frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Open in hackernews

Astronomers 'image' a mysterious dark object in the distant Universe

https://www.mpg.de/25518363/1007-asph-astronomers-image-a-mysterious-dark-object-in-the-distant-universe-155031-x
119•b2ccb2•4h ago

Comments

orliesaurus•3h ago
a far away civilization probably draining energy from the emptiness of space to power some AI datacenters /s
jsbisviewtiful•3h ago
Those gen AI images of cats playing poker won't create their own energy, you know T_T
excalibur•3h ago
It's our descendants. They had to travel back in time to escape entropy and find sufficient quantities of energy to sustain them, which is why they're 10 billion light years away.
DaveZale•3h ago
also, they didn't like what the future looked like
baggachipz•3h ago
They're blaming Tylenol?! That's it, we're out of here.
delichon•3h ago
That would be about 2.5 on the Kardashev scale, and in terms of heat, between Kim and Khloé on the Kardashian scale.
_joel•3h ago
Is that from the sci-fi novel "Dyson Fear" :)
Zigurd•3h ago
That vacuum is scary. Scary overpriced.
blackhaj7•2h ago
Haha, superb
daxfohl•3h ago
AI to the edge meant they had to port CUDA to a JS framework.
alansaber•2h ago
I look forwards to the python tutorial for building gpt-2 with string theory
DonHopkins•2h ago
That is literally the plot of the game Dyson Sphere Program.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_XqHWx-v_Y

jagged-chisel•3h ago
Is this the first time this article author has seen “image” used like this? We image human anatomy the same way - sophisticated algorithms take the output of CT, ultrasound, MRI and build something we can interpret visually.
momoschili•2h ago
why would you get that impression?
nonethewiser•2h ago
my read on it.

- the quotes around image in the title

- the commenter believes image is the correct word in a more literal sense

jagged-chisel•56m ago
It is also in quotes in one of the image captions
staplers•3h ago

  the lowest mass dark object currently measured

  one million times the mass of the Sun
Sometimes you read things that remind you how vast and untamable our universe really is.
catigula•3h ago
If you think that's crazy, it's likely a drop in the bucket comared to the noumenonal world.

There's no reason to think that our senses encompass the vast majority of understanding everything in reality and current evidence that they, in fact, do not, via dark matter as a primary source.

I suspect our senses encompass a meaningless fraction of the noumenon.

procflora•2h ago
In what way is dark matter not a phenomenon? Just because we don't know what it is doesn't make it a noumenon.
catigula•2h ago
It's that it demonstrates that some sort of noumenon can likely have partial but not 'full' overlap as we understand it with a phenomenon.

To elaborate, the noumenon can have properties that are unknown to us and outside the purview of certain senses (if not all) but still have partial phenomenal effects such as gravitational effects.

Given partial overlap, we could, and likely should, surmise that overlap, if partial, can also be zero. In fact, partial overlap with certain things (such as the gravitational field) but no sensory experience is exactly what we'd predict if this were true.

The mistake is thinking I'm asserting that things are phenomenon or noumenon when that's not quite right. Mostly, the supposition is that things can exist and have either 'full' (unlikely I think), partial, or zero overlap with our sensory experience. Things that demonstrably have partial overlap suggest a wider world of things. I simply find the idea that our evolved sensory experience encompass even a sizable fraction of reality to lack epistemic humility.

This is obviously speculative.

throwway120385•45m ago
A good example of this would be the scope of our sense of sight as it relates to the entire electromagnetic spectrum. We can't see things like UV or Gamma radiation, we can only infer their existence by their effect on things we can see. The reality is that those phenomena might not actually exist in any perceivable way. The only thing we know, strictly speaking, is that the effect happens, and we have a plausible mental model for why the effect happens that predicted other effects that we also observe. But we can't prove that the mental model is reality.

This is at the heart of the Allegory of The Cave: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegory_of_the_cave. What we're discussing is a kind of "Natural Philosophy" or Physics, the study of that which is.

_joel•3h ago
Yep, this still blows my mind, has a radius of 330 million light years, of, er, nothing (well 60 galaxies compared to what should be several thousand). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bo%C3%B6tes_Void
bobmcnamara•1h ago
sssh, that's where we store the hammers
GuB-42•2h ago
I think there is a shortcut being taken here.

We are surrounded by dark objects, a rock is a dark object, exoplanets are dark objects, and so are black holes. Pretty much everything but stars are dark objects. They are all dark because they don't emit light.

Here, I think they mean stuff (whatever it is) that can only be detected by gravitational lensing, and it makes sense that it has to be extremely heavy, because gravity is so weak.

RogerL•2h ago
I'm not a physicist but every definition of dark matter that I read says it does not interact with electromagnetic radiation hence it is invisible, and rocks are not that dark matter (wiki. NASA, etc)
lutusp•2h ago
> ... every definition of dark matter that I read says it does not interact with electromagnetic radiation ...

Actually, dark matter does interact with electromagnetic radiation -- it can deflect it, as in the case of gravitational lensing. But dark matter doesn't either emit nor absorb electromagnetic radiation directly.

We only know about dark matter because of its gravitational effects.

GuB-42•1h ago
How about stellar mass black holes?

They are much lighter than 1 million solar masses and we know a few of them, with a variety of ways to detect them, including companion stars orbiting around them and gravitational waves during mergers.

Black holes fit the definition of dark matter, as they neither emit nor absorb electromagnetic radiation, not in a way that could be detected anyways. This is the "MACHO" theory of dark matter, which is not the favorite, but it is still taken seriously. Stellar mass black holes have been ruled out, I think, but it doesn't mean dark matter can't be made of black holes. In fact, primordial black holes are a rather hot theory.

seanw444•2h ago
So how do we know that these "dark matter objects" aren't actually just massive collections of normal matter that is dim enough and at such a far distance that it would appear (angular resolution-wise) to be invisible, but we can still detect the lensing?
ianburrell•1h ago
There are a few reasons. It would be visible when backlit. Gravitational lensing detection limits the size so it can't planets (MACHOs). The CMB shows that only sixth of matter interacts with other matter, the rest is only interacts gravitationally.
lawlessone•1h ago
yeah all those other things absorb light so they can be detected by the light they block and the infrared light the re-emit.

Dark matter seems more ghostly , like gravitational shadow of matter

sixo•3h ago
Can someone knowledgeable weigh in: is the "dark object" here believed to be a localized blob of dark matter? A dark star or black hole? Or is "dark" being used generally to mean "not bright enough to see at this distance"?
bbarnett•3h ago
Or a cloaked ship?
gclawes•2h ago
EXCESSION
sixo•2h ago
If so it's a big one, 1M solar masses.
layer8•2h ago
That’s just how warp drives happen to appear from the outside.
preisschild•1h ago
... and its heading right for us :P
alansaber•2h ago
They found a statistical anomaly that they're trying to atrribute to new physics, using some novel maths. So a tiny speck of evidence towards a new theory of matter (i know nothing about astro, just my supposition)
momoschili•2h ago
Dark in the context of astrophysics means specifically that the object/matter does not interact directly with electromagnetic radiation (eg absorb an optical/microwave/radio photon). So it is probably dark matter, but probably unlikely to be a black hole because we can typically detect a black hole's effects in an indirect manner :P
bbor•2h ago
I'm an amateur but I feel confident enough to answer -- hopefully not a mistake!

They're explicitly looking for "Dark Matter", which doesn't "interact" with normal ("baryonic") matter or electromagnetic radiation (e.g. light). So it's not a black hole for sure, as those are composed of regular ol' matter.

RE:"dark star", that's really up in the air, I'd say! AFAICT the only academic reference to that term is for normal stars influenced by dark matter[1], but kinda the whole problem here is that we don't know much about what dark matter is composed of or into. Certainly it's not going to be a star in the traditional sense as it can't emit light, but I'm not aware of any reason this object can't end up being a giant sphere.

FWIW, Wikipedia says "One of the most massive stars known is Eta Carinae, with 100–200 [solar masses]", whereas this object "has a mass that is a million times greater than that of our Sun". If we're going to use metaphors, I think "dark dwarf galaxy" might be more appropriate?

[1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1004.1258

bongodongobob•2h ago
100-200 solar masses is not one of the largest known. There are many that are 1000s of times more massive than the sun.
shagie•2h ago
I'm unaware of any stars in the 1000 Msun range. Wikipedia puts 291 Msun of R136a1 at the largest. After that, 195 M of R136a2 is the next. A star at 100 Msun would be in the most massive stars known.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_massive_stars#Lis...

baconbrand•1h ago
This confused me too from all those solar object size comparisons I’ve seen. Turns out there are stars that are 1000s of times bigger than the sun, but they aren’t the same density.
t8sr•2h ago
(I’m an astrophysics undergrad.) Black holes aren’t composed of anything, they’re just defined by their charge, spin and mass equivalent.

Dust clouds have those mass ranges. It’s not a galaxy-scale mass by any measure.

This thread has a lot of CS people being confident about physics.

evanb•2h ago
I was always surprised that when we talk about BHs mass, charge, and spin that we really mean U(1) (electromagnetic) gauge charge and not charges from global symmetries. (If BHs had global charge, you could at least say that this or that black hole was made out of N baryons, or whatever.)

But it's really so---according to GR, black holes don't have global charges. So even if you see a star made out of baryons collapse into a black hole, once the BH settles down into a steady state you can't say it's "really" got baryons inside: the baryon number gets destroyed.

(Of course, a different model of gravity that preserves unitarity might upset this understanding.)

daxfohl•1h ago
And that a BH made from matter and one made from antimatter are mathematically identical, and merging them would not cause any explosion.
tremon•2h ago
which doesn't "interact" with normal ("baryonic") matter

I think you mean it doesn't interact electromagnetically with either matter or radiation. It does interact with normal matter via gravity -- that's pretty much the strongest (only?) argument for its existence.

I'm not aware of any reason this object can't end up being a giant sphere

AIUI, most theories posit that solid spheres of dark matter are very unlikely because matter accretion is governed by electromagnetism in addition to gravity, and dark matter is not supposed to obey the former. Most models assume that dark matter is organized in gaseous clouds (halos); strictly speaking that's still a giant sphere, just not in the same way that Jupiter or the Sun or even the Oort Cloud is.

t8sr•2h ago
Definitionally, yes. It’s inert but lenses light around it.

The paper is more about the technical achievement of detecting it, IIUC. It’s not the first dark matter inference we’ve had, and doesn’t really tell us anything new about the stuff.

daxfohl•1h ago
It challenges warm dark matter and ultralight dark matter theories because they'd be less likely to clump into something so small. Similarly MOND would have trouble explaining a completely isolated chunk of it at this size (any baryonic matter trapped in a region this small would almost certainly emit enough light to detect).
burnerRhodov2•2h ago
In this context, “dark object” really does mean a localized blob of dark matter, not a black hole or a dim, normal-matter object.

The research team detected it only through its gravitational lensing effect — the way it slightly distorted the light from a more distant galaxy. There’s no emission at any wavelength (optical, infrared, or radio), and its gravitational signature matches a million-solar-mass clump of invisible mass rather than a compact point source like a black hole.

They specifically interpret it as a dark matter subhalo — one of the small, dense lumps that simulations of “cold dark matter” predict should pepper the universe’s larger halos. It’s too massive to be a single star, far too diffuse to be a stellar remnant, and not luminous enough to be a faint galaxy.

So “dark” here isn’t just shorthand for “too dim to see at this distance” — it’s used in the literal physical sense: matter that doesn’t emit or absorb light at all, detectable only via gravity.

Eventually, all the dark matter clumps into rings around galaxies, but since this one is so distant, ~10B light years, so we are seeing that clump as it was that long ago before it difused into it's ring shape we can see in the galaxies around us.

layer8•2h ago
From the paper, it could be the dark-matter halo of an otherwise too faint dwarf galaxy. They state that a “more definitive statement on what type of object [it] is will require deep optical/infrared observations to detect any potential EM emission”.
tiffanyh•2h ago
Related: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45538113
layer8•2h ago
Actual paper: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-025-02651-2

From the abstract: “This is the lowest-mass object known to us, by two orders of magnitude, to be detected at a cosmological distance by its gravitational effect. This work demonstrates the observational feasibility of using gravitational imaging to probe the million-solar-mass regime far beyond our local Universe.”

blamestross•1h ago
And when you are trying out a new imaging method, the selection bias for "long tail weird stuff" that shows up is pretty high.

Assuming this is repeatable, it will take a while to contextualize.

geniium•1h ago
Probably a small bug in the matrix
deadbabe•1h ago
It’s nothing, mostly empty space.
baconbrand•1h ago
I have nothing but admiration for people who can study space and not melt down into a permanent existential crisis.

This is cool as heck, and now I’m going to go back to my computer job and try not to think about how ridiculously tiny and fragile my little life is.

HPsquared•1h ago
Conversely, people who study microscopic phenomena might end up with gigantic inflated egos. "Lord of the atoms"
dgfl•46m ago
It’s our job. It’s mundane. It’s only cool again when you step back for these kind of publications, or when you go to a conference and you see a bunch of adjacent (and importantly, completed) work. 99% of the time we look at a screen / piece of paper / whiteboard.
somenameforme•1h ago
Another fun one. The Cosmic Calendar. [1] Imagine breaking down the history of the universe into a single year. It really offers some amazing perspective on the length of life, and what it means.

[1] - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ln8UwPd1z20

VTimofeenko•1h ago
I wonder if it's similar to how mefical doctors feel about their jobs. It's gotta turn into a bit of a routine, otherwise they will just spend time in that existential crisis and not get anything done.

> This is cool as heck, and now I’m going to go back to my computer job and try not to think about how ridiculously tiny and fragile my little life is.

There could be an alternative take here: we really lucked out that life as we know it exists at all. So we kinda won the lottery already.

gigatexal•27m ago
Same. As soon as I really let myself consider how vast, empty, desolate empty space is and then imagine myself floating in it with no reference and unable to tell if I am up or down or going anywhere ... I get all sorts of dread.

That being said... I'd love to if I were terminally ill yet capable enough to understand what was happening -- to be yeeted into a super super massive blackhole that was not feeding such that I would not be torn to shreds or vaporized by the accretion disk and ultimately understand what lies at the center of my now time horizon...

butlike•20m ago
You're in good company with the atoms in your fingernail, I'm sure :)
WaxProlix•5m ago
Tidal forces would still shred and disfigured you horrifically well before the event horizon. The term is literally 'spagghetification'
pseudosavant•2m ago
Same. The scales that the universe operates on (distance, time, mass/energy, etc) make the human experience so infinitely small as to be nearly nothing. Yet, here we are. Pondering our own existence.
hearsathought•1h ago
Not a "distant universe" but our universe distant in time ( aka our universe in the past when it was younger ).

The title reads like astronomers found a mysterious dark object in another universe. Like a distant solar system or a distant galaxy.

Or am I misunderstanding the findings here?

aethrum•1h ago
no it doesn't

Zorin OS 18 eyes your Windows 10 PC as Microsoft pulls the plug

https://www.neowin.net/news/zorin-os-18-eyes-your-windows-10-pc-as-microsoft-pulls-the-plug/
1•bundie•1m ago•0 comments

Declarative Agentic Framework

https://not7.ai/
1•gnanagurusrgs•1m ago•1 comments

FCFZ: Compatible Flipper Zero

https://www.hackster.io/zst123/fcfz-fully-compatible-flipper-zero-e686ba
1•walterbell•5m ago•0 comments

YouTube's creator economy is about to collapse (AI replacement fact not theory)

https://old.reddit.com/r/content_marketing/comments/1o5jzcs/youtubes_entire_creator_economy_is_ab...
2•dakial1•8m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Lockbridge – Encrypted File Transfers

1•audreymplatta1•9m ago•0 comments

Show HN: OneUptime – Open-Source Incident.io

https://github.com/OneUptime/oneuptime
1•ndhandala•9m ago•0 comments

Are your users paying the price for your Shiny New Feature syndrome?

https://littlelanguagemodels.com/shiny-new-feature-syndrome-content-audit-reputation-problem/
1•mooreds•11m ago•0 comments

Venture Global's Gas Plant Is Done

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/newsletters/2025-10-14/venture-global-s-gas-plant-is-done
2•ioblomov•12m ago•1 comments

MG5 electric car became dangerously out of control

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2025/oct/14/mg-mg5-electric-car-safety-check
2•worik•13m ago•0 comments

An interactive table with the religious composition in 201 countries

https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/feature/religious-composition-by-country-2010-2020/
1•alphabetatango•14m ago•0 comments

What do Americans die from vs. what the news report on

https://ourworldindata.org/does-the-news-reflect-what-we-die-from
5•alphabetatango•17m ago•0 comments

Trump administration canceled the nation's largest solar project

https://www.cnn.com/2025/10/14/climate/trump-solar-project-nevada-electricity
1•thelastgallon•18m ago•0 comments

Chinese autonomous driving firm WeRide taps banks for Hong Kong listing

https://www.reuters.com/world/china/chinese-autonomous-driving-firm-weride-taps-banks-hong-kong-l...
1•Anumbia•18m ago•0 comments

Bypassing CAPTCHAs from ARM64 Linux GitHub Actions jobs to collect Copilot data [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPQ3GZz1AtM
2•mintzworld•19m ago•0 comments

The OS/2 Display Driver Zoo

https://www.os2museum.com/wp/the-os-2-display-driver-zoo/
2•kencausey•21m ago•0 comments

Russia Steps Up Assault on Antiwar Exiles, Accusing Them of Terrorism

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/14/world/europe/russia-antiwar-ukraine-terrorism.html
4•JumpCrisscross•24m ago•1 comments

Intel Announces Inference-Optimized Xe3P Graphics Card with 160GB VRAM

https://www.phoronix.com/review/intel-crescent-island
6•wrigby•26m ago•1 comments

Researchers Discover the Optimal Way to Optimize

https://www.quantamagazine.org/researchers-discover-the-optimal-way-to-optimize-20251013/
1•pykello•27m ago•0 comments

CMU Students Put AI Coding Tools to the Test

https://www.cs.cmu.edu/news/2025/ai-tools-for-software
2•azhenley•28m ago•0 comments

Qwen3-VL-4B and 8B runs locally on NPU, GPU, and CPU with one SDK

https://nexa.ai/blogs/qwen3vl
2•alanzhuly•28m ago•0 comments

Hypernetworks: Neural Networks for Hierarchical Data

https://blog.sturdystatistics.com/posts/hnet_part_I/
1•kianN•29m ago•0 comments

JEP Draft: Strict Field Initialization in the JVM

https://openjdk.org/jeps/8350458
1•mfiguiere•30m ago•0 comments

Why your boss isn't worried about AI – "can't you just turn it off?"

https://boydkane.com/essays/boss
2•beyarkay•31m ago•0 comments

Users are downgrading from macOS 26

https://telemetrydeck.com/survey/apple/macOS/versions/
4•outcoldman•32m ago•1 comments

Python 3.15 will include a new sampling profiler

https://docs.python.org/3.15/whatsnew/3.15.html#pep-799-high-frequency-statistical-sampling-profiler
1•nicolasp•33m ago•1 comments

New lab-grown human embryo model produces blood cells

https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/new-lab-grown-human-embryo-model-produces-blood-cells
24•gmays•35m ago•5 comments

Is it time for TPC-BLOB?

http://smalldatum.blogspot.com/2025/10/is-it-time-for-tpc-blob.html
1•karsinkk•35m ago•0 comments

Young Republicans brag about their racism

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/10/14/private-chat-among-young-gop-club-members-00592146
20•Avshalom•35m ago•2 comments

Optimizing writes to OLAP using buffers (ClickHouse, Redpanda, MooseStack)

https://www.fiveonefour.com/blog/optimizing-writes-to-olap-using-buffers
3•oatsandsugar•36m ago•1 comments

OpenAI forms expert council to bolster safety measures after FTC inquiry

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/10/14/open-ai-expert-council-safety-ftc.html
3•thm•36m ago•1 comments