frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Waymo Approved to Operate at San Jose Mineta International Airport

https://sfstandard.com/2025/09/04/waymo-approved-operate-san-jos-mineta-international-airport/
1•sdhillon•12s ago•0 comments

Ask HN: Do you know any myopia researchers?

1•mieubrisse•49s ago•0 comments

The irony of stablecoin: centralization is the point

https://text-incubation.com/The+great+irony+of+stablecoin?tempo
1•krrishd•1m ago•1 comments

North Korean hackers are using fake job offers to steal cryptocurrency

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/how-north-korean-hackers-are-using-fake-job-offers-ste...
2•giuliomagnifico•1m ago•0 comments

Nvidia GPU Virtualization (VGPU) Support

https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20250903221111.3866249-1-zhiw@nvidia.com/
1•esaym•2m ago•0 comments

New constraints on the age of the Universe and the Hubble constant

https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.02692
1•bikenaga•2m ago•0 comments

AI Predictions for Agents

https://kumo.ai/company/news/kumorfm-mcp/
1•gk1•3m ago•0 comments

Finding 1,000 exposed AI servers took researchers 10 minutes

https://tailscale.com/blog/AI-endpoints-on-public-web
2•CharlesW•3m ago•0 comments

Prosecutors Fail to Obtain Indictment Against Man Who Threw Sandwich at Agent

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/27/us/politics/trump-sandwich-assault-indictment-justice-departme...
2•duxup•4m ago•0 comments

LLM Social Simulations Are a Promising Research Method

https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.02234
1•PaulHoule•5m ago•0 comments

OB-1: the new #1 coding agent on Terminal Bench

https://twitter.com/openblocklabs/status/1963651471536542129
1•tejpalv8•7m ago•0 comments

Private Assets Need Public Buyers

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/newsletters/2025-09-04/private-assets-need-public-buyers
1•toomuchtodo•8m ago•0 comments

Forbes: The Cloud 100 2025

https://www.forbes.com/lists/cloud100/
1•samaysharma•9m ago•0 comments

New Shelly Wall Display XL

https://www.shelly.com/products/shelly-wall-display-xl-gray
1•gniting•10m ago•0 comments

AI is causing a drop in hiring but few layoffs

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2025/09/04/ai-less-hiring-few-layoffs/85966555007/
3•geox•11m ago•1 comments

VX-NOVA.Ω1: A Symbolic AI Engine That Patches Code Without Any Models

https://github.com/XzenithAI/VX-NOVA.-1
1•XzenithAI•12m ago•0 comments

Saquon Is Playing for Equity

https://www.readtheprofile.com/p/saquon-barkley-investment-portfolio
3•polinapompliano•15m ago•0 comments

Netlify: New credit-based pricing for today's AI development

https://www.netlify.com/blog/new-pricing-credits/
2•brycewray•15m ago•0 comments

Analog optical computer for AI inference and combinatorial optimization

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09430-z
1•officerk•16m ago•0 comments

Feature Engineering A-Z

https://github.com/EmilHvitfeldt/feature-engineering-az
1•reqo•16m ago•0 comments

I built my own phone [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qy_9w_c2ub0
1•indigodaddy•16m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Bistroai.cc generate Michelin-quality meals with AI

https://www.bistroai.cc
1•araldhafeeri•16m ago•0 comments

US puts $10M bounty on 3 Russians accused of attacking critical infrastructure

https://www.theregister.com/2025/09/04/us_10m_bounty_fsb_attackers/
3•rntn•17m ago•0 comments

Guide to America

https://www.guidetoamerica.info
2•bhagyash•19m ago•0 comments

Birds of a Feather (Remake in Strudel) [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PjSOSoZeSA
1•olooney•23m ago•0 comments

Facet: Reflection for Rust

https://fasterthanli.me/articles/introducing-facet-reflection-for-rust
3•whatever3•24m ago•0 comments

How developers are using generative AI to create a new generation of games [pdf]

https://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/global_ai_meets_the_games_industry.pdf
1•mooreds•24m ago•0 comments

The Bonfire of the GPUs

https://stohl.substack.com/p/the-bonfire-of-the-gpus
1•FreeQueso•24m ago•0 comments

Zacks Investment Quantum Stocks Eyeing Breakoust: D-Wave, IonQ, and Rigetti

https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/zacks-investment-ideas-feature-highlights-d-wave-quantum-ionq-and...
1•DocFeind•26m ago•0 comments

Show HN: ZipZen – Lightweight Release Hosting for Binaries

1•gabor-boros•26m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Wikipedia survives while the rest of the internet breaks

https://www.theverge.com/cs/features/717322/wikipedia-attacks-neutrality-history-jimmy-wales
45•leotravis10•1h ago

Comments

krunck•1h ago
https://archive.is/rXgsz
djoldman•51m ago
> Wikipedia is the largest compendium of human knowledge ever assembled, with more than 7 million articles in its English version, the largest and most developed of 343 language projects.

but:

> The collections of the Library of Congress include more than 32 million catalogued books and other print materials in 470 languages; more than 61 million manuscripts; the largest rare book collection in North America ...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Congress#Holdings

jalapenod•48m ago
Much of Wikipedia is pop culture, I wouldn’t call that knowledge.
UtopiaPunk•37m ago
[citation needed]
LtWorf•33m ago
Honestly it's the first place I look when I must implement some network protocol.
mschuster91•27m ago
yup. the amount of times I have looked up how to send an email over raw SMTP for troubleshooting...
mdp2021•9m ago
...And on the contrary, I got deliria from an LLM in a similar area just hours ago.

This probably highlights how human contribution or automated referencing both have a root in the sources, that should be recovered as a focus. Part of the future of the presentation of information should be hyperlinking "to the book pages".

freedomben•27m ago
Network protocol stuff on Wikipedia has been top notch and my go-to since at least 2010. It really is highly underrated for that. I had to implement a layer 7 protocol on top of UDP back in the day, and it required a lot of understanding/fiddling with UDP and IP packet details to get it working right, and even required some router config (IP fragmentation became a huge problem, gotta love protocols designed by committee D-:)
bilekas•11m ago
Leaving out that your comment is opinionated and objectively wrong, pop culture is also knowledge.
rimunroe•10m ago
> Much of Wikipedia is pop culture, I wouldn’t call that knowledge.

Why?

Jordan-117•37m ago
To me, "compendium" means a single organized reference, not a collection of many different individual works. More encyclopedia than library.
glimshe•45m ago
The "largest compendium of human knowledge ever assembled" isn't Wikipedia. It's Anna's Archive.

Especially relevant when reading this from a paywalled article.

bawolff•32m ago
There has been this trend recently of calling Wikipedia the last good thing on the internet.

And i agree its great, i spend an inordinate amount of my time on Wikimedia related things.

But i think there is a danger here with all these articles putting Wikipedia too much on a pedestal. It isn't perfect. It isn't perfectly neutral or perfectly reliable. It has flaws.

The true best part of Wikipedia is that its a work in progress and people are working to make it a little better everyday. We shouldn't lose sight of the fact we aren't there yet. We'll never be "there". But hopefully we'll continue to be a little bit closer every day. And that is what makes Wikipedia great.

potato3732842•20m ago
When you put something on a pedestal it almost always eventually gets co-opted by people who's goals are not noble enough to build a pedestal themselves and who are seeking a ready made pedestal from which to spew their garbage.

Of all the demographics who should understand this, you'd think that people complaining about the failure of all the other institutions would be high on the list.

mdp2021•14m ago
It's a miracle that the model of voluntary contribution from random agents and imperfect overview partially worked.

The science that could emerge by studying the phenomenon could constitute a milestone.

hungmung•26m ago
Honestly Wikipedia+Archive.org remaining online have national security implications (not just USA, but any democracy). Though I'd wager the current administration would take a different view.
Aurornis•1m ago
In the past few years I've noticed more and more issues on Wikipedia. It has never been perfect, but in the past it seemed like anything without sufficient sources would quickly get flagged as "citation needed" or questionable statements would get a warning label slapped on them.

Now, I can visit pages for certain medical conditions that contain completely unsourced claims with no "citation needed" nor any warnings. When I try to search for it, I often trace it back to alternative medicine or pseudoscience influencers.

The sad part is that when I've tried to remove obviously flimsy information, someone will immediately come along and add it back. Unless you're ready to spend months in a Wikipedia edit war with someone who obsesses over a page, there's no point in even trying. These people know the rules and processes and will use every one of them against you. When that fails, they'll try to pull rank. If that fails, they'll just quietly continue editing and rewriting (possibly from alt accounts) until you get too tired to fight the battle any more.