I can go on, it's not hard to find.
America used to be the model for progressively dealing with racism. No more.
Is detaining citizens with probable cause illegal?
Given the violence and threats made against ICE employees, is wearing a mask not a reasonable response? Is the wearing of masks by law enforcement personnel illegal?
> “jackbooted thugs”
What does this even mean? Seriously. What is a jackboot? Why are you saying they wear them? To what imagery are you trying to allude?
You’ve yet to identify any illegality so far as I can tell.
SCOTUS explicitly permitted it in Noem v. Perdomo.
ICE also claims they don’t need probable cause. Here’s a video of Tom Homan proving both points: https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3ltoyyfr5vt2m
Wearing a mask is not a reasonable response. And what violence and threats are you referring to? In Chicago people were dancing and wearing silly suits to protest them.
In terms of what a jackboot is, Google is your friend and you have a non-existent grasp of history if you have no idea what this means. Try also looking up "brown shirts".
My media feeds are showing protesters that are too aggressive, drawing legal responses from ICE. Show what you’re seeing, please.
I have seen footage of ICE agents shooting up cars and smashing windows.
Maybe you should show what you are seeing, because the subway sandwich guy in a chicken suit that Kristi Noem was looking at from a rooftop the other day didn’t look very dangerous or violent.
Which ones we pick to be super hardline about says much about us.
Won't the police think of my poor child if they take me away in handcuffs for my DUI? Such evil people.
But they aren't enforcing the law, they are often taking highly illegal actions. If you've been only listening to Fox News, you wouldn't know it otherwise. But it's well documented what they've been up to. And it has caused widespread misery and none of these agents are accountable.
I mean, you clearly don't want law enforcement to be accountable for their actions. That's quite the take you've got there.
No platform can be considered a useful and valid source of info if data about power structures is rendered unavailable as a routine matter.
The entire value prop of the internet as a human endeavor is in the "inter" part - connecting networks without regard to orthodox boundaries or power structures. An internet that yields to legacy state censorship is just a net.
I really need to take some time get into mastadon or lens or bluesky or whatever.
ceejayoz•4h ago
phendrenad2•4h ago
ajross•2h ago
But for the record, since consistent propriety is the subject of the subthread: as a left-leaning liberal, I hereby declare that I think coercing Twitter to remove content for political reasons is equally as bad as doing the same to Facebook.
[1] Not least because the entity doing the coercing was not the government, which was run by Biden's opponent.
Wowfunhappy•1h ago
For what's worth, I've actually changed my mind about this. I was originally fine with the government encouraging Twitter to take down pandemic related stuff, but after seeing what Trump has done... well, in hindsight, I think the Biden administration should have stayed out of Twitter moderation, just as the Trump administration should stay out of Facebook moderation.
I still think there is a difference in severity between what Biden did and what Trump is doing, but that's beside the point. The current administration has really demonstrated for me why free speech is so important. We should not compromise on that principle, even when it seems logical in the short term.
RickJWagner•1h ago
ceejayoz•48m ago
Facebook and Twitter not being allowed to ban the sitting President would be a major First Amendment violation, in fact.