more important than fancy multi-tenancy.
jayzalowitz•3h ago