frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

GPT-5.3-Codex System Card [pdf]

https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/23eca107-a9b1-4d2c-b156-7deb4fbc697c/GPT-5-3-Codex-System-Card-02.pdf
1•tosh•5m ago•0 comments

Atlas: Manage your database schema as code

https://github.com/ariga/atlas
1•quectophoton•7m ago•0 comments

Geist Pixel

https://vercel.com/blog/introducing-geist-pixel
1•helloplanets•10m ago•0 comments

Show HN: MCP to get latest dependency package and tool versions

https://github.com/MShekow/package-version-check-mcp
1•mshekow•18m ago•0 comments

The better you get at something, the harder it becomes to do

https://seekingtrust.substack.com/p/improving-at-writing-made-me-almost
2•FinnLobsien•19m ago•0 comments

Show HN: WP Float – Archive WordPress blogs to free static hosting

https://wpfloat.netlify.app/
1•zizoulegrande•21m ago•0 comments

Show HN: I Hacked My Family's Meal Planning with an App

https://mealjar.app
1•melvinzammit•21m ago•0 comments

Sony BMG copy protection rootkit scandal

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_BMG_copy_protection_rootkit_scandal
1•basilikum•24m ago•0 comments

The Future of Systems

https://novlabs.ai/mission/
2•tekbog•24m ago•1 comments

NASA now allowing astronauts to bring their smartphones on space missions

https://twitter.com/NASAAdmin/status/2019259382962307393
2•gbugniot•29m ago•0 comments

Claude Code Is the Inflection Point

https://newsletter.semianalysis.com/p/claude-code-is-the-inflection-point
3•throwaw12•31m ago•1 comments

Show HN: MicroClaw – Agentic AI Assistant for Telegram, Built in Rust

https://github.com/microclaw/microclaw
1•everettjf•31m ago•2 comments

Show HN: Omni-BLAS – 4x faster matrix multiplication via Monte Carlo sampling

https://github.com/AleatorAI/OMNI-BLAS
1•LowSpecEng•32m ago•1 comments

The AI-Ready Software Developer: Conclusion – Same Game, Different Dice

https://codemanship.wordpress.com/2026/01/05/the-ai-ready-software-developer-conclusion-same-game...
1•lifeisstillgood•34m ago•0 comments

AI Agent Automates Google Stock Analysis from Financial Reports

https://pardusai.org/view/54c6646b9e273bbe103b76256a91a7f30da624062a8a6eeb16febfe403efd078
1•JasonHEIN•37m ago•0 comments

Voxtral Realtime 4B Pure C Implementation

https://github.com/antirez/voxtral.c
2•andreabat•39m ago•1 comments

I Was Trapped in Chinese Mafia Crypto Slavery [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zOcNaWmmn0A
2•mgh2•45m ago•0 comments

U.S. CBP Reported Employee Arrests (FY2020 – FYTD)

https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/reported-employee-arrests
1•ludicrousdispla•47m ago•0 comments

Show HN: I built a free UCP checker – see if AI agents can find your store

https://ucphub.ai/ucp-store-check/
2•vladeta•52m ago•1 comments

Show HN: SVGV – A Real-Time Vector Video Format for Budget Hardware

https://github.com/thealidev/VectorVision-SVGV
1•thealidev•54m ago•0 comments

Study of 150 developers shows AI generated code no harder to maintain long term

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9EbCb5A408
1•lifeisstillgood•54m ago•0 comments

Spotify now requires premium accounts for developer mode API access

https://www.neowin.net/news/spotify-now-requires-premium-accounts-for-developer-mode-api-access/
1•bundie•57m ago•0 comments

When Albert Einstein Moved to Princeton

https://twitter.com/Math_files/status/2020017485815456224
1•keepamovin•58m ago•0 comments

Agents.md as a Dark Signal

https://joshmock.com/post/2026-agents-md-as-a-dark-signal/
2•birdculture•1h ago•0 comments

System time, clocks, and their syncing in macOS

https://eclecticlight.co/2025/05/21/system-time-clocks-and-their-syncing-in-macos/
1•fanf2•1h ago•0 comments

McCLIM and 7GUIs – Part 1: The Counter

https://turtleware.eu/posts/McCLIM-and-7GUIs---Part-1-The-Counter.html
2•ramenbytes•1h ago•0 comments

So whats the next word, then? Almost-no-math intro to transformer models

https://matthias-kainer.de/blog/posts/so-whats-the-next-word-then-/
1•oesimania•1h ago•0 comments

Ed Zitron: The Hater's Guide to Microsoft

https://bsky.app/profile/edzitron.com/post/3me7ibeym2c2n
2•vintagedave•1h ago•1 comments

UK infants ill after drinking contaminated baby formula of Nestle and Danone

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c931rxnwn3lo
1•__natty__•1h ago•0 comments

Show HN: Android-based audio player for seniors – Homer Audio Player

https://homeraudioplayer.app
3•cinusek•1h ago•2 comments
Open in hackernews

Los Alamos is capturing images of explosions at 7 millionths of a second

https://www.lanl.gov/media/publications/1663/dynamics-of-dynamic-imaging
132•LAsteNERD•6mo ago

Comments

LAsteNERD•6mo ago
Fascinating look into the dynamic imaging capabilities at Los Alamos National Lab—essentially, how the U.S. is able to analyze nuclear-level explosive events without actually conducting nuclear tests.

The Lab uses multiple systems to image these high-speed events:

• pRad uses proton radiography to get 20–40 frames of a detonation, with material-level resolution based on density.

• DARHT uses dual-axis x-ray imaging to create 3D snapshots from two angles, ideal for testing whether the computational models built from pRad hold up.

• Scorpius (in development) will take this a step further by using subcritical plutonium in a new accelerator at NNSS, capturing multiple high-resolution frames just nanoseconds apart.

The fact that they can tailor experiments based on frame-by-frame behavior of individual materials under explosive stress feels like the real-world version of “bullet time” physics modeling. The margins of error come down to billionths of a second.

josh2600•6mo ago
Thank you for contextualizing this. We are truly living in a wild part of the space time continuum.
sci-designer•6mo ago
Wow, this is wild. billionths of a second?!
scrlk•6mo ago
I'm reminded of Grace Hopper's famous nanoseconds lecture: https://youtu.be/gYqF6-h9Cvg?t=78
LosAlamosNerd•6mo ago
Oh, I haven't watched that before.
HPsquared•6mo ago
1 ns * c = 1 ft, to put in perspective: 7 μs * c is 1.3 miles.

(Protip: just type "7 μs * c in miles" into Google)

chasd00•6mo ago
7 μs is also the time it takes light to travel about 1,400 Ariana Grandes.
rkomorn•6mo ago
In which direction? Presumably side to side?
jjk166•6mo ago
Due to relativity the length of Ariana Grande will appear to change such that all observers agree on the same speed of light.
rkomorn•6mo ago
But... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Side_to_Side
BearOso•6mo ago
Not quite. The article says hundreds of nanoseconds, which would be in the 10 millionths range. Or if you take the title literally, 143ns per image. That's in line with the fastest CCDs, so not unimaginable.
mapt•6mo ago
"Millionths", abbreviated "mths of a second" here for... reasons...

Known to the entire world, including American STEM people, as a microsecond.

bombela•6mo ago
Anything to avoid using the proper units, you wouldn't want the Americans audience to be enlightened wouldn't you.
stavros•6mo ago
What irks me is that they could have abbreviated "7mths of a second" to just "7us" while ADDING clarity!
jjk166•6mo ago
7ms is 7 milliseconds. Unfortunately 7μs is difficult to type and there isn't a good universal way to abbreviate it in ascii.
stavros•6mo ago
Eh, 7us is fine.
dez11de•6mo ago
Pics or it didn’t happen.
dylan604•6mo ago
You could watch it, but you'd die of natural causes before it finished
LAsteNERD•6mo ago
depending on the experiment, could be unnatural causes.
LAsteNERD•6mo ago
https://www.lanl.gov/media/publications/1663/prad-future-sto...
paradox460•6mo ago
For more on this, look at the DAHRT project. It occurred up the hill a bit from LANSCE, in DX instead, but did similar things
tandr•6mo ago
Pardon for the old meme here, but... "Pics, or did not happened!"?
cosmicgadget•6mo ago
Yeah I kind of expected explosionpron not camera rig diagrams.
meager_wikis•6mo ago
Every time I read about one of the national labs doing this research, I wonder how much longer we will head about these. I feel fairly positive that DOGE's layoffs and budget cuts mean this output will fade away in time.
LAsteNERD•6mo ago
I worry about this, but these capabilities are hard to replace. This kind of research hasn’t historically been something you can outsource to private companies. Or—at least—it hasn’t been until now. Even if this administration wants to open that door, the infrastructure investment required for the accelerators alone is staggering: easily in the multiple billions.
sfilmeyer•6mo ago
Maybe I'm misreading your comment, but you seem like you're talking about privatizing this research whereas the other commenter seems to be talking about public cuts leading to a reduction of research. Just because something gets cut doesn't mean it gets outsourced elsewhere.
LAsteNERD•6mo ago
I guess my point is that it's hard to simply cut research that's essential for certifying that the stockpile is safe and works. I'll avoid making any predictions, because who the hell knows what's going to happen, but I think dynamic imaging work may prove a tough target for DOGE.
toast0•6mo ago
Why not just rubber stamp the certification and save all that money?
ted_dunning•6mo ago
Yes. It is hard to this honestly and correctly. That would mean that normal people wouldn't make these cuts.

It also has very little predictive power for the loon with the checkbook right now. He might just as likely notice that people care a lot about that issue and hold it for ransom.

jejdjdndn•6mo ago
I think the overall aim of DOGE is simply to move research into privately controlled entities, especially those that can’t be cut. Its simply a continuation of transferring the national asset base (tax/usd) from democratic control, into private control.

It doesn’t need to be profit making in the normal sense (see SpaceX) it just needs to be the only game in town when the US Gov spends on national security

mythrwy•6mo ago
I don't think defense budget is facing cuts. They are getting even more money.
dralley•6mo ago
The national labs are absolutely getting budget cuts.
LAsteNERD•6mo ago
For sure. But depending on what Congress does, think defense budgets could grow, which would mean more money for defense-positioned Labs like Los Alamos.
AlotOfReading•6mo ago
Nuclear research is done under the Department of Energy, not DoD. Los Alamos is a DoE lab, and the DoE received major cuts in the recent budget bill, though that shifts energy efficiency research into weapons research and net increases lab funding.
bobmarleybiceps•6mo ago
I have heard that their internal review processes for papers have started telling people to not say stuff like "XYZ may be useful for climate research" or "this is an alternative energy source that's environmentally friendly." Like they are literally discouraged from talking about climate stuff at all lol.
AlotOfReading•6mo ago
Wouldn't surprise me. Getting rid of the other research programs won't be great for the labs though. The weapons research has a bunch of weird incentives because of the geopolitical context it exists in. The goal usually isn't to operationalize research, it's to have credible evidence of a functioning nuclear program, maintain the arsenal, and act as a jobs program for nuclear physics. The other programs act as a way to operationalize things in socially acceptable ways. If you get rid of them, I suspect the labs aren't going to be better-off for it even with more funding.
_n_b_•6mo ago
Los Alamos is an NNSA lab; NNSA is a semi-autonomous component of DOE and its weapons activities budget is distinct from the general DOE budget. NNSA’s nonproliferation budget has been cut but they’re still very well funded on the weapons side even if they’ve lost quite a lot of people in the last few months.

The national labs are organized under the Office of Science (17 labs), NNSA (LANL, LLNL, Sandia), the Office of Nuclear Energy (INL), the Office of Environmental Management (Savannah River), Office of Fossil Energy (NETL), and Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (NREL). Some offices are doing better than others re: funding in the current environment!

dttze•6mo ago
That’s going to the MIC grift though.
kjkjadksj•6mo ago
It’s for bombs, it’s untouchable.
elygre•6mo ago
It might end up financing a gold-plated airplane for a library.
defrost•6mo ago
For context for casual readers:

  Which may explain why no one wants to discuss a mysterious, $934 million transfer of funds from one of the Pentagon’s most over-budget, out-of-control projects — the modernization of America’s aging, ground-based nuclear missiles.
What Will It Cost to Renovate the ‘Free’ Air Force One? Don’t Ask.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/27/us/politics/air-force-one...

mhh__•6mo ago
Labs like this also have huge black budget spending that we don't get to see.

I'm guessing we'll see more hidden spending in future as the nukes and the engineers that made them get older. its worth asking if they even work (in some countries arsenals at least)

bombela•6mo ago
7mths? What unit is that. Did they mean 7μs resolution? How is that special? I see youtubers doing nanoseconds.

edit: here is the important information in this article.

> Scorpius is a new accelerator project planned for the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) that will use an electron beam that can be broken into customized pulses to deliver x-rays and capture multiple images only hundreds of nanoseconds apart.

So 0.1μs or 100ns temporal resolution 3D X-ray.

tngranados•6mo ago
The first line of the articles says "seven-millionths of a second", which would be 1/7μs or 0,14μs. They also mention that the camera shot 16 frames in that period, so that would be once every 0,00875μs or once every 8,75ns

Youtubers are a couple of magnitudes away from that, AFAIK

SECProto•6mo ago
I would say you described "one seven millionth" of a second (1/7,000,000 s)

"Seven millionths" would be 7/1,000,000 s (7μs). They take 20 to 40 images in that period using 7 cameras, so any given camera might be as low as 1.4μs per frame.

alberth•6mo ago
Saying ~140k photos per second would have been a more understanding stat if only the article framed it that way.
thfuran•6mo ago
Yes, but they said seven-millionths of a second, not seven millionths of a second. Technically they're right that that's what it means, but I'd expect an editor to recommend against that phrasing in favor of the one you used to avoid confusion.
thaumasiotes•6mo ago
Well, it's true that the article says "seven-millionths".

I would guess it's a lot more likely that this is an editing failure, introducing a hyphen where no hyphen should be, than that they meant to divide a second into seven million equal parts.

For one thing, as SECProto alludes to, English would normally require you to say "less than a seven-millionth of a second" if that was what you meant. There's no such thing as saying "less than weeks". You have to specify less than how many weeks.

    less than (seven) (millionths of a second)
ordinary grammar, ordinary unit choice

    less than (seven millionths of a second)
improper grammar, bizarre unit choice.
thfuran•6mo ago
I agree based on the whole sentence in the article that that was probably an editing error.
montag•6mo ago
I understood the article just fine, despite the spurious hyphen. The HN title could be improved immensely if it just said 7 microseconds.
rhdunn•6mo ago
The slow mo guys did a video [1] at 10 trillion FPS. They also recently did another video [2] at 5,000,000 FPS. Their other videos vary between 50,000 FPS and 850,000 FPS.

Edit: They mention in [2] that the Phantom camera they have can go to a 95ns exposure up to 1,750,000 FPS.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ys_yKGNFRQ&pp=ygUMc2xvdyBtb...

[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BTkZ36g4GOs

ninkendo•6mo ago
The 10 trillion FPS number comes from the fact that they’re taking advantage of a strobing effect in the light they’re filming, such that if the strobe is happening at (for example) 1000Hz, they can get a frame at time T, then a frame at time T + 1.00000000001ms, then T + 2.00000000002ms, and so on. Then you stitch it together and it looks like they’re a 10-trillionth of a second apart.

No camera is taking in 10 trillion frames of data per second.

kazinator•6mo ago
"electron beam that can be broken down into customized pulses" also sounds superficially like strobing.
ted_dunning•6mo ago
Not with X-rays they aren't.
dbeardsl•6mo ago
I think this is incorrect reading of the numbers

I've never heard of `{number} {plural magnitude}` meaning `mag / number`. I've only ever seen it mean `number * mag`. As in 3-thousandths == 3 * 0.001 not 0.001 / 3.

7 * 0.001ms = 0.007ms or 7us or 7000ns.

1970-01-01•6mo ago
7 months/seconds - Its both a dimensionless quantity and a variable. Very impressive. Los Alamos is taking the USA's 'anything but metric units for measuring' to new levels.
isatty•6mo ago
I read it as months. Super confusing.
abainbridge•6mo ago
While we're nit-picking the title, what does the "real-time" part mean? How would it be different if it wasn't real-time?

Dictionary.com defines "real-time" like as, "the actual time during which a process or event occurs", eg "along with much of the country, he watched events unfolding in real time on TV". Or in the domain of Computing, "relating to a system in which input data is processed within milliseconds so that it is available virtually immediately as feedback to the process from which it is coming, e.g. a missile guidance system might have "real-time signal processing".

Neither definition work here. It seems like they took a sequence of pictures very quickly, and then, some time later, played them back at an enormously slowed-down rate.

gjhan•6mo ago
The opposite of "real-time" in this context would be "sampling". It means that the capture represents the high-resolution time history of one particular event (one explosion) instead of fast and successively offset captures from as many events.
throwaway290•6mo ago
Error 404.
cco•6mo ago
Why are science communicators so consistently missing the mark?

Is it not obvious that if you're writing an article proclaiming to capture _explosions_ at 7mths of a second, people want to see some pictures of said explosions?

Clearly they're understanding that explosions are a hook to grab the reader's attention, but then they just don't include any of the resulting pictures?

C'mon y'all! We need to do better here!

LAsteNERD•6mo ago
https://www.lanl.gov/media/publications/1663/prad-future-sto...
junon•6mo ago
404 for me in Germany.
qingcharles•6mo ago
https://www.lanl.gov/media/publications/1663/prad-future-sto...
LosAlamosNerd•6mo ago
http://bit.ly/45hDNnK
ooterness•6mo ago
Page not found :(
qingcharles•6mo ago
https://www.lanl.gov/media/publications/1663/prad-future-sto...
nxobject•6mo ago
I imagine this falls under the remit of "nuclear warhead research without actual warheads".
rtkwe•6mo ago
> When it’s ready, experiments at Scorpius will be similar to DARHT but with the added complexity of using subcritical amounts of plutonium instead of surrogate materials.

They basically explicitly say that without just coming out and saying it. This kind of hyper fast explosion analysis and photography is a big part of making implosion bombs work properly.

edit: actually they just say it, they don't have to be coy everyone knows the US and other countries study this and it doesn't violate the NTBT because it's sub critical.

> essential to the Lab’s stockpile stewardship mission because it helps scientists test and understand the fundamental characteristics of materials and explosive events to inform computational models and analyses without ever detonating an actual weapon.

getpost•6mo ago
It's an apples-to-oranges comparison, but I'm reminded of the ~10^12 fps (1.7 ps exposures) demonstrated in work at MIT[0], which was for a completely different application.

[0] https://web.media.mit.edu/~raskar/trillionfps/

EDIT: Video with explanation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtsXgODHMWk

avodonosov•6mo ago
Are the images available?
amelius•6mo ago
Do the images match the simulations?
zenmac•6mo ago
Can we see some these pictures?
noobermin•6mo ago
Soon to be defunded too I suppose.
LAsteNERD•5mo ago
Discussion continues, with more on dynamic imaging and the labs, here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44876919