frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Python Only Has One Real Competitor

https://mccue.dev/pages/2-6-26-python-competitor
1•dragandj•1m ago•0 comments

Tmux to Zellij (and Back)

https://www.mauriciopoppe.com/notes/tmux-to-zellij/
1•maurizzzio•2m ago•1 comments

Ask HN: How are you using specialized agents to accelerate your work?

1•otterley•3m ago•0 comments

Passing user_id through 6 services? OTel Baggage fixes this

https://signoz.io/blog/otel-baggage/
1•pranay01•4m ago•0 comments

DavMail Pop/IMAP/SMTP/Caldav/Carddav/LDAP Exchange Gateway

https://davmail.sourceforge.net/
1•todsacerdoti•4m ago•0 comments

Visual data modelling in the browser (open source)

https://github.com/sqlmodel/sqlmodel
1•Sean766•6m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Tharos – CLI to find and autofix security bugs using local LLMs

https://github.com/chinonsochikelue/tharos
1•fluantix•7m ago•0 comments

Oddly Simple GUI Programs

https://simonsafar.com/2024/win32_lights/
1•MaximilianEmel•7m ago•0 comments

The New Playbook for Leaders [pdf]

https://www.ibli.com/IBLI%20OnePagers%20The%20Plays%20Summarized.pdf
1•mooreds•8m ago•0 comments

Interactive Unboxing of J Dilla's Donuts

https://donuts20.vercel.app
1•sngahane•9m ago•0 comments

OneCourt helps blind and low-vision fans to track Super Bowl live

https://www.dezeen.com/2026/02/06/onecourt-tactile-device-super-bowl-blind-low-vision-fans/
1•gaws•11m ago•0 comments

Rudolf Vrba

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Vrba
1•mooreds•11m ago•0 comments

Autism Incidence in Girls and Boys May Be Nearly Equal, Study Suggests

https://www.medpagetoday.com/neurology/autism/119747
1•paulpauper•12m ago•0 comments

Wellness Hotels Discovery Application

https://aurio.place/
1•cherrylinedev•13m ago•1 comments

NASA delays moon rocket launch by a month after fuel leaks during test

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2026/feb/03/nasa-delays-moon-rocket-launch-month-fuel-leaks-a...
1•mooreds•14m ago•0 comments

Sebastian Galiani on the Marginal Revolution

https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2026/02/sebastian-galiani-on-the-marginal-revol...
2•paulpauper•17m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: Are we at the point where software can improve itself?

1•ManuelKiessling•17m ago•0 comments

Binance Gives Trump Family's Crypto Firm a Leg Up

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/07/business/binance-trump-crypto.html
1•paulpauper•17m ago•0 comments

Reverse engineering Chinese 'shit-program' for absolute glory: R/ClaudeCode

https://old.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1qy5l0n/reverse_engineering_chinese_shitprogram_for/
1•edward•17m ago•0 comments

Indian Culture

https://indianculture.gov.in/
1•saikatsg•20m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Maravel-Framework 10.61 prevents circular dependency

https://marius-ciclistu.medium.com/maravel-framework-10-61-0-prevents-circular-dependency-cdb5d25...
1•marius-ciclistu•20m ago•0 comments

The age of a treacherous, falling dollar

https://www.economist.com/leaders/2026/02/05/the-age-of-a-treacherous-falling-dollar
2•stopbulying•21m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: AI Generated Diagrams

1•voidhorse•23m ago•0 comments

Microsoft Account bugs locked me out of Notepad – are Thin Clients ruining PCs?

https://www.windowscentral.com/microsoft/windows-11/windows-locked-me-out-of-notepad-is-the-thin-...
5•josephcsible•24m ago•1 comments

Show HN: A delightful Mac app to vibe code beautiful iOS apps

https://milq.ai/hacker-news
6•jdjuwadi•26m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Gemini Station – A local Chrome extension to organize AI chats

https://github.com/rajeshkumarblr/gemini_station
1•rajeshkumar_dev•27m ago•0 comments

Welfare states build financial markets through social policy design

https://theloop.ecpr.eu/its-not-finance-its-your-pensions/
2•kome•30m ago•0 comments

Market orientation and national homicide rates

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1745-9125.70023
4•PaulHoule•31m ago•0 comments

California urges people avoid wild mushrooms after 4 deaths, 3 liver transplants

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/california-death-cap-mushrooms-poisonings-liver-transplants/
1•rolph•31m ago•0 comments

Matthew Shulman, co-creator of Intellisense, died 2019 March 22

https://www.capenews.net/falmouth/obituaries/matthew-a-shulman/article_33af6330-4f52-5f69-a9ff-58...
3•canucker2016•32m ago•1 comments
Open in hackernews

Meta convinces Blue Owl to cut $30B check for its Hyperion AI super cluster

https://www.theregister.com/2025/10/17/meta_blue_owl_hyperion/
41•rntn•3mo ago

Comments

master_crab•3mo ago
Would love to see the business plan that convinced Blue Owl to sink that much money.

Or maybe they’re ok with the collateral on offer.

sottol•3mo ago
$30B ... 2GW datacenter ... ??? ... AGI
mlnj•3mo ago
Everyone is very silent on AGI in the past months.

The latest from AI is better targeted ads and better adult content didn't you hear?

temp0826•3mo ago
If I was going to start a shitcoin scam I'd call it AGI
erichocean•3mo ago
I don't know about AGI, but AI employees replacing human labor is well within range today.
mlnj•3mo ago
Excel sheets have replaced many humans too. Pretty low bar for AGI if you'd ask me.
erichocean•3mo ago
Not replaced, made more efficient—the "replacement" is indirect.

Actual replacement involves no human in the loop, an entire firm that is 100% AI labor is possible.

Mountain_Skies•3mo ago
Too much money chasing too few investment opportunities with large potential returns. Risk really isn't being acknowledged these days.
Fade_Dance•3mo ago
The way the recent deals have been structured is that the capacity and thus revenue is pre-booked, which upgrades the credit quality in the eyes of the lenders. Blue Owl is private equity, so they are likely loading the special purpose vehicle itself with the debt (in a way that it off Meta's balance sheet, which is the primary objective), and then possibly funding the capital outlay through secondary markets (if not now, then perhaps later they can bundle it up and sell it - it's Meta adjacent so they will have no problem selling on that debt).

If Blue Owl is providing capital for an equity slice, they get huge leverage on their cut baked into the deal. Pension funds that may end up buying debt in the deal eventually don't want to actually fund the equity of the project and take the risk booting it all up while sitting at the front of the capital stack with corresponding risk of getting wiped out (even if it's a Meta partnership), they simply want securitized fixed income, and make it as vanilla as possible.

So the question is more "will Private Credit (or pension funds/institutions) take debt backed by datacenter collateral with long term service agreements with Meta" and the answer is yes. There is much lower quality stuff than that in the PC space.

master_crab•3mo ago
This makes a lot of sense.

But the one thing that doesn’t compute is the commitment. There is a long term obligation now incurred by meta to use this infrastructure. If it’s a capital lease I assume this is now a liability on their books (and disclosures)?

Fade_Dance•3mo ago
This seems to be a widespread practice lately, so there must be something going on here. Aside from the balance sheet/accounting angle...

Maybe they don't want to securitize their core assets and introduce a new favored class of investor. Ex: If they are securitizing their AI data centers as part of the initial capital raise, those investors would be higher up the capital stack. They would get the datacenter in a theoretical bankruptcy before the bond/equity holders got their cut of the liquidation. Intel securitized their new fab builds with Brookfield and Apollo and, as a shareholder at the time, it didn't feel great. No idea what the precedent is regarding Meta by the way, just a thought.

Maybe they think that the lenders are a bit "overzealous", and they want to push the risk of things like write down on GPU racks entirely onto external parties who are apparently all too happy to take the risk.

I'm guessing it's a mix of both, combined with the fact that we're seeing some copy and paste thinking. This is proving to be a way to get fast access to the huge private credit market. I would assume there must be some very wide deal flow pipes cranking currently, so why not tap into them if the demand is there in the other end.

Ekaros•3mo ago
Debt financed. Who is loaning money to these things? I feel there must be an other level of bubble there...
trollbridge•3mo ago
It’s private money, like if you went and asked your uncle for a loan.
prepend•3mo ago
Seems like a stable investment with returns locked in through 2049 unless Facebook defaults.
Ekaros•3mo ago
2049... 20 years. So what exactly is being funded? Just the infra? Walls, power grid, cooling, security cameras and such. Or is any part of this the servers? Is there need for more money in say 2039?
williadc•3mo ago
They probably used some of the money for this: https://www.nextplatform.com/2025/10/02/meta-buys-rivos-to-a...
BolexNOLA•3mo ago
Maybe I’m off the mark here but considering the state Facebook was in until AI put some wind back in its sales I would not say 20 years is a safe bet.

Remember how much time and money they burned on Metaverse? They’ve got nothing to show for it. And wasn’t only like 1-2 years ago they stopped publishing DAU’s in favor of a more favorable metric?

Someone feel free to correct me but they seemed to be just dipping their toes into a bit of a house of cards situation just a couple of years ago.

mcoliver•3mo ago
Hence the big push currently ongoing to allow 401ks to invest in private markets
victorbjorklund•3mo ago
Wouldnt that be pocket change?
googlywoogly•3mo ago
The exact value of all 401k isn't really known, but the average account value is estimated at ~135k, if (let's say) 200 million Americans have a 401k, that comes out to 27 trillion.
FanaHOVA•3mo ago
You really think the amount of savings in 401ks is the same size as the GDP of the whole country?
dmoy•3mo ago
It's not, but IRA plus 401k is about equal to GDP, yes (and if you add approximately equivalent defined contribution plans like 403b, tsp, etc, then it's more than GDP)
consumer451•3mo ago
> It's not, but IRA plus 401k is about equal to GDP

The economic vampires must salivate about this opportunity all night and day.

hollerith•3mo ago
That's comparing a rate of flow to a static amount. In other words, GDP is 27 trillion per year.
rsynnott•3mo ago
Why shouldn't it be? GDP is _economic production (for some value of economic production) for a year_. It's not all that closely linked to wealth.
dmoy•3mo ago
> isn't really known

It's mostly known, but you're probably right it's not exactly known

45 trillion across all retirement accounts, 12 trillion in defined contribution (including 401k), 9 trillion in just 401k

https://www.ici.org/statistical-report/ret_25_q2

In that chart, the 18T of IRA has portion in private equity, and the 15T of pension (defined benefit) has a portion in private equity. The 13T defined contribution plans (of which the vast majority is 401k) can't be placed in private equity right now.

victorbjorklund•3mo ago
Yeah, but I don't think anybody is expecting every single American to take out 100% of their savings from the stock market and put them in private equity.
pcurve•3mo ago
This article doesn't mention it, but PIMCO is lead lender

"Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO) is the anchor lender on the deal. The debt, which matures in 2049, is fully amortising and has been rated A+ by S&P. The bonds were priced at around 225 basis points over U.S. Treasuries."

https://pe-insights.com/blue-owl-and-meta-close-record-30bn-...

Oof.. I don't know about this one.

lazide•3mo ago
Pimco - the company that originated all those bonds every pension fund is sitting on.
consumer451•3mo ago
I am 99.0% percent sure that the AI bubble burst is coming. I was only 95% sure until very recently.

Does this mean that this investment spreads the bubble burst risk into people's pension funds? (those lucky enough to have such a thing) Or, not necessarily?

Ekaros•3mo ago
I would think so. I don't think pension funds are always exactly smart money. They have lot of pressure to make numbers work so they are after anything that sounds reasonably like it will make them work. And that can work until it does not.
lazide•3mo ago
Pension funds, banks, etc, are never smart money. They aren’t allowed to be.

They are required to pick based on some defined formula which the various stakeholders signed off on, and hence are prime juicy targets for people trying to game systems.

They also took the ‘08 mortgage crisis right in the shorts, for the same reasons.

nradov•3mo ago
This is why all defined benefit pension funds should be eliminated and replaced with defined contribution plans. Pensions are far too systemically risky for employees, employers, and taxpayers alike. The only one who really benefits are the fund managers who get to collect large fees.
lazide•3mo ago
And banks?
consumer451•3mo ago
Reading the replies, my next question is: How much of say, CALPERS [0], is invested in "AGI by next 2030" or similar. If it's far less than 1%, that seems like a fair bet. Does anyone have a good read on the real number?

[0] https://www.calpers.ca.gov/

andrewinardeer•3mo ago
Knowing that an AI bubble bust is coming is not magic.

Knowing when it will burst is.

rsynnott•3mo ago
Oh, we're doing this again, are we?

Ugh. A year ago, I was (a) fairly confident that the AI bubble would burst, but (b) fairly confident that contagion would be limited; a bunch of startups would evaporate, and some VCs would be badly burned or fail, but the broader economy would largely shrug and carry on.

Based on this sort of thing, I'm not sure I still believe (b).

pcurve•3mo ago
What I find fascinating is, everyone is making the same exact points:

1. Yes, there is a bubble, but it's not the same. Companies are profitable.

2. It may burst, but this may go on for another 2+ years. No one knows.

3. Even after the burst, we would have valuable AI infrastructure, just like all the excess internet capacities after the Dotcom.

Base on this, I think the bubble will burst sooner. Sentiment can shift real quick.

chiph•3mo ago
Is there enough power in the nearby parishes to supply 2.2GW? Also - will there be enough skilled labor?
perihelions•3mo ago
> "As we learned in December, Meta has commissioned a new natural gas generator plant to be built by local utility operator Entergy. At least for the initial build out, the gas plant would employ three combined cycle combustion turbine generators with a total generative capacity of over 2.2 gigawatts."
fishmicrowaver•3mo ago
Nope, they're not betting on connecting to the grid. They're going to burn natural gas / shale oil.
alchemist1e9•3mo ago
Are the design specifications, like interconnect, GPUs, CPUs, memory and storage of this new cluster public? I seem to recall xAI has made public theirs. I’m mostly asking out of curiosity and a desire to read up on the SOTA hardware specs being used. EDIT: this has some interesting details — https://www.adwaitx.com/meta-prometheus-ai-cluster/

I assume eventually all this investment should result in price drops for cloud GPU rates. Maybe somebody has setup an automated rate aggregator and collected the data? It would be interesting to see the historical data and monitor the changes, like dollars per TFLOP/hr or something standardized to track over time like other economic data or prices. EDIT: this is along the lines and pretty interesting — https://www.unitedcompute.ai/gpu-price-tracker

I know I’m mixing two different thoughts but they are connected in my head for entrepreneurs interested in starting independent tech/AI/LLM businesses needing heavy compute infrastructure.

nextworddev•3mo ago
It’s complicated.

Old GPUs (ex hopper, A100) prices has been dropping but the new ones will go up.. so yes it doesn’t need to crash for you to have cheaper gpus

1123581321•3mo ago
A little more detail in the linked Bloomberg report. https://archive.ph/2025.10.18-043843/https://www.bloomberg.c...
dom96•3mo ago
Meta has plenty of money, why do they need private equity to fund this?
consumer451•3mo ago
Isn't the first rule of business that you spend other people's money, whenever possible?
onlyrealcuzzo•3mo ago
Another #1 is to get a good return on your money.

But tech companies horde cash because they don't have anywhere they see as a good investment.

You'd think investing in their own data centers would get a better return than cash.

Kind of makes you wonder why everyone is so eager to fund these projects for them.

nextworddev•3mo ago
Because that’s the only place with growth
consumer451•3mo ago
Sometimes the simplest point makes the most sense about a complex topic.

Kudos for being very succinct. I believe the youths would have just replied: "this." :~>

aorloff•3mo ago
Theoretically, tech companies valuations are based on the notion that the best place for them to invest money is internally, that their internal flywheel is the absolute highest return on capital.

Practically speaking, they also need to build data centers, and real estate has more pedestrian (returns and) valuations, even when it houses fantastical uber tech.

consumer451•3mo ago
Good points, but after processing other replies in this post, I would change the last sentence to:

Is Meta so unsure about this investment, that they decided to spread the risk and profit to other parties, even though they could fund it themselves?

(AI bubble death knell ?)

grugagag•3mo ago
Dump risk on others
Ekaros•3mo ago
Make the numbers look better? There must be benefits of moving these numbers from column to some other column. Or even partially hiding them. Thus allowing stock to be priced higher based on some metric...
halayli•3mo ago
if you have $100M and you need a $1M, you'd use your credit line and borrow $1M and pay it back from interests coming from $100M. it's not that different in corp.
jstanley•3mo ago
That doesn't make any sense.

You'll be paying a higher rate of interest on your loan than you're receiving on your cash.

You'd be better off taking the $1m directly out of your cash pile.

binarymax•3mo ago
Not necessarily. You can get an interest rate lower than your investment return rate.
YokoZar•3mo ago
When interest rates were particularly low years ago, we saw a large number of companies issuing bonds and then using the money to just do stock buybacks.
_heimdall•3mo ago
That depends heavily on the terms of the loan you can secure and how you choose to invest the cash.

When you borrow $1M against $100M in cash or assets its generally considered a very low risk loan, meaning you'll likely get good terms and comparatively low rates.

halayli•3mo ago
You need to consider secured line of credit vs unsecured and the interest rate is significantly different as one is backed by collateral and the other is not.
SoftTalker•3mo ago
> structured in such a way as to keep the debt off of the Social Network's balance sheets
nradov•3mo ago
The article is poorly written. This deal is mostly debt financing with only a little bit of equity.

In terms of corporate capital structure, shareholder returns are usually maximized by taking on at least some debt (leverage). The precise optimal proportion of debt depends on several factors, particularly credit rating.

nickpsecurity•3mo ago
People wanted massive investments in the electric grid. Thanks to AI boom, that's finally happening. Except, they're also going to be massively using the electric grid.

Maybe we'll be blessed by AI companies making money but staying under usage projections. Then, those areas have more power.

boulos•3mo ago
The Bloomberg source is more informative with respect to the financing (https://archive.ph/5WGcA)

> Blue Owl Capital Inc. and Meta will split ownership of the Hyperion data center site in Richland Parish, Louisiana, with the tech giant retaining just 20% of it, according to people with knowledge of the matter. To finance the build-out, Morgan Stanley arranged over $27 billion of debt and about $2.5 billion of equity into a special purpose vehicle

At 225 over (current?) treasuries:

> The bonds priced at about 225 basis points over Treasuries,

BolexNOLA•3mo ago
The sums being thrown around right now are just staggering. All the money that is being leveraged for AI these days is going to absolutely crush some unlucky sods somewhere. All these massive deals can’t all succeed.

Louisiana residents better expect higher energy costs soon as well that’s for sure. No way entergy is content eating the costs of these investments and the state basically has an allergy to taxing or in any way financially inconveniencing companies.

The way things typically go in LA the only guarantee is the residents will be on the losing end in some form or fashion (also many politicians are probably skimming off plenty for themselves and their buddies). Especially with Landry at the helm.

neilv•3mo ago
If it doesn't pay off, and becomes just a warehouse space with outdated computers in a few years, who takes the financial hit?

(Meta? Blue Owl Capital's institutional investors? Blue Owl Capital's private investors?)

neilv•3mo ago
If this data center in Richland Parish, Louisiana, is full of obsolete hardware in a few years, do they just wait for the next hurricane, open all the doors and windows, and phone the insurance company with the bad news?