frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Easy Color Theory: A Beginner's Guide [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qe_m7PdQH2U
1•ibobev•34s ago•0 comments

Cursor Data Exfiltration with Mermaid.js

https://embracethered.com/blog/posts/2025/cursor-data-exfiltration-with-mermaid/
1•datadrivenangel•42s ago•0 comments

The performance impact of vertex shader exports

https://interplayoflight.wordpress.com/2025/09/21/the-performance-impact-of-vertex-shader-exports/
1•ibobev•1m ago•0 comments

China Road Trip Exposes List of Uninvestable Assets in the West

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/private-equity/china-road-trip-exposes-list-of-uninvestable-assets-...
1•clcaev•1m ago•0 comments

What was Euclid doing? [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-MgQC6z3VU
1•ibobev•1m ago•0 comments

California issues historic fine over lawyer's ChatGPT fabrications

https://calmatters.org/economy/technology/2025/09/chatgpt-lawyer-fine-ai-regulation/
2•geox•2m ago•0 comments

Nvidia to Invest $100B in OpenAI

https://www.reuters.com/business/nvidia-invest-100-billion-openai-2025-09-22/
3•sz4kerto•2m ago•0 comments

The Event Sourcing Database Guide I Wish Existed Earlier

https://www.eventsourcingdatabase.com
1•goloroden•2m ago•0 comments

Social media is splitting views of Charlie Kirk's death

https://www.npr.org/2025/09/20/nx-s1-5542353/charlie-kirk-jimmy-kimmel-social-media
2•speckx•5m ago•0 comments

Why behavior beats device and network in bot detection (benchmarks inside)

https://research.roundtable.ai/bot-benchmarking/
1•timshell•5m ago•0 comments

A board member's perspective of the RubyGems controversy

https://apiguy.substack.com/p/a-board-members-perspective-of-the
1•janpio•6m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Grow and Monitor Your AI Search Traffic

https://www.spiderseek.com
3•asteroidandy•8m ago•0 comments

RSS Feeds of Your Fav Shows for Cal or Tor

https://episodefeed.com/
1•sqwrell•10m ago•1 comments

Global Call for AI Red Lines

https://red-lines.ai/
1•TheAceOfHearts•10m ago•0 comments

Testing is better than Data Structures and Algorithms

https://nedbatchelder.com/blog/202509/testing_is_better_than_dsa.html
1•rsyring•10m ago•0 comments

Memory Allocation in Go

https://nghiant3223.github.io/2025/06/03/memory_allocation_in_go.html
1•todsacerdoti•11m ago•0 comments

Steve Jobs, Jef Raskin, and the first great war for your thumbs

https://aresluna.org/steve-jobs-jef-raskin-and-the-first-great-war-for-your-thumbs/
1•todsacerdoti•12m ago•0 comments

Energy users 'could save £5B a year' if gas plants are removed from market

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/sep/04/electricity-users-save-5bn-a-year-gas-fired-stat...
1•PaulHoule•12m ago•0 comments

Israel's Kinneret Lake replenished with desalinated water – The Jerusalem Post

https://share.google/PVCiiCqnX63T7jY25
1•tomerbd•12m ago•0 comments

Hey, Let's Undermine America's Technology, Education and Research

https://paulkrugman.substack.com/p/hey-lets-undermine-americas-technology
1•pavel_lishin•13m ago•0 comments

Herenow.js: privacy-respecting, visitor counter – shows you how many users here

https://wgx.github.io/herenow/
2•wgx•16m ago•0 comments

Architecting pandemic infrastructure at a human scale

https://nakedinstinct.xyz/from-heathrow-to-gibraltar-architecting-pandemic-infrastructure-at-a-hu...
1•mooreds•17m ago•0 comments

Beyond OpenJDK builds, announcing openjdk-mobile.github.io

https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/mobile-dev/2025-August/000985.html
1•nativeforks•18m ago•0 comments

Some iPhone 17, 17 Pro, Air Users Experiencing Intermittent Wi-Fi Issue

https://www.macrumors.com/2025/09/22/iphone-17-pro-air-wifi-cutting-out-issue/
3•tosh•20m ago•0 comments

OpenAI and Nvidia Announce Partnership to Deploy 10GW of Nvidia Systems

https://openai.com/index/openai-nvidia-systems-partnership/
11•meetpateltech•22m ago•1 comments

SWE-Bench Pro

https://github.com/scaleapi/SWE-bench_Pro-os
3•tosh•23m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Tensorpack a CLI tool for semantic discovery across datasets

1•AyodeleFikayomi•23m ago•0 comments

La Machine

https://la-machine.fr
5•oliviermevel•24m ago•0 comments

Show HN: An AI Career Agent to help professionals stay relevant and visible

https://www.vulk.ai/
2•sanduckhan•25m ago•0 comments

Chowa Blogging Editor

https://chowa.tech/
1•smooke•26m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Show HN: Zenode – an AI-powered electronic component search engine

https://zenode.ai/
14•bbourn•1h ago
TL;DR - My cofounder Collin and I built an AI version of Digi-Key to help PCB designers find and use parts, except with a way bigger catalog, modern refinement tools, and an AI that can actually read the damn datasheets for you.

*The problem*

Modern circuit board design is filled with absurdly tedious tasks, where one small mistake can brick a project and cost thousands. The worst (in our opinion) is reading datasheets, which eats up to 25% of the first part of any project: 1. First, you slog through catalogs to find viable parts, using search tools that are still stuck in the dark ages. There are ~80M unique components in today’s supply chain, yet the tools we have to look through them are just digitized versions of the same paper catalogs our grandparents got in the mail.

2. During the design, you spend a ton of time flipping between different 10-100-page PDFs for every component in every subcircuit, hoping like hell you don’t miss some tiny spec in a footnote somewhere that kills your design.

3. And god help you when the requirements inevitably change and now you have to figure out what subsystems are affected!

*What we built*

Zenode is an AI-powered electronics search engine that actually helps engineers find and understand components. Our core features: 1. Largest and Deepest Part Catalog → We have merged dozens of existing part catalogs and documents from major distributors and manufacturers

2. Discovery Search → natural language queries to quickly find categories, set filters, and rank results

3. Modern Parametric Filters → rebuilt from scratch to move off the string values pervasive in industry and build numeric ranges that actually work.

4. Interactive Documents → AI constrained to a single part’s datasheet/manuals. Ask a question, get the answer with a highlighted source for quick reference.

5. Deep Dive → search across dozens of parts simultaneously (“what’s the lowest-power accelerometer available?”) instead of slogging one by one.

*What we learned*

1. By far the hardest part of the last 2 years has been wrangling 3 TB of messy, inconsistent data into something usable. We had to teach the AI how to handle hand-drawn figures, normalize different unit variables and names that mean the same thing, and navigate conflicting information present between different datasheet versions of the same part. It’s been a nightmare

2. We originally built custom PDF parsers and AI extractors, which were best in class for ~3 months until generalized AI passed them. So we stopped reinventing wheels and doubled down on data quality instead.

3. The killer feature wasn’t the AI searching a single part, but what we heard repeatedly from users is that they want the AI to read across multiple parts, hence why we’ve launched deep dive!

*Where it’s strong*

- Speed: rips through a 1,000-page microcontroller datasheet in seconds.

- Breadth: 40M+ part sources unified into one catalog, and more than just datasheets, application notes, errata, etc.

- Comparisons: Deep Dive lets you ask across multiple parts, not just one at a time.

*Where it’s not*

- Pricing/availability: currently outdated (for now we expect folks to check existing aggregators like Octopart).

- Accuracy: good enough to match my mediocre skills; not yet at Collin's level, but we're starting tuning and this will improve rapidly!

*Try it*

It’s live today (zenode.ai). Sign up for a free account and If you put “Hacker News” in during signup in the “where did you hear about us” field, we’ll give you 1,000 bonus credits (once we finish building that, so sometime this week ).

*Feedback we’d love*

1. Should Deep Dive results auto-become filters you can refine further?

2. Do you want the ability to mark preferred parts / exclude others?

3. Is “Deep Dive on a BOM” (alt discovery + manufacturability checks on a list of known components from different categories) the killer feature?

Comments

sofia44•1h ago
Real neat! This tool could fill some tough gaps. This only works if there’s accuracy - is there a way to flag incorrect answers on the program?
bbourn•1h ago
No, we had those built a few versions back, but nobody used them and they were a pain to maintain so we took them out
rchaudhary•1h ago
Congrats on launch. Two questions from a user perspective. 1) How do you handle spec changes across document revisions? 2) Can users export the analysis with links to the exact tables and figures in the PDFs?
bbourn•1h ago
Solid questions, you've clearly been burned before lol. 1) Document revisions can be a bit hard to handle, but we currently look for any dates or document numbers present, and when possible we just show the latest. However, plenty of times there are no dates OR revision numbers, and we'll get different documents from multiple sources. In this case we show all the documents, and have prompted the AI to flag this risk to the user if the question is answered differently between documents. Not the ideal approach, but working with what we're getting...

2) Hmm, not really. You can share the chat, and the specific response, but the only way to export the source would be to screenshot it... Adding it to our list of potential next features!

rchaudhary•1h ago
Appreciate the detailed response. Showing all conflicting docs and flagging inconsistent answers is a practical interim step. Long term, version tracking across sources could be a real differentiator since engineers live and die by revision history. On exports, even a lightweight “copy link to figure/table” feature would go a long way for collaboration.
benmathes•1h ago
I see the value here. The problem isn't just the search; it's the trust. The biggest hurdle for Zenode won't be the tech, but convincing an engineer that your AI's summary of a footnote is accurate enough to risk a $10,000 board spin. That's a high bar.

I'd argue the core value isn't just a better search or a faster reader. It's about providing a verified, reliable source of truth. This brings up a key tension: you say the AI isn't yet at your co-founder's level of accuracy, but is that precisely the level of confidence required to replace an engineer's manual check? How do you close that gap? You've got the data, but the trust factor is a different threshold?

I.e. maybe you've built the tool to make the problem faster, but the real win would be a tool that makes the problem safer? The killer feature might not be more speed, but rather a confidence score on every AI-generated fact, with a clear path to the source document so an engineer can verify it. It’s not about avoiding the document entirely; it’s about having a better starting point and knowing exactly what to double-check.

ctstoner•1h ago
Agreed - trust is the key! That's why we've built in sources with links to the exact location in the datasheet and part documents where the AI found an answer. We're working hard to make sure you can trust its answers, but we know most engineers 'trust but verify'. A (transparent) confidence score is a great idea to improve trust in the answer and sources.

To close the gap, we've built our own Q/A datasets and are training custom AIs how to search and read a datasheet (like a new engineer needs to learn early on). We're concentrating on teaching the AI how to identify key information vs noise as it relates to electrical engineering (differences like 'Voltage' in the Absolute Max vs Recommended section) and where information is likely to be found in a datasheet or app note.

GraemeWiltrout•1h ago
This is awesome! Way better than DigiKey’s search.
bbourn•1h ago
Thanks, that's why we built it! We're big digikey fans, and have spent hundreds of hours on the site, but that doesn't mean it's without room for improvement!
ctstoner•1h ago
Who we are We’re electrical engineers who have lived this pain firsthand for a decade; Brandon (OP) has designed a dozen boards, while I have built over 250 through production. Years ago we spun up a brand-new product line in two weeks to help salvage a $150M deal. That meant 18-hour days spent picking parts, doing CAD, paying $$$$$ for three-day prototypes and praying everything worked (one did blow up when we accidentally shorted 3 kV into a metal screw on the desk, we nearly died cause of a sleepy brainfart :dizzy_face:). Even from that working version, it took an additional four months of redesigns to get through certifications and into production. When ChatGPT shocked the world in ’22, we realized that the initial superpower of AI in electronics isn’t in generating designs (too risky — one mistake kills the board), but in digesting the endless unstructured documentation that plagues (benefits? :thinking_face:) our industry.
ccamrobertson•1h ago
I'm toying around with a custom board and searching here is far better than shuffling through the old Digikey filters. Awesome!
bbourn•1h ago
Awesome, that was one of the top reasons we built it, tired of clicking on strings lol. What are you working on specifically? Would love to chat and see what we can do to help!
ccamrobertson•1h ago
I'm playing with modifying a BitAxe design (https://github.com/bitaxeorg) by allowing for more chips on a single board. It's theoretically pretty simple, but locating a buck that can handle the current I want to support is tricky!
ctstoner•1h ago
You should be able to drop the specs you need into the zenode search and get some options; there's always so many choices for buck converters!

Are you looking at a multiphase design? I think I've seen a few chips that control multiphase converters: You'd get a much higher current design with just one IC (and a few extra inductors).

KDunc•1h ago
Congrats on your launch! What's your moat? The big AI players are getting better at reading datasheets and providing contextual guidance and info. It seems like it won't be long until ChatGPT and others will be able to do what your tool does. Thoughts?
bbourn•1h ago
Yeah, Moat's are tricky in the age of AI. We think there's always room for a standalone interface in this niche sector, given the sheer amount of data that needs to get presented (with no room for hallucinations). But beyond the data curation (which is actually quite hard) and the custom UI, there's also all the tuning data to optimize for the workflows that come next, like Alternates, schematic awareness, etc.

But yes, OpenAI continues to be the 800lb gorilla 'boogeyman' crushing startups with every new update. Our goal is to remain cockroaches until we find solid distribution!

sonaliv•1h ago
How does this differentiate from Digi-Key’s parametric search or Octopart’s aggregation?
bbourn•54m ago
Digikey's parametrics were the best in industry prior to ours, but they were still really painful to use because of the strings. But to even get to the parametrics, you first have to know in advance the category and subcategory names of the part you're looking for. There are over 3000 different categories, so even once you're pretty good, you're always asking yourself "is what i'm looking for in the logic category or the amplifier category". With Zenode, all this is handled using natural language! And we did a huge overhaul on the parametrics, we turned the strings into structured values and built modern filters that are just waaay easier to use.

Octopart is a bit of a different beast from us. They're crushing the pricing and availability data, which is actually hard to get (a LOT of business development to get access to the realtime values from the distributors themselves). Plus they have a really massive catalog, definitely broader than ours, but they don't have the depth (i.e. the detailed spec and documentation data) that we do because we went to the manufacturer websites to obtain that.

caromexia2•1h ago
Congrats on the launch! How much of the component selection pain is actually on the supply chain side? Like, engineers pick parts, but then procurement has to source them without really understanding the technical tradeoffs. Have you talked to purchasing teams about this?
bbourn•1h ago
We're learning a lot here, since this always happened AFTER we handed over the BOM. It certainly seems like a pain, particularly when a supplier ends up being a critical bottleneck (always late, overcharging, etc). The number one requested feature from these folks is a way to validate an alternate component, something they can use for themselves BEFORE passing it over to us design engineers for approval (heard some pretty spicy takes on doing this, apparently working with EE's isn't always sunshine and rainbows...)
jkontulis•1h ago
When normalizing specs across manufacturers, how do you handle cases where units aren’t directly comparable (e.g., different test conditions for “low power” claims, or different temperature reference points)? That’s often where human engineers end up second-guessing the catalog data.
ctstoner•47m ago
We typically take the 'nominal' value in the datasheet's electrical specs table for parametric specs. If the manufacturer is trying to be sneaky by providing the value with perfect test conditions to improve the numbers, we still give the value because there's no other way to give a credible answer.

However, we saved all the test conditions and similar notes. Maybe we could display the conditions with the specs in the table? That way, any outlier manufacturers would jump out right away.

jbryben•56m ago
Congrats on the launch! Toyed around a bit with the site and seems really intuitive; though I used a few of your prebuilt suggestions: "A thermal fuse rated for 75°C and 10A, An optocoupler with 1.5kV isolation, and 5V LDO with 1A output" for example and all come back as not available/no parts available. Just FYI not sure if you want the autofilled suggestions to be the ones that don't produce the results.
bbourn•53m ago
Well, that's super annoying, we definitely don't want that, thanks for finding and letting us know! We'll have it fixed shortly.
alejandravl1901•37m ago
This seems to be incredibly helpful, even if it's not 100% accurate. Then again, isn't that what chatGPT is for? How should I think about Zenode vs. a more generic AI search engine?
ctstoner•29m ago
The difference between Zenode and something like Perplexity is that Zenode is built specifically for electronics, so it's trained specifically for searching electronics, and the data is much more detailed for electronics. Perplexity has to be good at everything; Zenode is specialized, so it just needs to be the best at working with electronics!