The counter-argument is that these tools are too narrowly scoped, but I think that's exactly what made them successful; their "no-code" tools provided a solution for a common problem.
Ultimately I agree with what you're getting at. There's never been a successful no-code, or even low-code, replacement for general purpose programming, and there never will be.
Thats probably verging on too high of a complexity for end users, but if you can obfuscate the black box and have it work well enough, it can definitely be big.
https://techcrunch.com/2018/09/13/microsoft-acquires-lobe-a-...
DataDaemon•1h ago
sjbr•1h ago
dmitrygr•1h ago
simonjgreen•52m ago
nicce•45m ago
dmitrygr•28m ago
It is basic market dynamics that the harder you make it to enter a market, the more reluctant entrants will be. Whether the regulation that makes market entry more difficult is "good" or "bad" is simply irrelevant.