frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Quantization-Aware Distillation for NVFP4 Inference Accuracy Recovery [pdf]

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVFP4-QAD-Report.pdf
1•gmays•35s ago•0 comments

xAI Merger Poses Bigger Threat to OpenAI, Anthropic

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2026-02-03/musk-s-xai-merger-poses-bigger-threat-to-op...
1•andsoitis•43s ago•0 comments

Atlas Airborne (Boston Dynamics and RAI Institute) [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNorxwlZlFk
1•lysace•1m ago•0 comments

Zen Tools

http://postmake.io/zen-list
1•Malfunction92•4m ago•0 comments

Is the Detachment in the Room? – Agents, Cruelty, and Empathy

https://hailey.at/posts/3mear2n7v3k2r
1•carnevalem•4m ago•0 comments

The purpose of Continuous Integration is to fail

https://blog.nix-ci.com/post/2026-02-05_the-purpose-of-ci-is-to-fail
1•zdw•6m ago•0 comments

Apfelstrudel: Live coding music environment with AI agent chat

https://github.com/rcarmo/apfelstrudel
1•rcarmo•7m ago•0 comments

What Is Stoicism?

https://stoacentral.com/guides/what-is-stoicism
3•0xmattf•8m ago•0 comments

What happens when a neighborhood is built around a farm

https://grist.org/cities/what-happens-when-a-neighborhood-is-built-around-a-farm/
1•Brajeshwar•8m ago•0 comments

Every major galaxy is speeding away from the Milky Way, except one

https://www.livescience.com/space/cosmology/every-major-galaxy-is-speeding-away-from-the-milky-wa...
2•Brajeshwar•8m ago•0 comments

Extreme Inequality Presages the Revolt Against It

https://www.noemamag.com/extreme-inequality-presages-the-revolt-against-it/
2•Brajeshwar•8m ago•0 comments

There's no such thing as "tech" (Ten years later)

1•dtjb•9m ago•0 comments

What Really Killed Flash Player: A Six-Year Campaign of Deliberate Platform Work

https://medium.com/@aglaforge/what-really-killed-flash-player-a-six-year-campaign-of-deliberate-p...
1•jbegley•9m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: Anyone orchestrating multiple AI coding agents in parallel?

1•buildingwdavid•11m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Knowledge-Bank

https://github.com/gabrywu-public/knowledge-bank
1•gabrywu•16m ago•0 comments

Show HN: The Codeverse Hub Linux

https://github.com/TheCodeVerseHub/CodeVerseLinuxDistro
3•sinisterMage•17m ago•2 comments

Take a trip to Japan's Dododo Land, the most irritating place on Earth

https://soranews24.com/2026/02/07/take-a-trip-to-japans-dododo-land-the-most-irritating-place-on-...
2•zdw•17m ago•0 comments

British drivers over 70 to face eye tests every three years

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c205nxy0p31o
20•bookofjoe•18m ago•7 comments

BookTalk: A Reading Companion That Captures Your Voice

https://github.com/bramses/BookTalk
1•_bramses•19m ago•0 comments

Is AI "good" yet? – tracking HN's sentiment on AI coding

https://www.is-ai-good-yet.com/#home
3•ilyaizen•20m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Amdb – Tree-sitter based memory for AI agents (Rust)

https://github.com/BETAER-08/amdb
1•try_betaer•20m ago•0 comments

OpenClaw Partners with VirusTotal for Skill Security

https://openclaw.ai/blog/virustotal-partnership
2•anhxuan•20m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Seedance 2.0 Release

https://seedancy2.com/
2•funnycoding•21m ago•0 comments

Leisure Suit Larry's Al Lowe on model trains, funny deaths and Disney

https://spillhistorie.no/2026/02/06/interview-with-sierra-veteran-al-lowe/
1•thelok•21m ago•0 comments

Towards Self-Driving Codebases

https://cursor.com/blog/self-driving-codebases
1•edwinarbus•21m ago•0 comments

VCF West: Whirlwind Software Restoration – Guy Fedorkow [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLoXodz1N9A
1•stmw•22m ago•1 comments

Show HN: COGext – A minimalist, open-source system monitor for Chrome (<550KB)

https://github.com/tchoa91/cog-ext
1•tchoa91•23m ago•1 comments

FOSDEM 26 – My Hallway Track Takeaways

https://sluongng.substack.com/p/fosdem-26-my-hallway-track-takeaways
1•birdculture•24m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Env-shelf – Open-source desktop app to manage .env files

https://env-shelf.vercel.app/
1•ivanglpz•27m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Almostnode – Run Node.js, Next.js, and Express in the Browser

https://almostnode.dev/
1•PetrBrzyBrzek•27m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

F1 in Hungary: Strategy and fast tire changes make all the difference

https://arstechnica.com/cars/2025/08/f1-in-hungary-strategy-and-fast-tire-changes-make-all-the-difference/
44•PaulHoule•5mo ago

Comments

nkurz•5mo ago
> Leclerc was able to keep in front of Piastri at his second stop as well, and both drivers were stationary for just two seconds as their crews swarmed over the cars. But that single stop of Norris' was even faster at 1.9 seconds, and while he was driving slower than his teammate, he held track position at the front and was driving flawlessly.

Wow, I know nothing about F1 racing, but that is a fast tire change. Here's how it works: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FE5FGSEQc8Q. Three people on each tire, one single bolt. Full stop over the jack, unbolt, old tire off, new tire on, rebolt, drop and go.

PaulHoule•5mo ago
It's insane how fast they do it.
WalterBright•5mo ago
It's fun to compare it with clips of tire changes in past F1 races. There's been a constant evolution in the tire change procedure/dance.
rzzzt•5mo ago
At one point (oof, one article says 2010) re-fueling went out the window, that's a big time sink.
technothrasher•5mo ago
And it changes things completely for the tire changers. When there's re-fueling, there isn't really any stress on the tire changers. Without it, it's most often all on them.
nullify88•5mo ago
Less fires too!
jodleif•5mo ago
This is really old now (I think 2000s) but even the jacks they lift the car with doesn’t drop with gravity alone - that’s too slow. They have some mechanism that actively drops the jack, so they can pull it away faster.
basisword•5mo ago
The record is 1.8s. This was after changes were introduced to try to slow down pit stops. I believe in the past signals were sent that the wheels were on before they were fully secured (anticipating that by the time the signal was given to the driver the wheel would be fully secured). A delay was introduced and over a couple of seasons the crews managed to get back to (and beat) their old times.
woliveirajr•5mo ago
And there's a lot of redundancy, just waiting to execute the task if anyone or some equipment fails.
amelius•5mo ago
On the other hand ... why isn't this fully automated yet?
metaltyphoon•5mo ago
Because it wouldn’t be a sport
dmbche•5mo ago
I'm not sure it would be as fast or have anywhere near the same redundancy for the price.

Just locating the wheel in space is non trivial!

squigz•5mo ago
Software engineers, ladies and gentleman :P

You could then ask this of all aspects of the sport, and all other sports as well!

Pit stops are a crucial aspect of motorsports; they can make or break a race. So competition in that area is good.

rzzzt•5mo ago
Why not make a race entirely of pit stops?
squigz•5mo ago
F1 has gotten boring lately. That ought to spice it up!
dralley•5mo ago
Or a race with no pit stops. Tire degradation is largely artificial and designed to FIA requirements. They could make tires that lasted an entire race with minimal reduction in grip if they wanted to, but that would remove a lot of strategy.
bluesroo•5mo ago
This exists; they are called sprint races. Sprint races are generally a stepping stone to the bigger leagues because it doesn't require the same type of manpower and coordination to be competitive. A lot of spec series (like the MX-5 series that runs with IMSA sometimes) tend to be this way to lower the barrier of entry.
squigz•5mo ago
The MX-5 Cup series is better than F1 anyway :D
scrlk•5mo ago
Yeah, I don't see the point of having drivers either.

Given that F1 cars just need to drive around a circuit in good weather conditions, teams could just install a comma 3X self driving system and replace an expensive driver for $1k.

rzzzt•5mo ago
Perhaps two well-placed grooves in the track could aid with steering with side rails providing DC power?
mrexroad•5mo ago
Life sized self-driving slot car race—could be interesting as its own thing.
rascul•5mo ago
> Given that F1 cars just need to drive around a circuit in good weather conditions

That wasn't the case until recently.

scrlk•5mo ago
It's a real shame that F1 has become so conservative about wet races. I'd love to see something like the Massa/Kubica battle at Fuji in 2007 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnxUu36-uYw) happen today.
rascul•5mo ago
F1 racing used to be so much better.
BoredPositron•5mo ago
There is an AI powered autonomous racing series...

https://youtu.be/feTxamTHQAA?si=SVlFGU1b8ZaLZsw_

amelius•5mo ago
Simulate the entire thing. Output a number saying which car won.
mvdtnz•5mo ago
Because spectators don't want to watch that.
clickety_clack•5mo ago
They specify tires that don’t last a full race and have to be changed because the pit stop as it is is such a core aspect of race strategy.
PaulRobinson•5mo ago
F1 is a wonderful sport if you're a geek.

The drivers are of course the athletes - they have to spend a couple of hours driving cars at up to 200mph through lateral and longitudinal forces that can exceed 5G, or race in conditions where they can lose 4kgs (9lbs) of weight in sweat - but the edges, the performance gains, it's all in the engines and aero departments back at the factory, the crews getting setups right, the pit stops down into the sub-2s, and so much more.

If you were to ask a casual fan who has won the most World Championships they might suggest in recent history that is Max Verstappen (he's won four). A more serious fan will tell you that Lewis Hamilton (still driving today) is tying with Michael Schumacher (who isn't), with 7 drivers' championships, which is the all-time record.

But a more serious fan might suggest it's Adrian Newey - an engineer who has designed cars that have won 12 constructors' championships and 14 drivers' championships. He is now working at Aston Martin on their 2026 car, when all the regulations are changing and Cadillac is joining as an 11th team.

There is ample geekery on YouTube about various design aspects (Phase changing materials to change airflow over inner brake drums? Rear wings that flex "illegally"? Technical regulation deep dives? It's all there), and there is a sofa-friendly series to get partners interested in "Drive to Survive" on Netflix where you'll get to know all the human personalities, and even a - frankly absurd, but popcorn-worthy fun - Hollywood film starring Brad Pitt.

On race weekends there are teams of hundreds of people back at factories analysing not just their own teams' data, but what data is available from other teams: just over 1m data points a second through 3 practice sessions, a qualifying session, potentially a sprint qualifier and sprint race, and then the race itself.

There are team members who specialise in strategy, some who do nothing but figure out the likelihood of rain and understanding where the prevailing wind is coming from (aerodynamics are critical), and squads of people who think long and hard about tires - the three compounds they can choose from (and they must race a minimum of two per race), pressures, and degradation - and even a few people making sure that the car (which is fuelled to not quite finish the race for weight reasons), is correctly being coasted when needed if a safety car doesn't turn up.

Then there's the simulator setups. There are sims back in the factories with dedicated sim drivers testing setups with engineers, but you can join in at home to a point. The gaming sims are now getting good enough that with a decent wedge or with a visit to one of the F1 arcades, you can get something that, g-forces aside, will give something that's about 80% accurate in terms of track layout and some car setups, which is enough for the lay person to realise how insanely hard it is to get the car setup right and consistently send it around the tracks at those speeds and tolerances.

It's a deep well. It's my favourite sport to watch, and I recommend it to all.

themafia•5mo ago
> The drivers are of course the athletes

In the modern sport they're a weird hybrid between athlete and pilot. The cars are exceptionally complex and in addition to the forces you mention there's incredibly complicated input devices embedded into the steering wheel and it's not uncommon to have 15 to 20 different, specific, timed control changes during the course of a lap.

A comparison, and I'm not sure everyone will appreciate this, but to my elderly eyes, a major difference is in how drivers look when they get out of a car at the end of a race. Modern drivers spring out of their cars with plenty of spare energy to parade around the paddock. In previous eras drivers would come out of their cars drenched in sweat, often in visible pain, and had to be assisted to get back into the garage.

It reflects a fundamental shift in the role and use of technology in the cockpit. I love both sports; however, I do see them as almost two entirely different sports.

rkomorn•5mo ago
I'm not sure I'm reading your comment correctly, or getting your point. How does technology affect how they look when they come out?
speeder•5mo ago
Technology made driving f1 cars less brutal on the body. To start of in the first seasons a lot of stuff was unknown, for example some drivers wanted oxygen bottle so they wouldn't pass out while carefully leaving a fire. Others preferred instead to have the car to be the most easy as possible to leave, if a fire happened.

Now there is also head support, while drivers back then had to just use their muscles to hold their head in place.

The list goes on... but it still is an athletic sport. When Nico Rosberg decided to win the championship, he had to heavily change his routine to so way more fitness training than he was used to. After he won the championship and immediately retired, he hinted that one of the reasons for retirement is that he didn't want to continue with the heavy body training.

nemo44x•5mo ago
I guess compare the fatality rate to the classic years that made the sport. Guys were literally risking their lives every race and drivers died regularly. It’s no doubt the cars were harder to manage and stressful to push to the limits.
wslh•5mo ago
> even a - frankly absurd, but popcorn-worthy fun - Hollywood film starring Brad Pitt.

The last race in Netherlands, last Sunday, was the closest to the movie in this season though.

swasheck•5mo ago
rain and safety cars!
PaulRobinson•5mo ago
I think the British GP was the most like the film, and it was the first GP after a lot of people would have seen the film and thought "Oh, I'll check that out". If that was their first race weekend... yeah, it's not always like that.

Netherlands was good, but I actually can't think of a "bad" race this season, though. The racing is more competitive and there's a lot more going on to think about strategy and race-craft wise. It's been ramping for a couple of seasons, and I think it's really welcome: I'm glad we're not in the era of dominance that we had during the Max wins by 20+ seconds, or Lewis before him, or the Schumacher years when he was lapping half the field and the only interesting thing to watch for was other podium places. It's just so much more fun when you can't be certain who is crossing the line first in 1.5-2 hours time.

technothrasher•5mo ago
> and even a - frankly absurd, but popcorn-worthy fun - Hollywood film starring Brad Pitt.

Yeah, "F1 the movie" was ridiculous; some of the lines had me laughing out loud at how corny they were. But it was certainly popcorn-worthy, and it had enough Easter eggs for actual F1 fans to keep them entertained. It was hilarious to watch one of the podium scenes where Leclerc had this look of, "am I doing this acting thing right, guys?" that was precious.

But if you want an actual good F1 movie, "Rush" is very well done. It tells the story of the rivalry between drivers Niki Lauda and James Hunt during the 1970s.

jmyeet•5mo ago
So I picked up watching F1 during the pandemic. I like it but you have to know a bit to really appreciate it so let me give you some basics.

First, it's what's called a constructor series. That is, there are different engine manufacturers and each team builds their own car. Soem components can be shared (ie bought from manufacturers), some can't. The cars are intentionally not identical. Some are just better. There are constraints but teams have a lot lf latitude.

This is as opposed to a spec series 9eg Formula E) where the cars are basically identical. This is a spectrum.

There are 10 teams (11 next year; there have been more in the past). Each team fields 2 cars with 2 drivers. The first 10 places award points (up to 25) to both the driver and the team. The team (constructor) standings at the end of the year award prize money. There is a title for the best team and the best driver.

The fact that there are 2 drivers and they both want to win the drivers championship. This creates a ton of tension and conflict.

Because there are only 20(ish) drivers in a season, the individual personalities matter. The complete polar opposite of this is probably the NFL, which has I believe ~1700 full time players in any given year, probably not even including practice squads.

There is now a constructor (and engine) cost cap. That's relatively new (since 2022). Before that some teams would spend 2-3x+ what other teams did, kinda like MLB.

So because there are unequal cars, there are periods of dominance. Currently the clear #1 car is fielded by McLaren. Previously that was Red Bull. Then for a long time it was Mercedes. Sometimes (notably in 2021) there was a close fight between 2 teams for both championships.

The current engine regulations are for a hybrid engine with ground effect cars. Next year it's even more hybrid but they're getting rid of ground effect.

There are currently 24 races in a season going from March to early December with some breaks in between. Race weekends generally run from Friday to Sunday. The format is to have 3 free practice ("FP") sessions on 2 days, each lasting an hour, where teams can change their setup, run different tires and have different run plans to fine tune their setup.

The second session on the Saturday is qualifying (often just "quali") in 3 sessions. In each session each driver is trying to do the fastest single lap possible. In the first 2 sessions the bottom 5 drivers are eliminated. They have a tire allowance for all this that I won't go into. But the starting order for the race (on Sunday) is set from fastest to slowest times. These sessions are called q1, q2 and q3.

The actual race typically runs ~300km (Monaco is less). With different lap lengths that's a different number of laps. In the current regulations the cars are fully-fueled at the start. Previously there was in-race refuelling but no more, for safety reasons.

Tires will last a varying number of laps and there are 3 compounds to use, called soft, medium and hard. There's more complexity to this but I'll ignore that. You have to use at last 2 differnt compounds in the race. That's what the pit stops are, to change tires and possibly a broken front wing (and, as I said, previously refuelling).

The starting order and finishing order are usually called p1 to p20. The top 3 places are also called podium places because, well, you get a trophy. On a podium.

There's more to it like sprint races and how wet weather changes things as well as safety procedures like safety cars, red flags and yellow flags.

But when you go beyond this, you get into the lore, which is both fascinating and hilarious, like industrial espionage on teams that was exposed by a Kinko's employee or someone intentionally getting a driver to crash to affect the world championship or the two childhood friends who ended up teammates and ended up not speaking to each other after a bitter championship fight.

romperstomper•5mo ago
I have started with F1 around pandemic too :) I took me some time to figure out what DRS is and why and how it is used. Regarding the cars and dominance - if I'm not wrong Red Bull previously contracted with Honda and they gave them superb engines. Now their contract is over and Honda is working with McLaren. So looks like who uses Honda is the winner, at least in recent years.
epolanski•5mo ago
Would love to know how such high performing teams operate and execute.
dralley•5mo ago
James Vowles and Toto Wolff are both really interesting to listen to. Especially James - you can immediately tell that his brain is operating on a very high level of organization and clarity.
alistairSH•5mo ago
Good interviews with those two leaders. “High Performance” has other interviews with drivers, trainers, etc. But I’d agree that Wolff and Vowles are two of the best in the industry and also at talking about it/interviewing.

Toto Wolff: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=z5Yxk6s971E

Wolff with Daks Shepherd (bit less geeky, probably watch this first): https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=D-LrZc193uU

James Vowles: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nYzwvTSffiY&pp=0gcJCRsBo7VqN5t...

alistairSH•5mo ago
If you want a less technical, entertaining view into F1, Netflix’s “Drive to Survive” is excellent (if a little over-dramatic).

It’s documented-drama, but has enough of the geeky stuff to be interesting.

epolanski•5mo ago
I am a huge F1 fan actually, (but I have refused to watch the latest 2 DTS seasons), but that gives very little idea on how those organizations works and operate day to day.
alistairSH•5mo ago
Yeah, that's true, I did mention "less technical". But for anybody curious about F1, it's as good a way to start as any. Easy enough to take comments from the show and search online or check YouTube for more details.
dralley•5mo ago
The latest 2 DTS seasons are much better than the earlier ones in terms of accuracy. Not perfect, but better.
piva00•5mo ago
I don't think DTS shows any teams' operations stuff at all, it's focused on personalities and exaggerated drama between them.

You don't see almost any factory footage, logistics, R&D, etc., when there's factory footage it's about meeting rooms, signings of drivers, at most a trophy room.

For technical/operations I think the best is finding videos on YouTube, Driver61 has been doing a series on some aspects of it after getting access from Alpine, I'm sure there are other channels that go in-depth as well on this side of the sport.

jjav•5mo ago
While I've followed F1 as a sport since the late 80s, in the last decade I've been more fascinated by the aspect of running these teams.

What it must take to run an engineering orgzanization of many hundreds of people where every single thing has to be basically perfect in design, build and execution. Because the other top teams are certainly aiming for that as well so anyone who doesn't is getting lapped.

While the pressure must be intense, I do envy that idea when looking from this side, the world of software engineering, where sloppy practices are the norm and there are rarely any consequences to inefficiency.

I would enjoy working in an environment where any single bug gives you a DNF and the code that runs fastest by a hundredth of a second wins and every other competitor is a loser. That would be very intellectually rewarding.

basisword•5mo ago
You might like this video[1]. The driver crashed on his way to the grid. The team had a very limited amount of time to fix the car, on the grid. The video includes radio communication between the various parts of the team and they organise equipment, analyse the issue, and make sure they comply with the various rules. Really fascinating to see how something like this is managed so calmly.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGwm1QmwN9s

anodari•5mo ago
The Hungarian circuit is very difficult for overtaking. Therefore, the front-runner has a much better chance of winning, making tire changes a critical issue.
tempusalaria•5mo ago
Fast tire changes only matter a very limited amount of the time (pretty much only if the extra time drops you a place, so there has to be 1 car/20 in a specific 1 second window on what is typically a 90s lap for 3s (a slow stop) vs 2s (a fast stop) to matter. Maybe 20% of the time a slow stop happens, it costs a driver.

Strategy matters a lot and good strategy is worth at least a few positions in a race.

basisword•5mo ago
You're forgetting the offset from undercutting. The cars don't need to be within 1s on track for it to matter - you could be within 4s and that extra 0.5s in the pit stop costs you the position if you pit later. Un-lapped 'traffic' is also critical. If you're trying to find a gap to pit into and it's tight an extra second could put you behind a slow car and cost you 'real' positions later.
WalterBright•5mo ago
I've been watching Netflix's "Drive to Survive." One of the most frustrating aspects of it is the team will talk about strategy, but will never say what their strategy is. They'll say the car needs improvement, then say the car is improved, but never say what they did to improve it. They'll say they need to negotiate to get driver X, but never give any hint over what the negotiations were.

Watch it for a while, and you'll see. You never get any real information.

delta_p_delta_x•5mo ago
Anyone who's watched even one series of actual F1 content would quickly understand that the narrative woven in DTS ranges from exaggerated to almost fictional and dramatised for the sake of the cameras.

DTS is only really useful in generating memes like Guenther Steiner's 'foksmash' and the Aldi catalogue, Guenther Steiner and Mattia Binotto in the Dolomites, Guenther Steiner and 'hygiene'—no, sorry, it's 'Hi, Gene'. You get the idea.

There are so many more actually useful resources like most of the pre- and post-race media pens and press conferences, Ted's Notebook on Sky F1, F1TV's technical deep dives, the r/f1technical subreddit, and even each team's own marketing material and press releases. Team strategy and car development is generally not openly discussed anywhere, because they're critical to the teams' performance during the races. There are people who have pieced together information though, and you'll never see this sort of investigative analysis on DTS.

dralley•5mo ago
Drive to Survive isn't that type of show. It's about the characters and drama, not the racing.
squigz•5mo ago
Drive To Survive is a drama series. It's not really meant for technical information.
basisword•5mo ago
That's because DTS is for people who don't watch the sport. To get them interested. If you've watched the sport for any significant length of time DTS is basically hell on earth to watch. They even go as far as showing footage in the wrong order (turn 1, turn 12, turn 4) to fit their narrative.

There are great technical writers that do pretty in depth analysis (including drawings) of all upgrades teams bring to their cars. I don't know the names off hand but I've seen these as far back as the early 00's. Strategy is covered pretty well on the live broadcast too by ex-strategy engineers.

WalterBright•5mo ago
I remember when they asked Senna what his F1 strategy was. He replied "start in the pole position, and stay in front!"
rascul•5mo ago
Good strategy for any type of racing.