frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Open in hackernews

Big Tech Told Kids to Code. The Jobs Didn’t Follow [audio]

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/29/podcasts/the-daily/big-tech-told-kids-to-code-the-jobs-didnt-follow.html
35•voxadam•1h ago

Comments

voxadam•1h ago
https://archive.is/JiTmI
nerevarthelame•44m ago
This isn't helpful because the submission is for a podcast which is neither paywalled in the original link, nor captured in the archived link.
oytis•39m ago
A transcription would be useful though. A rare case for AI gizmos to be useful, and noone cared to integrate it.
xnx•29m ago
> "We aim to make transcripts available the next workday after an episode’s publication"

I'm not sure why they're not available immediately. It can't take that long to format and correct Whisper output.

dredmorbius•21m ago
The podcast media URL would be more useful this case. As it's highly obscured:

<https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/pdst.fm/e/pfx.vpixl.com...> (MP3)

some_guy_nobel•1h ago
I know a few people who graduated with a CS degree in the last 2 years who have given up completely, at least in the short-term, on finding tech jobs. A few tried pivoting to tech sales but found difficulties there as well. I also know a few who landed tech jobs. Those with more success were definitely more interested in the subject, and continued coding during the (+6 month) job search, while those who ended up giving up seemed pretty sour on coding from the get go, lamenting their choice of degree.

I suspect an H1B decision reduction is a step in the correct direction here, but

jmclnx•30m ago
>I suspect an H1B decision reduction is a step in the correct direction here, but

Already being changing. Singapore is now exempt. As more palms are greased, I am sure more exemptions will follow.

some_guy_nobel•2m ago
True, it's almost certainly for show and will amount to nothing, as with most things in this/every administration.
AznHisoka•22m ago
What percentage of current software engineers are H1b? Would it even move the needle?
epolanski•10m ago
> I suspect an H1B decision reduction is a step in the correct direction here, but

I think this is a terrible idea that only helps those like your friends: people that got into tech because of job prospects but never cared about the field.

It's going to hurt American IT companies and in the end all IT workers if the field becomes less competitive and more mediocrity will survive.

some_guy_nobel•3m ago
> I think this is a terrible idea that only helps those like your friends

Well, it will also help the tens of thousands let go from top tech companies over the last two years, many of which do care about the field. I can assure you the fact that someone has an H1B says almost nothing about how much they 'care about the field'.

Legend2440•56m ago
That's life unfortunately, demand goes up and demand goes down.

There is no degree that guarantees success, no job that lasts forever, and no guru with the secret to happiness. You've just got to be clever and adaptable and stay on your toes.

cyanydeez•55m ago
you could always support collective policies to address massive shifts in society.

No one in modern society is completely helpless or lone wolf unless they truly want to believe that.

Legend2440•16m ago
No thanks, actually. I’m pretty happy with the status quo.

If jobs were guaranteed regardless of demand, allocation of labor would be less efficient, and we’d all be poorer on average.

happytoexplain•37m ago
"It's natural" is a lie we tell to shift profit from the masses to the rich. There is nothing uncontrollable about the human behavior we call economics.
lukan•32m ago
"There is nothing uncontrollable about the human behavior we call economics."

Indeed. All it takes is a world government and tight surveillance and enforcement and for sure human behavior can be controlled.

Still, who controlls the controller?

monknomo•24m ago
Are you sure it is government that is doing the surveillance and enforcement?
Dylan16807•21m ago
If the thing you want to change is the percent of money that the rich have, you mostly need to adjust taxes, not elaborately micromanage the world.
xg15•21m ago
Good old TINA, because no other economic theory exists in the universe than laissez faire capitalism...

I'd at least have expected some more original retorts than just canned slogans though.

hackthemack•15m ago
I do not know what to make of this comment. It is so much of what you see on social media that derails constructive conversation. There is nothing terribly wrong with the comment but it feels adjacent to low effort. To make your point, you have constructed a scenario that may or may not happen, but, to me, it lacks introspection and "arguing in good faith".

I am not even disputing what you have stated as a possibility. It is just, there are other possibilities. Maybe the Government Pension Fund of Norway is a good counter example to what you propose?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_Pension_Fund_of_Nor...

Governments influence economics all the time in subtle and not so subtle ways.

loa_in_•13m ago
But it's us who wrote current laws, not some magical entity.
keanb•23m ago
So since “big tech” told kids to code now they have to hire them and keep them in an office twiddling their thumbs?
fluoridation•19m ago
Human behavior is only one half of economics. There are real, physical limitations that make it so not absolutely everyone can live like a king.
kylehotchkiss•35m ago
Incorrect. Tenured government jobs in some developing countries offer housing, protection from firing, and success if your definition of success is not needing to try ever again. Good luck on the search, you're competing with 1,000,000 equally qualified applicants for that position.
fullshark•16m ago
Consider if it is possible that having kids start their working life in crippling debt to get jobs that don't exist is something we don't actually want as a society? Is it something that we can avoid and is not actually "life?"
lawlessone•14m ago
>That's life unfortunately, demand goes up and demand goes down.

Unless it's my life, then it's different.

>No thanks, actually. I’m pretty happy with the status quo.

Ok don't come crying when things change and you're no longer on top.

benbojangles•54m ago
it's been like this for decades, there's been a huge amount of peddling lies and untruths regarding tech jobs and careers.
Braxton1980•42m ago
What lie? Some people have tech jobs. If I tell you plumbing is a good industry to get into why would you infer a job is guaranteed?
kulahan•18m ago
If you say it? I wouldn't infer that.

If the president, media, teachers, influencers, the richest people on the planet, and my parents say it? I probably would. I think it's disingenuous to imply this wasn't strongly recommended as the ideal way to get a high paying job straight out of college that only improves over time.

bogwog•25m ago
Bad for the people who wasted time and money getting the degree, good for the people who can pay lower wages now that supply is so far ahead of demand (at least at the entry level)
lagniappe•18m ago
The degree in this field is optional.
mrguyorama•54m ago
The point was not that Big Tech wanted more programmers because they would have more job postings.

The point was that Big Tech wanted more competition in the labor market to drive down programmer wages.

As they have demonstrated time and time again, the CFOs at "Big Tech" companies abhor paying programmers what they are worth. They do not care that they make $1 million in profit for your work, they hate that they pay you $300k, and they are willing to do anything (including multiple cases of illegal conspiracy) to pay you less than that.

I think hiring is less bleak here on the east coast.

Software Developers in most of these large companies are underpriced.

Legend2440•36m ago
Ehhh they are paying software developers a good deal more than they are worth in any other industry or country.

You’re not going to convince me that $300k is underpriced, that’s doctor/lawyer pay without having to spend 10 years in med school. Dev salaries are a bubble.

lordnacho•23m ago
A doctor can only see so many patients. A lawyer can only bill so many hours.

A dev can make a product that a billion people use.

oytis•19m ago
Can they? Lots of well-paid devs were laid off in the recent years, where are the products with billions users they have made?
simgt•13m ago
Can you still breathe, at such high altitude on this horse?
Bukhmanizer•21m ago
Compared to the money that tech companies make, way underpriced.

The reason that companies pay engineers more than in other industries/countries, is that in general companies in other industries/countries don’t make nearly as much as SV companies.

The implicit contract goes as follows: You pay ~50,000 engineers around $400,000/year, and you essentially get a money printer and get to be one of the richest people in the world. Who wouldn’t take that trade?

In general, you can’t do that in any other country or industry.

oytis•16m ago
Big Tech companies make money by extracting value from other parts of economy. Not only developers are normally not the ones creating that value, they are also not the only part of the mechanism that extracts it - sales, marketing and legal are at least as important
Legend2440•11m ago
Big tech doesn’t generally make money by selling software.

They make money through monopoly effects on their social networks and ad platforms. They need some devs to build/maintain that platform of course, but devs are not as core to their business as they think they are. The monopoly status is the money printer.

cramsession•16m ago
How much does the CEO of a hospital make vs say Mark Zuckerberg?
tester756•5m ago
>You’re not going to convince me that $300k is underpriced, that’s doctor/lawyer pay without having to spend 10 years in med school. Dev salaries are a bubble.

How many years of learning at home good developers needs?

oytis•34m ago
It's not that there was some conspiracy to get more people into software. Software is fun, pays well and is accessible - no wonder more people wanted (and still want) to get into it.
0cf8612b2e1e•34m ago
Not sure that I see this as some concerted effort of the man vs normal people looking at the landscape of jobs. Relative to education requirements, tech has been an amazing opportunity for many. Pretty common to see posts on tech forums of humble bragging about high salaries, low effort, or ease of job hopping (for even higher compensation).

Even using $300k as an example of a programmer getting ripped off relative to their worth -few industries afford opportunities to make anywhere near that much money. The median US pay is ~$40k.

shahbaby•17m ago
This shouldn't be down voted.

If you ever get a chance to hear the C suite talk to an audience that's not primarily engineers, this is exactly how they think.

Remeber their job for which they get paid more in one year than you will in several life times is to make those numbers go up.

If you were getting paid that much, what wouldn't you be willing to do, say or believe?

csallen•13m ago
This idea that a job is inherently "worth" some amount of money is way off.

The entire point of a market economy is that prices are driven by supply and demand. Salaries are just prices.

If more and more people are capable of delivering high quality software, but the demand for it doesn't increase at the same rate, then it should be worth less.

Furthermore, hirers are evil people for wanting to pay less, any more than job seekers are evil people for wanting to get paid more, or shoppers are evil people for wanting a discount. The supply side is always going to want higher prices, and the demand side is always going to want lower.

dasil003•7m ago
I don't disagree that business will always try to drive down labor costs, but this is kind of a weird take given west coast tech companies are the ones that normalized $500k-$1m total comp for the rank and file software engineers with 5-10 years experience. East coast, let alone the rest of the world never even sniffed that until FAANG set the standard.
jqpabc123•44m ago
Sorry, tech is moving to China.

It's a cultural thing. The USA never has and probably never will really value technical talent.

    "Noone gets paid until something gets sold".
I heard this mantra over and over again from US business leadership during my technical career.

It never occurred to them that nothing gets sold until something gets built. They just took that part for granted.

hippo22•31m ago
I think both engineering and sales take the customer for granted.

Engineering often views their role as taking in specs and outputting product with little regard to whether or not the product is actually worth buying.

Sales views customers as a resource to exploit rather than an entity to serve.

Both sides have gotten so far and lazy from American hegemony that it’s no surprise China has usurped the US.

fluoridation•5m ago
When that's true, I don't think that's the fault of either of those divisions. The job of one is to build things, and the job of the other is to sell things, and that's it. Considering and analyzing the customer's needs would probably fall under R&D or market research, and piping those findings into other divisions would have to be the job of leadership. So in other words, if a company is making and selling things nobody wants, it's the fault of the decision makers.
mingus88•10m ago
> nothing gets sold until something gets built

Never dealt with salespeople before?

You don’t have to look hard for examples of sales promising things that engineering then has to try and deliver. I think Dilbert comics from the 90s rang that bell nearly every week.

billy99k•2m ago
China? Lol. Their econony has been built on mostly stolen IP. I don't know any major piece of software or hardware innovations coming out of China.

In the 90s they innovated lethal injection drugs.

babblingfish•37m ago
The juxtaposition in the headline implies that A.I. coding tools are the cause of unemployment for new grads. I find this sort of headline to be intentionally misleading. But sadly, A.I. gets clicks. There's no evidence that A.I. coding tools are causative of unemployment. The simpler and more likely explanation is that big tech companies overhired during the pandemic and now are doing layoffs to adjust course. Correlation being presented as causation is lazy reporting.

> As the industry embraces A.I. coding tools, computer science graduates say they’re struggling to land tech jobs.

xnx•30m ago
The story provides multiple explanations for the difficult job market, not just (or even primarily) AI.
srj•22m ago
I've seen zero job loss from AI but substantial job loss to off-shoring. What you said about over-hiring I think is also true, but if you look at headcount numbers they have dropped only marginally. The geographic distribution of that headcount however has shifted in a big way to India, Latin America, and Eastern Europe. The reason is obvious, people in those countries are paid far less (often 1/3 or 1/4) compared to their US counterparts.

It seems this rarely gets discussed in the media though. As you said, AI gets more readership attention. I also get the impression people feel there's something culturally offensive about discussing off-shoring.

billy99k•4m ago
I knew lots of people that got into coding in the early 2000s and couldn't find a job after graduation.

Why? They just took the classes and expected a cushy job.

I, on the other hand, worked on lots of my own projects and contributed to open source. I had a job lined up after graduation and haven't been out of work since.

Most of them got out of tech completely.

You can't just expect to follow a list of pre-written steps and then get rich from it. Life has never worked this way, but people continue to expect it.

We're All Going to Die – Soonish

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/27/opinion/grok-ai-companions-x.html
1•whack•42s ago•0 comments

RISC-V Conditional Moves

https://www.corsix.org/content/riscv-conditional-moves
1•matt_d•3m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Getting the Best Bang for Your Buck for Your Blogging Infra

https://bozhidar.me/blog/bang-for-buck-blog-infra/
1•BenGosub•7m ago•0 comments

Meta Horizon Hyperscape Capture: an impressive way to capture places

https://skarredghost.com/2025/09/29/meta-horizon-hyperscape-capture-review-2/
1•LorenDB•8m ago•0 comments

Any level of alcohol consumption increases risk of dementia

https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2025-09-24-any-level-alcohol-consumption-increases-risk-dementia
1•amichail•9m ago•0 comments

That Gmail Delivery Status Notification Is Probably a Scam

https://lifehacker.com/tech/gmail-delivery-status-notification-scam
1•bariumbitmap•10m ago•0 comments

The smallest number that is infinite

https://lemire.me/blog/2025/09/29/smallest-number-string-that-is-infinite/
1•LorenDB•12m ago•0 comments

ReverentGeek Calling Card

https://github.com/reverentgeek/reverentgeek-card
1•mooreds•13m ago•0 comments

Brazil's Homegrown Payment System Is Target of Trump Administration

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/29/world/americas/brazil-digital-payments.html
3•ChrisArchitect•13m ago•1 comments

Anthropic releases Claude Sonnet 4.5, claiming top coding performance

https://arstechnica.com/ai/2025/09/anthropic-says-its-new-ai-model-maintained-focus-for-30-hours-...
2•doener•14m ago•1 comments

Israel wants to train ChatGPT to be more pro-Israel

https://responsiblestatecraft.org/israel-chatgpt/
4•sporkxrocket•15m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: Let's Brainstorm how to run native IRIX on a N64!

1•DrNosferatu•15m ago•2 comments

I tracked down Tupac's godmother Assata Shakur, the FBI's most wanted in Cuba

https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/26/americas/essay-finding-assata-shakur-cuba-fbi-latam-intl
1•nadermx•15m ago•0 comments

Cycling the West Country

https://chillphysicsenjoyer.substack.com/p/cycling-the-west-country
1•crescit_eundo•16m ago•0 comments

YouTube Settles Trump Lawsuit for $24.5M

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/29/technology/youtube-trump-lawsuit-settlement.html
2•vinni2•18m ago•4 comments

Charlie Javice sentenced to 7 years in prison for $175M fraud

https://abcnews.go.com/Business/charlie-javice-founder-lied-175m-startup-faces-sentencing/story?i...
1•pseudolus•20m ago•0 comments

Repurpose gadgets as Arduino-ready modules

https://blog.arduino.cc/2025/09/05/repurpose-gadgets-as-arduino-ready-modules/
1•PaulHoule•21m ago•0 comments

Going down the rabbit hole of Postgres 18 features

https://xata.io/blog/going-down-the-rabbit-hole-of-postgres-18-features
3•tudorg•23m ago•0 comments

AI Smart Glasses Promise Workplace Wonders, Compliance Risks

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/artificial-intelligence/ai-smart-glasses-promise-workplace-wonders-...
1•hogwash•28m ago•0 comments

Technology Without Humanity Means Nothing

https://moneo.com.tr/blog/technology-without-humanity-means-nothing
6•emir•29m ago•0 comments

An open hardware printer you can understand, repair, and upgrade

https://www.crowdsupply.com/open-tools/open-printer
5•CharlesW•29m ago•0 comments

Cursor Can Control the Browser

https://twitter.com/cursor_ai/status/1972778817854067188
1•ecz•30m ago•0 comments

What Is Zero Trust Security? A Simple Guide for Businesses

https://polygraf.ai/what-is-zero-trust-security-a-simple-guide-for-businesses/
2•sarvarjafarov•32m ago•1 comments

Tile Tracking Tags Can Be Exploited

https://www.wired.com/story/tile-tracking-tags-can-be-exploited-by-tech-savvy-stalkers-researcher...
1•mspecter•35m ago•0 comments

The Game Engine that would not have been made without Rust

https://blog.vermeilsoft.com/2025-09-rust-game-engine/
3•zdw•37m ago•0 comments

Beneath the GDP, a Recession Warning

https://www.wsj.com/opinion/beneath-the-gdp-a-recession-warning-fff133de
1•paulpauper•42m ago•0 comments

Bans on highly toxic pesticides could save lives from suicide

https://ourworldindata.org/pesticide-bans-suicide-prevention
1•kamaraju•42m ago•0 comments

Million-year-old skull rewrites human evolution, scientists claim

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cdx01ve5151o
3•paulpauper•42m ago•0 comments

Essential books for modern technology leaders

https://www.hyperact.co.uk/blog/10-essential-books-for-modern-tech-leaders
2•imjacobclark•46m ago•0 comments

YouTube settles lawsuit challenging Section 230 for $25.4M

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60643878/178/trump-v-youtube-llc/
4•1vuio0pswjnm7•48m ago•3 comments