Internet Access Providers Aren't Bound by DMCA Unmasking Subpoenas–In Re Cox

https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2025/08/internet-access-providers-arent-bound-by-dmca-unmasking-subpoenas-in-re-cox.htm

145•hn_acker•5mo ago

Comments

djoldman•5mo ago

But what is the recourse if IAPs in the 9th district ignore the decision and continue to divulge subscriber information?

I assume subscribers must sue the IAP.

idiotsecant•5mo ago

I don't think there is any law in the US that ISPs can't give away or sell your data if they want to.

sumtechguy•5mo ago

Would have to read thru Tittle II of the communications act and see what portions they are under. Title I is POTs and Title II is ISPs and Cellphone providers. Title I tends to be much more strict.

TrueDuality•5mo ago

Remember that under the last reign of the current present, information services were removed from Title II regulation. Biden did vote to restore the net neutrality status last year but that was challenged in court and never went into effect. It was ultimately overturned in January and we're left without net neutrality protections.

bobmcnamara•5mo ago

Several states have privacy laws limiting or requiring disclosure of how their data is used.

If I understand correctly the FTC only prevents companies from selling your data when they've told you they won't.

brians•5mo ago

Electronic communications privacy act, to start.

brookst•5mo ago

How does that apply? In this case the companies sending subpoenas are saying "who was using IP address w.x.y.z at 10:15am on June 15?". How would ECPA apply, since IIRC, it covers requirements for law enforcement to collect data from telecoms?

MrDarcy•5mo ago

Contact your state attorney general is also an option.

otterley•5mo ago

And demand what, exactly? And under what law?

MrDarcy•5mo ago

AG oversees utilities and are granted regulatory powers because they are effectively monopolies.

Explain clearly and reasonably your claim and you will likely see action and response.

otterley•5mo ago

AGs can only enforce laws and regulations that are on the books. Being a monopoly doesn’t give AGs some sort of arbitrary control over them. So which law or regulation would they enforce, exactly? It might help if you cited a specific code that says they cannot divulge subscriber information.

voxic11•5mo ago

Usually they would go after them for deceptive business practices due to violating their own privacy policy.

otterley•5mo ago

If they violated their own policy, sure. But not every disclosure of customer information is prohibited by policy. The policy should be clear as to what the holder may do and what they won't.

brookst•5mo ago

I think the ruling is that they are not required to, but it does not say they are forbidden to.

Assuming their TOS says they reserve the right to share such information in response to subpoenas / their whims, I'm not sure there would be much recourse unless there's some law forbidding this.

busterarm•5mo ago

This is why the IAP I worked at 15 years ago took every unmasking subpoena and routed them to the trash. I was so proud of that.

immibis•5mo ago

You can't just ignore a subpoena if you value not being in jail. You have to argue that you don't have to answer it.

busterarm•5mo ago

None of them were ever followed up with. So while you're correct in theory, in practice the consequences of it were nonexistent.

Likely because the firm knows that the subpoena that they're sending you is bullshit in the first place. They don't actually want the legal challenge.

margana•5mo ago

Sounds similar to ignoring clearly fraudulent DMCAs. Technically you are not allowed to ignore one no matter how clearly fraudulent it is, but in practice no one would follow up on those.

dragonwriter•5mo ago

> Sounds similar to ignoring clearly fraudulent DMCAs. Technically you are not allowed to ignore one no matter how clearly fraudulent it is

Not true.

Technically, you are allowed to ignore ANY DMCA takedown. However, if you don't ignore it, and if you otherwise would have been guilty of copyright infringement for hosting the user-provided content at issue, then following the DMCA takedown request will immunize you (that's why it is called a "safe harbor" provision), so, if you aren't 100% certain that it's not wrong, you have a strong motive to respect it.

If the DMCA takedown request was actually fraudulent, then either there was no potentially violating material or the requester wasn't the copyright holder or their agent, so you had no liability to them to immunize against. So you absolute can ignore it as much as you want.

getcrunk•5mo ago

Well thank god corporations can’t be jailed /s

I Was Trapped in Chinese Mafia Crypto Slavery [video]

U.S. CBP Reported Employee Arrests (FY2020 – FYTD)

Show HN: I built a free UCP checker – see if AI agents can find your store

Show HN: SVGV – A Real-Time Vector Video Format for Budget Hardware

Study of 150 developers shows AI generated code no harder to maintain long term

Spotify now requires premium accounts for developer mode API access

When Albert Einstein Moved to Princeton

Agents.md as a Dark Signal

System time, clocks, and their syncing in macOS

McCLIM and 7GUIs – Part 1: The Counter

So whats the next word, then? Almost-no-math intro to transformer models

Ed Zitron: The Hater's Guide to Microsoft

UK infants ill after drinking contaminated baby formula of Nestle and Danone

Show HN: Android-based audio player for seniors – Homer Audio Player

Starter Template for Ory Kratos

LLMs are powerful, but enterprises are deterministic by nature

Make your iPad 3 a touchscreen for your computer

Internationalization and Localization in the Age of Agents

Building a Custom Clawdbot Workflow to Automate Website Creation

Why the "Taiwan Dome" won't survive a Chinese attack

Xkcd: Game AIs

Windows 11 is finally killing off legacy printer drivers in 2026

From Offloading to Engagement (Study on Generative AI)

AI for People

Rome is studded with cannon balls (2022)

8-piece tablebase development on Lichess (op1 partial)

US to bankroll far-right think tanks in Europe against digital laws

Ask HN: Have AI companies replaced their own SaaS usage with agents?

pi-nes

Show HN: Crew – Multi-agent orchestration tool for AI-assisted development

I Was Trapped in Chinese Mafia Crypto Slavery [video]

U.S. CBP Reported Employee Arrests (FY2020 – FYTD)

Show HN: I built a free UCP checker – see if AI agents can find your store

Show HN: SVGV – A Real-Time Vector Video Format for Budget Hardware

Study of 150 developers shows AI generated code no harder to maintain long term

Spotify now requires premium accounts for developer mode API access

When Albert Einstein Moved to Princeton

Agents.md as a Dark Signal

System time, clocks, and their syncing in macOS

McCLIM and 7GUIs – Part 1: The Counter

So whats the next word, then? Almost-no-math intro to transformer models

Ed Zitron: The Hater's Guide to Microsoft

UK infants ill after drinking contaminated baby formula of Nestle and Danone

Show HN: Android-based audio player for seniors – Homer Audio Player

Starter Template for Ory Kratos

LLMs are powerful, but enterprises are deterministic by nature

Make your iPad 3 a touchscreen for your computer

Internationalization and Localization in the Age of Agents

Building a Custom Clawdbot Workflow to Automate Website Creation

Why the "Taiwan Dome" won't survive a Chinese attack

Xkcd: Game AIs

Windows 11 is finally killing off legacy printer drivers in 2026

From Offloading to Engagement (Study on Generative AI)

AI for People

Rome is studded with cannon balls (2022)

8-piece tablebase development on Lichess (op1 partial)

US to bankroll far-right think tanks in Europe against digital laws

Ask HN: Have AI companies replaced their own SaaS usage with agents?

pi-nes

Show HN: Crew – Multi-agent orchestration tool for AI-assisted development

Internet Access Providers Aren't Bound by DMCA Unmasking Subpoenas–In Re Cox

Comments