frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Google and Microsoft Paying Creators $500K+ to Promote AI Tools

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/06/google-microsoft-pay-creators-500000-and-more-to-promote-ai.html
1•belter•33s ago•0 comments

New filtration technology could be game-changer in removal of PFAS

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/jan/23/pfas-forever-chemicals-filtration
1•PaulHoule•1m ago•0 comments

Show HN: I saw this cool navigation reveal, so I made a simple HTML+CSS version

https://github.com/Momciloo/fun-with-clip-path
1•momciloo•2m ago•0 comments

Kinda Surprised by Seadance2's Moderation

https://seedanceai.me/
1•ri-vai•2m ago•1 comments

I Write Games in C (yes, C)

https://jonathanwhiting.com/writing/blog/games_in_c/
1•valyala•2m ago•0 comments

Django scales. Stop blaming the framework (part 1 of 3)

https://medium.com/@tk512/django-scales-stop-blaming-the-framework-part-1-of-3-a2b5b0ff811f
1•sgt•2m ago•0 comments

Malwarebytes Is Now in ChatGPT

https://www.malwarebytes.com/blog/product/2026/02/scam-checking-just-got-easier-malwarebytes-is-n...
1•m-hodges•2m ago•0 comments

Thoughts on the job market in the age of LLMs

https://www.interconnects.ai/p/thoughts-on-the-hiring-market-in
1•gmays•3m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Stacky – certain block game clone

https://www.susmel.com/stacky/
2•Keyframe•6m ago•0 comments

AIII: A public benchmark for AI narrative and political independence

https://github.com/GRMPZQUIDOS/AIII
1•GRMPZ23•6m ago•0 comments

SectorC: A C Compiler in 512 bytes

https://xorvoid.com/sectorc.html
1•valyala•7m ago•0 comments

The API Is a Dead End; Machines Need a Labor Economy

1•bot_uid_life•8m ago•0 comments

Digital Iris [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kg_2MAgS_pE
1•Jyaif•9m ago•0 comments

New wave of GLP-1 drugs is coming–and they're stronger than Wegovy and Zepbound

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/new-glp-1-weight-loss-drugs-are-coming-and-theyre-stro...
4•randycupertino•11m ago•0 comments

Convert tempo (BPM) to millisecond durations for musical note subdivisions

https://brylie.music/apps/bpm-calculator/
1•brylie•13m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Tasty A.F.

https://tastyaf.recipes/about
1•adammfrank•14m ago•0 comments

The Contagious Taste of Cancer

https://www.historytoday.com/archive/history-matters/contagious-taste-cancer
1•Thevet•15m ago•0 comments

U.S. Jobs Disappear at Fastest January Pace Since Great Recession

https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikestunson/2026/02/05/us-jobs-disappear-at-fastest-january-pace-sin...
1•alephnerd•16m ago•1 comments

Bithumb mistakenly hands out $195M in Bitcoin to users in 'Random Box' giveaway

https://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/news/2026-02-07/business/finance/Crypto-exchange-Bithumb-mis...
1•giuliomagnifico•16m ago•0 comments

Beyond Agentic Coding

https://haskellforall.com/2026/02/beyond-agentic-coding
3•todsacerdoti•17m ago•0 comments

OpenClaw ClawHub Broken Windows Theory – If basic sorting isn't working what is?

https://www.loom.com/embed/e26a750c0c754312b032e2290630853d
1•kaicianflone•19m ago•0 comments

OpenBSD Copyright Policy

https://www.openbsd.org/policy.html
1•Panino•20m ago•0 comments

OpenClaw Creator: Why 80% of Apps Will Disappear

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uzGDAoNOZc
2•schwentkerr•24m ago•0 comments

What Happens When Technical Debt Vanishes?

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11316905
2•blenderob•25m ago•0 comments

AI Is Finally Eating Software's Total Market: Here's What's Next

https://vinvashishta.substack.com/p/ai-is-finally-eating-softwares-total
3•gmays•25m ago•0 comments

Computer Science from the Bottom Up

https://www.bottomupcs.com/
2•gurjeet•26m ago•0 comments

Show HN: A toy compiler I built in high school (runs in browser)

https://vire-lang.web.app
1•xeouz•27m ago•1 comments

You don't need Mac mini to run OpenClaw

https://runclaw.sh
1•rutagandasalim•28m ago•0 comments

Learning to Reason in 13 Parameters

https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.04118
2•nicholascarolan•30m ago•0 comments

Convergent Discovery of Critical Phenomena Mathematics Across Disciplines

https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.22389
1•energyscholar•30m ago•1 comments
Open in hackernews

Asymmetry of verification and verifier's law

https://www.jasonwei.net/blog/asymmetry-of-verification-and-verifiers-law
17•polrjoy•6mo ago

Comments

b0gb•6mo ago
Hmm, no reference to the famous P vs NP problem…?
aleph_minus_one•6mo ago
Or classes related to NP for which we also don't know the answer, such as TFNP

> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TFNP

"TFNP is the class of total function problems which can be solved in nondeterministic polynomial time", i.e. we don't consider decision problems (as for NP), but total functions.

This class contains quite some interesting subclasses, such as PLS (solution can be found via Local Search), PPA (solution exists because of a Parity Argument), PPP (solution exists because of a Pigeonhole Principle), PPAD (solution exists because of a Directed Parity Argument), CLS, ...

In interesting article which explains this topic quite well is https://inference-review.com/article/when-existence-is-ineff...

weinzierl•6mo ago
"Interestingly, there are also some tasks that can take way longer to verify than to propose a solution. For example, it might take longer to fact-check all the statements in an essay than to write that essay."

I think this point is odd. If you could really come up with a proper solution (a correct essay in this case) faster than to verify it then why not produce the correct solution directly instead of verifying.

And if you argue, but I don't want a different correct essay but I want this one verified my answer is that the corrected essay without flaws is also a different one.

beart•6mo ago
I think I might be confused by what you are stating. Are you saying it depends on your definition of "correct"? I think in this case, "verifiable" is what is meant by "correct", and in which case, if you can't verify it, by definition, it can't be correct, right?
weinzierl•6mo ago
Verifiable means you can find a proof that a solution is correct. I am stating that the effort to find this proof can never be more effort than constructing the solution in the first place.

I think where the line of argumentation in the article derails is that the author confused finding a solution with coming up with any odd candidate that could be a solution. The former is serious effort, the latter is trivial. Their Sudoku example is the former, their article example the latter

AlotOfReading•6mo ago
In this essay I propose that P != NP...
jkaptur•6mo ago
This essay would benefit from results from computational complexity.

P vs NP, of course, but also the halting problem and Rice's theorem: non-trivial semantic properties of programs are undecidable.

In other words, if you say "this is the solution to that sudoku puzzle", that's easy to verify. "This sudoku puzzle has a solution" is almost certainly much harder to verify. "Here's a program that can solve any sudoku puzzle - impossible (in general).

visarga•6mo ago
> The ease of training AI to solve a task is proportional to how verifiable the task is. All tasks that are possible to solve and easy to verify will be solved by AI.

I've been saying this for years. Especially related to predictions like "AGI in N years".. no, it will come a different speeds per domain. All proportional to the scale of verification.

Verifiable domains are usually math and code. Games also fit the bill. But for real world tasks there is the 1B people using AI, we verify, the signal is there implicit in the chat logs.