But on the lower levels, where the insight is much much narrower and your ability to protest or influence the outcome is near zero... That I am worried about.
Municipals, councils, social services, make decisions that directly effect peoples lives. E.g. building permits, custody cases, restaurant permits and so so much more low level things.
And I somewhat understand, if you have a stack of cases to go through and ChatGPT can shorten it from 6 hours to 30 seconds, then why not? Never mind the details, if the outcomes at a glance seems match the average then lets go.
This has to be satire
I am very interested in new technology and how people use it, I've brought it up a lot in my own circles and encountered several occasions where some "stop thinking" and takes the output from ChatGPT as "done-and-dusted".
And remember that people at municipal offices are just normal humans like you and me. Most just want to get things over with so they can go home, and AI is a convenient tool to help with that.
Frieren•6mo ago
But that is the goal of tech companies by giving the service at a loss. To make people depend on it until big tech corporations have control of your own thoughts.
A prime minister should know better.
SilentTiger•6mo ago