Internet Access Providers Aren't Bound by DMCA Unmasking Subpoenas–In Re Cox

https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2025/08/internet-access-providers-arent-bound-by-dmca-unmasking-subpoenas-in-re-cox.htm

145•hn_acker•5mo ago

Comments

djoldman•5mo ago

But what is the recourse if IAPs in the 9th district ignore the decision and continue to divulge subscriber information?

I assume subscribers must sue the IAP.

idiotsecant•5mo ago

I don't think there is any law in the US that ISPs can't give away or sell your data if they want to.

sumtechguy•5mo ago

Would have to read thru Tittle II of the communications act and see what portions they are under. Title I is POTs and Title II is ISPs and Cellphone providers. Title I tends to be much more strict.

TrueDuality•5mo ago

Remember that under the last reign of the current present, information services were removed from Title II regulation. Biden did vote to restore the net neutrality status last year but that was challenged in court and never went into effect. It was ultimately overturned in January and we're left without net neutrality protections.

bobmcnamara•5mo ago

Several states have privacy laws limiting or requiring disclosure of how their data is used.

If I understand correctly the FTC only prevents companies from selling your data when they've told you they won't.

brians•5mo ago

Electronic communications privacy act, to start.

brookst•5mo ago

How does that apply? In this case the companies sending subpoenas are saying "who was using IP address w.x.y.z at 10:15am on June 15?". How would ECPA apply, since IIRC, it covers requirements for law enforcement to collect data from telecoms?

MrDarcy•5mo ago

Contact your state attorney general is also an option.

otterley•5mo ago

And demand what, exactly? And under what law?

MrDarcy•5mo ago

AG oversees utilities and are granted regulatory powers because they are effectively monopolies.

Explain clearly and reasonably your claim and you will likely see action and response.

otterley•5mo ago

AGs can only enforce laws and regulations that are on the books. Being a monopoly doesn’t give AGs some sort of arbitrary control over them. So which law or regulation would they enforce, exactly? It might help if you cited a specific code that says they cannot divulge subscriber information.

voxic11•5mo ago

Usually they would go after them for deceptive business practices due to violating their own privacy policy.

otterley•5mo ago

If they violated their own policy, sure. But not every disclosure of customer information is prohibited by policy. The policy should be clear as to what the holder may do and what they won't.

brookst•5mo ago

I think the ruling is that they are not required to, but it does not say they are forbidden to.

Assuming their TOS says they reserve the right to share such information in response to subpoenas / their whims, I'm not sure there would be much recourse unless there's some law forbidding this.

busterarm•5mo ago

This is why the IAP I worked at 15 years ago took every unmasking subpoena and routed them to the trash. I was so proud of that.

immibis•5mo ago

You can't just ignore a subpoena if you value not being in jail. You have to argue that you don't have to answer it.

busterarm•5mo ago

None of them were ever followed up with. So while you're correct in theory, in practice the consequences of it were nonexistent.

Likely because the firm knows that the subpoena that they're sending you is bullshit in the first place. They don't actually want the legal challenge.

margana•5mo ago

Sounds similar to ignoring clearly fraudulent DMCAs. Technically you are not allowed to ignore one no matter how clearly fraudulent it is, but in practice no one would follow up on those.

dragonwriter•5mo ago

> Sounds similar to ignoring clearly fraudulent DMCAs. Technically you are not allowed to ignore one no matter how clearly fraudulent it is

Not true.

Technically, you are allowed to ignore ANY DMCA takedown. However, if you don't ignore it, and if you otherwise would have been guilty of copyright infringement for hosting the user-provided content at issue, then following the DMCA takedown request will immunize you (that's why it is called a "safe harbor" provision), so, if you aren't 100% certain that it's not wrong, you have a strong motive to respect it.

If the DMCA takedown request was actually fraudulent, then either there was no potentially violating material or the requester wasn't the copyright holder or their agent, so you had no liability to them to immunize against. So you absolute can ignore it as much as you want.

getcrunk•5mo ago

Well thank god corporations can’t be jailed /s

Notes for February 2-7

Study confirms experience beats youthful enthusiasm

The Big Hunger by Walter J Miller, Jr. (1952)

The Genus Amanita

We have broken SHA-1 in practice

Ask HN: Was my first management job bad, or is this what management is like?

Ask HN: How to Reduce Time Spent Crimping?

KV Cache Transform Coding for Compact Storage in LLM Inference

A quantitative, multimodal wearable bioelectronic device for stress assessment

Why Big Tech Is Throwing Cash into India in Quest for AI Supremacy

How to shoot yourself in the foot – 2026 edition

Eight More Months of Agents

From Human Thought to Machine Coordination

The new X API pricing must be a joke

Show HN: RMA Dashboard fast SAST results for monorepos (SARIF and triage)

Show HN: Source code graphRAG for Java/Kotlin development based on jQAssistant

Python Only Has One Real Competitor

Tmux to Zellij (and Back)

Ask HN: How are you using specialized agents to accelerate your work?

Passing user_id through 6 services? OTel Baggage fixes this

DavMail Pop/IMAP/SMTP/Caldav/Carddav/LDAP Exchange Gateway

Visual data modelling in the browser (open source)

Show HN: Tharos – CLI to find and autofix security bugs using local LLMs

Oddly Simple GUI Programs

The New Playbook for Leaders [pdf]

Interactive Unboxing of J Dilla's Donuts

OneCourt helps blind and low-vision fans to track Super Bowl live

Rudolf Vrba

Autism Incidence in Girls and Boys May Be Nearly Equal, Study Suggests

Wellness Hotels Discovery Application

Notes for February 2-7

Study confirms experience beats youthful enthusiasm

The Big Hunger by Walter J Miller, Jr. (1952)

The Genus Amanita

We have broken SHA-1 in practice

Ask HN: Was my first management job bad, or is this what management is like?

Ask HN: How to Reduce Time Spent Crimping?

KV Cache Transform Coding for Compact Storage in LLM Inference

A quantitative, multimodal wearable bioelectronic device for stress assessment

Why Big Tech Is Throwing Cash into India in Quest for AI Supremacy

How to shoot yourself in the foot – 2026 edition

Eight More Months of Agents

From Human Thought to Machine Coordination

The new X API pricing must be a joke

Show HN: RMA Dashboard fast SAST results for monorepos (SARIF and triage)

Show HN: Source code graphRAG for Java/Kotlin development based on jQAssistant

Python Only Has One Real Competitor

Tmux to Zellij (and Back)

Ask HN: How are you using specialized agents to accelerate your work?

Passing user_id through 6 services? OTel Baggage fixes this

DavMail Pop/IMAP/SMTP/Caldav/Carddav/LDAP Exchange Gateway

Visual data modelling in the browser (open source)

Show HN: Tharos – CLI to find and autofix security bugs using local LLMs

Oddly Simple GUI Programs

The New Playbook for Leaders [pdf]

Interactive Unboxing of J Dilla's Donuts

OneCourt helps blind and low-vision fans to track Super Bowl live

Rudolf Vrba

Autism Incidence in Girls and Boys May Be Nearly Equal, Study Suggests

Wellness Hotels Discovery Application

Internet Access Providers Aren't Bound by DMCA Unmasking Subpoenas–In Re Cox

Comments