They could have simply notified the company and the people about a potential problem with their visas/paperwork and asked them to provide documentation otherwise or if their visas were expired/improper to return to Korea and apply for a new visa.
Has even this been established? It sounds like the question is whether their work falls outside of the business allowed under that program, and the terminology doesn’t appear to be well-defined enough to say.
legitster•1h ago
“This was not a immigration operation where agents went into the premises, rounded up folks, and put them on buses. This has been a multi-month criminal investigation where we have developed evidence and conducted interviews, gathered documents and presented that evidence to the court in order to obtain a judicial search warrant.”
I like that when justifying the raid, the agent in charge of the raid tacitly admitted they do regularly just burst onto a premise and round up people for buses.
It's worth pointing out that the people behind this raid are not recently appointed hacks - and that this was not at the direct mandate of the current administration. What is actually happening here is the entire agency is staffed with attack dogs who act without impunity or shame. And the only difference is that they feel emboldened to act, and whoever was in charge of oversight to hold them back is no longer there.
mixmastamyk•1h ago
potato3732842•1h ago
That's how these sort of BigCo regulatory compliance things almost always go.
schlauerfox•1h ago
bryanlarsen•1h ago
sickofparadox•1h ago
bryanlarsen•48m ago
JumpCrisscross•1h ago
The point is everyone may have broken the law. Hyundai. These individuals. And the ICE agents acting outside the colour of law.
etblg•16m ago
mathgradthrow•1h ago
potato3732842•1h ago
BigCo is angry the .gov thugs showed up unannounced and dragged their dicks all over everything like they're the goddamn DEA seizing the entire contents of an autobody shop because one of the techs was involved in drug running shit.
The .gov thugs respond "we didn't abuse you like some little fish, we akshually built a case" as if that justfies it.
Everyone should be enraged by both sides here because both sides statements are clearly predicated on the assumption that what they do is perfectly ok.
BigCo shouldn't be getting away with "it looks good if you squint and my lawyer will tell you why" sketchy compliance stuff that the little guy can't. And the .gov should be treating the little guy with the same respect that they would a BigCo who can pay a big law firm to get their stuff in order.
glitchc•1h ago