That should give you a better sense of what sort of reception an intervention should get, or whether anyone besides you perceives this as problematic in the first place.
---
Let's get real, real quick.
- If this is a real employee of a real company, he's being an asshole and deserves the scorn.
- If it's a trick post, designed to play on AI slop nonsense, my answer would make the poster question if his methods really work.
- If it's a joke, then it means I got it and didn't laughed at it. Perhaps I don't have sense or humor, but at least I got it (other answers seem to miss it).
Ultimately, all things human think are imaginary. I am entrenching on the imagination of the poster to question his motives.
ggm•6mo ago
Of course this is high risk. For a working relationship, for your own longevity in the company. But, so is the loss of mutuality. And if the company wants what they are doing, you are so far out of alignment the signal to leave will be strong.
I do think it starts with questioning their behaviour one on one, privately. And listening to their response, and reflecting on it: you may not have all the information: what if they are operating under instruction?
If you do talk, try to keep your temper under control. Avoid giving signals which could be misinterpreted or used against you.
blinkbat•6mo ago
therealpygon•6mo ago
Users don’t know or care if they are getting answers to their questions. If they did, they would complain. No one needs you to be outraged on their behalf.