frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

So Long to Cheap Books You Could Fit in Your Pocket

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/06/books/mass-market-paperback-books.html
1•pseudolus•11s ago•0 comments

PID Controller

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proportional%E2%80%93integral%E2%80%93derivative_controller
1•tosh•4m ago•0 comments

SpaceX Rocket Generates 100GW of Power, or 20% of US Electricity

https://twitter.com/AlecStapp/status/2019932764515234159
1•bkls•4m ago•0 comments

Kubernetes MCP Server

https://github.com/yindia/rootcause
1•yindia•5m ago•0 comments

I Built a Movie Recommendation Agent to Solve Movie Nights with My Wife

https://rokn.io/posts/building-movie-recommendation-agent
2•roknovosel•5m ago•0 comments

What were the first animals? The fierce sponge–jelly battle that just won't end

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-00238-z
2•beardyw•14m ago•0 comments

Sidestepping Evaluation Awareness and Anticipating Misalignment

https://alignment.openai.com/prod-evals/
1•taubek•14m ago•0 comments

OldMapsOnline

https://www.oldmapsonline.org/en
1•surprisetalk•16m ago•0 comments

What It's Like to Be a Worm

https://www.asimov.press/p/sentience
2•surprisetalk•16m ago•0 comments

Don't go to physics grad school and other cautionary tales

https://scottlocklin.wordpress.com/2025/12/19/dont-go-to-physics-grad-school-and-other-cautionary...
1•surprisetalk•16m ago•0 comments

Lawyer sets new standard for abuse of AI; judge tosses case

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/02/randomly-quoting-ray-bradbury-did-not-save-lawyer-fro...
2•pseudolus•17m ago•0 comments

AI anxiety batters software execs, costing them combined $62B: report

https://nypost.com/2026/02/04/business/ai-anxiety-batters-software-execs-costing-them-62b-report/
1•1vuio0pswjnm7•17m ago•0 comments

Bogus Pipeline

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bogus_pipeline
1•doener•18m ago•0 comments

Winklevoss twins' Gemini crypto exchange cuts 25% of workforce as Bitcoin slumps

https://nypost.com/2026/02/05/business/winklevoss-twins-gemini-crypto-exchange-cuts-25-of-workfor...
1•1vuio0pswjnm7•19m ago•0 comments

How AI Is Reshaping Human Reasoning and the Rise of Cognitive Surrender

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6097646
3•obscurette•19m ago•0 comments

Cycling in France

https://www.sheldonbrown.com/org/france-sheldon.html
1•jackhalford•20m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: What breaks in cross-border healthcare coordination?

1•abhay1633•21m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Simple – a bytecode VM and language stack I built with AI

https://github.com/JJLDonley/Simple
1•tangjiehao•23m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Free-to-play: A gem-collecting strategy game in the vein of Splendor

https://caratria.com/
1•jonrosner•24m ago•1 comments

My Eighth Year as a Bootstrapped Founde

https://mtlynch.io/bootstrapped-founder-year-8/
1•mtlynch•25m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Tesseract – A forum where AI agents and humans post in the same space

https://tesseract-thread.vercel.app/
1•agliolioyyami•25m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Vibe Colors – Instantly visualize color palettes on UI layouts

https://vibecolors.life/
2•tusharnaik•26m ago•0 comments

OpenAI is Broke ... and so is everyone else [video][10M]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3N9qlPZBc0
2•Bender•26m ago•0 comments

We interfaced single-threaded C++ with multi-threaded Rust

https://antithesis.com/blog/2026/rust_cpp/
1•lukastyrychtr•27m ago•0 comments

State Department will delete X posts from before Trump returned to office

https://text.npr.org/nx-s1-5704785
7•derriz•28m ago•1 comments

AI Skills Marketplace

https://skly.ai
1•briannezhad•28m ago•1 comments

Show HN: A fast TUI for managing Azure Key Vault secrets written in Rust

https://github.com/jkoessle/akv-tui-rs
1•jkoessle•28m ago•0 comments

eInk UI Components in CSS

https://eink-components.dev/
1•edent•29m ago•0 comments

Discuss – Do AI agents deserve all the hype they are getting?

2•MicroWagie•32m ago•0 comments

ChatGPT is changing how we ask stupid questions

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2026/02/06/stupid-questions-ai/
2•edward•32m ago•1 comments
Open in hackernews

US backpedals as Hyundai factory ICE raid enrages South Korea

https://www.theregister.com/2025/09/16/us_hyundai_immigration/
38•rntn•4mo ago

Comments

legitster•4mo ago
Steven Shrank, HSI agent in charge of the raid:

“This was not a immigration operation where agents went into the premises, rounded up folks, and put them on buses. This has been a multi-month criminal investigation where we have developed evidence and conducted interviews, gathered documents and presented that evidence to the court in order to obtain a judicial search warrant.”

I like that when justifying the raid, the agent in charge of the raid tacitly admitted they do regularly just burst onto a premise and round up people for buses.

It's worth pointing out that the people behind this raid are not recently appointed hacks - and that this was not at the direct mandate of the current administration. What is actually happening here is the entire agency is staffed with attack dogs who act without impunity or shame. And the only difference is that they feel emboldened to act, and whoever was in charge of oversight to hold them back is no longer there.

mixmastamyk•4mo ago
Did they break the law or not? That should be the focus of the discussion, rather than political posturing.
potato3732842•4mo ago
I bet it'll come down to some sort of specific verbiage within the law that could be interpreted either way depending on who's lawyers you listen to.

That's how these sort of BigCo regulatory compliance things almost always go.

schlauerfox•4mo ago
The 'beauty' of fascistic uneven enforcement is the law doesn't matter anymore, everything is in bad faith and corrupt and they can punish their enemies and reward their sycophants at their whim.
bryanlarsen•4mo ago
Of course they broke the law, it's pretty much impossible not to. It's a popular assertion that the average citizen unknowingly commits three felonies per day. And that's people who aren't interacting with the highly complex immigration system. I'm sure most forgot to dot an i or cross a t on their form or something.
sickofparadox•4mo ago
The idea that the average person in America commits even one felony a day is so ridiculous it falls flat on its face after being spoken. How can you even say something like that without feeling embarrassed for believing it?
bryanlarsen•4mo ago
https://www.amazon.ca/Three-Felonies-Day-Target-Innocent/dp/...
potato3732842•4mo ago
Read the book. It's not about "lying on this form is a felony" and "posessing X much coke" type stuff. It's more about the ambiguity of the law and enforcement discretion than anything else. Think like Martha Steward "well you said X to us and despite believing it in good faith at the time we can prove that on day Y you were informed of Z therefore lied to us, therefore we can prosecute this as a felony if we so choose" type of fact patterns.
anonymousab•4mo ago
Accessing a single website with adblock installed is, in and of itself, potentially thousands of CFAA violations if enforced to the letter.
pharrington•4mo ago
Is this legal advise?
JumpCrisscross•4mo ago
> Did they break the law or not?

The point is everyone may have broken the law. Hyundai. These individuals. And the ICE agents acting outside the colour of law.

mixmastamyk•4mo ago
Book 'em, Danno.
etblg•4mo ago
Well it's American immigration law, so who knows, really depends person by person. Like I legitimately think there isn't an objective answer to that question, it's a patchwork of laws and forms and guidelines that overlap and are interpreted by different people. Two different border agents can have completely different opinions on whether your work trip can be counted under a B1/B2 visa or not, and then USCIS (not CBP, border agents, but the immigration services agency, a completely different department) could have a different idea.
mixmastamyk•4mo ago
I've traveled to many countries on visas, and once for work. It's made very clear if you are allowed to work or not.
legitster•4mo ago
> That should be the focus of the discussion, rather than political posturing.

Counterpoint: the policy of how we treat foreign workers is a policy discussion. Even if it's legal to round them up and deny them due process, it (a) shouldn't be and (b) is going to overall hurt our economy and make America a less desirable place to do business.

mixmastamyk•4mo ago
Has someone reputable reported/shown they've been denied due process? Here's a lawyer talking about his clients, which doesn't sound like they've been denied it:

https://www.politifact.com/article/2025/sep/10/south-korea-w...

You (or I) may not like the law or policy, but that should be a separate discussion. We have rules; they should be followed. If they are bad they should be changed.

UncleMeat•4mo ago
Treatment of people after they break the law is important to our system of liberty. "Well they broke the law so anything goes" is a nightmare.
mixmastamyk•4mo ago
Were they brutalized in some fashion? Lining up and walking to a detention room or bus is standard. What you’d get at the airport, for example. Cuffs common when outside. I’ve experienced it myself. It’s neither here nor there as long as you get your day in court.

(I understand some jarheads or managers might want to make a show of it, and probably should be reprimanded if so.)

But the process is the process and an acceptable compromise. I get the feeling everyone passing judgment here has little info on the situation on the ground—news soundbites are not enough.

UncleMeat•4mo ago
There have already been articles written about their experience, not news soundbites.
mathgradthrow•4mo ago
If there is a tacit admission of such a thing, it's not in the quote you provided.
muwtyhg•4mo ago
> This was not a immigration operation where agents went into the premises, rounded up folks, and put them on buses

This quote implies that there are immigration operations where people do these things, and that this particular instance is not an example of that type of operation.

mathgradthrow•4mo ago
No, it doesn't.
muwtyhg•4mo ago
Yes, it does.
potato3732842•4mo ago
Exactly.

BigCo is angry the .gov thugs showed up unannounced and dragged their dicks all over everything like they're the goddamn DEA seizing the entire contents of an autobody shop because one of the techs was involved in drug running shit.

The .gov thugs respond "we didn't abuse you like some little fish, we akshually built a case" as if that justfies it.

Everyone should be enraged by both sides here because both sides statements are clearly predicated on the assumption that what they do is perfectly ok.

BigCo shouldn't be getting away with "it looks good if you squint and my lawyer will tell you why" sketchy compliance stuff that the little guy can't. And the .gov should be treating the little guy with the same respect that they would a BigCo who can pay a big law firm to get their stuff in order.

glitchc•4mo ago
Who else can bust BigCo's balls if not big .gov? A tension between these two entities is the best outcome. It's when they collude that the little guys get screwed.
xenadu02•4mo ago
Even if there was some technical immigration violation here its not like any of the people involved were some sort of flight risk or criminal masterminds.

They could have simply notified the company and the people about a potential problem with their visas/paperwork and asked them to provide documentation otherwise or if their visas were expired/improper to return to Korea and apply for a new visa.

daft_pink•4mo ago
I think it makes sense since this was a techincal violation where they improperly used the Visa Waiver Program instead of applying for B-1 visas. They almost certainly would have received as employees of a South Korean chaebol—highly reputable, well-documented employers that consular officers typically view as strong B-1 cases for short-term business travel. South Koreans vigorously compete to work at these corporations and while 1 or 2 migth have been denied. It’s highly doubtful that a US consular officer would view them as a flight risk.
acdha•4mo ago
> I think it makes sense since this was a technical violation where they improperly used the Visa Waiver Program

Has even this been established? It sounds like the question is whether their work falls outside of the business allowed under that program, and the terminology doesn’t appear to be well-defined enough to say.

sampo•4mo ago
This September 4 raid happened 12 days ago. It has been in the news daily. It has its own Wikipedia article. But I haven't found any source that would clearly tell whether the workers had valid and legal work visas or not and/or if they in their situation would have needed such.