frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

The Seven Archetypes of Founders and CEOs

https://blog.curtisduggan.com/posts/the-seven-archetypes-of-founders-and-ceos
1•wayviator•4m ago•0 comments

Improving math skill of students by classification tasks

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01053.x
1•lackoftactics•7m ago•0 comments

The roots of Islamic anger (2001-10-14)

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/oct/14/terrorism.afghanistan12
1•thomassmith65•10m ago•0 comments

Better GPS Precision, Smartwatches

https://techxplore.com/news/2025-10-smartwatches-centimeter-accuracy-tracking-algorithms.html
1•DaveZale•12m ago•0 comments

First Ford, Now Jeep. Automakers Are Hit by Lack of Parts

https://www.wsj.com/business/autos/car-industry-supply-chain-issues-218b19b9
1•zerosizedweasle•14m ago•0 comments

Marine park threatens to euthanize 30 whales if Canada does not provide funding

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/oct/06/canada-marineland-beluga-whales
2•geox•16m ago•2 comments

The Latest Controversy in Chess Is the Cupcake Gambit

https://www.wsj.com/sports/hikaru-nakamura-chess-1b43be0e
1•voisin•20m ago•0 comments

Karryon Air New Zealand's first electric aircraft trial in NZ lift-off

https://karryon.com.au/industry-news/airline/air-new-zealand-electric-jet/
1•protik49•20m ago•0 comments

Replua.nvim – an Emacs-style scratch buffer for executing Lua

https://github.com/mghaight/replua.nvim
1•mghaig•21m ago•0 comments

A Definition of AGI [pdf]

https://www.agidefinition.ai/paper.pdf
1•coffeeaddict1•21m ago•0 comments

Building a roadmp in a vacuum – the case of the late mover

https://world.hey.com/cdecatheu/jeamlit-diary-00-building-a-roadmap-as-a-late-mover-32be2b52
1•cyrilou242•23m ago•0 comments

Apple employees concerned about new Siri

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2025-10-19/apple-m5-ipad-pro-vision-pro-macbook-pro-im...
4•danielsht•26m ago•0 comments

Generalized K-Means Clustering for Apache Spark with Bregman Divergences

https://github.com/derrickburns/generalized-kmeans-clustering
1•derrickrburns•27m ago•1 comments

Using Emacs as a TUI

https://blog.natfu.be/emacs-in-terminal-ergonomics/
1•NeutralForest•28m ago•0 comments

Tell HN: Opportunity to build NCLEX prep that teaches, not just tests

1•johnnyApplePRNG•28m ago•0 comments

US-China dispute over chipmaker could halt car production, send prices higher

https://www.cnn.com/2025/10/19/business/nexperia-us-china-car-prices
2•zerosizedweasle•29m ago•0 comments

Context Parameters and API Design

https://serranofp.com/blog/context-params.html
1•todsacerdoti•31m ago•0 comments

The Imminent Solar Conjunction of 3I/Atlas

https://avi-loeb.medium.com/the-imminent-solar-conjunction-of-3i-atlas-264a6ccd441c
2•grekowalski•31m ago•0 comments

First Brands' Blowup Puts Trade Finance in Spotlight

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2025-10-19/first-brands-blowup-puts-trade-finance-in-s...
1•petethomas•37m ago•0 comments

Entropy in Compression (2013)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5c_RFKVkko
3•todsacerdoti•39m ago•0 comments

A blogger theme inspired from Apple Notes?

https://github.com/muddassirhq/apple-notes-blogger-theme
1•muddassirhq•40m ago•1 comments

Did I get a little bit hacked by ChatGPT here?

https://quickchat.ai/post/did-i-get-hacked-by-chatgpt
2•piotrgrudzien•41m ago•0 comments

Matthew Walker's "Why We Sleep" Is Riddled with Scientific and Factual Errors

https://guzey.com/books/why-we-sleep/
2•doener•43m ago•0 comments

My first product launch – BuyerIQ

https://www.buyeriq.io/
1•VladShumov•43m ago•1 comments

Swiss Bank Sygnum Unveils Bitcoin Yield Fund as BTC DeFi Demand Grows

https://www.coindesk.com/business/2025/10/01/swiss-bank-sygnum-unveils-bitcoin-yield-fund-as-btc-...
2•PaulHoule•44m ago•1 comments

Pixel 10 Ask Photos skips Texas and Illinois with no reason

https://www.houstonchronicle.com/business/article/pixel-10-ask-photos-texas-illinois-21101011.php
1•reaperducer•45m ago•0 comments

Gleam OTP – Fault Tolerant Multicore Programs with Actors

https://github.com/gleam-lang/otp
2•TheWiggles•45m ago•0 comments

Man Builds a Self-Sufficient Floating Bamboo Island [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etdb8-v2enI
1•doener•46m ago•0 comments

Setting up Binder for the Future [pdf]

https://lpc.events/event/17/contributions/1427/attachments/1177/2423/rust_binder_plumbers2023.pdf
2•weinzierl•46m ago•0 comments

Best 'mega-airports' in North America for reliability,TSA efficiency and more

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/10/19/msp-jfk-sfo-10-best-mega-airports-in-north-america-2025.html
1•pm2222•47m ago•1 comments
Open in hackernews

Novo Nordisk's Canadian Mistake

https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/novo-nordisk-s-canadian-mistake
149•jbm•2h ago

Comments

paulpauper•1h ago
So would it be possible to buy the drug in Canada and ship to US?
jasongill•1h ago
not legally, but anything is possible
OutOfHere•1h ago
There is nothing illegal about it. People get medicines from abroad all the time that are not generic domestically. It's not a controlled substance. One might have to go through unofficial channels though. In fact, I know people domestically who already get it cheaply from elsewhere abroad.
js2•1h ago
> In most circumstances, it is illegal for individuals to import drugs or devices into the U.S. for personal use because these products purchased from other countries often have not been approved by the FDA for use and sale in the U.S.

https://www.fda.gov/industry/import-basics/personal-importat...

rootusrootus•1h ago
I think you may need to drive it across, not ship it, and the quantity limit is a 90 day supply. For people who live close enough to the border, it might be worth it.
Hilift•1h ago
Possible, but considering that US Ozempic revenue is $10 billion per year between only Medicaid and Medicare, that would attract customs attention. The US market was projected to increase to $58 billion by 2035.
dlcarrier•38m ago
Smuggling aside, they generally won't make it through customs: https://www.help.cbp.gov/s/article/Article-1815?language=en_...
pedalpete•1h ago
I thought I had a decent handle on patent law, but maybe I'm missing something here.

Yes, the patent won't be valid for Canada, but you can't import a product into the US which would infringe on a US patent.

So, though there may be a small amount that would slip through the cracks, it isn't as if anyone in the US can now manufacture Semaglutide and distribute it.

Canada is such a small market, that many companies don't bother. Though, for the cost, it seems ridiculous a company as big as Novo didn't pay the $500...that may even have been in Canadian dollars. :)

rootusrootus•1h ago
As Derek mentions, Canada is the second largest market. There may be a lot coming into the US already, legal or not.
maximus_01•1h ago
Not that small. High income and roughly the same population as California, which isn't too small for companies to bother selling into.

Ozempic did about US$2bn of revenue in 2024 in Canada.

killingtime74•1h ago
Don't worry about the law think about the practical impact. It's now completely legal to ignore the patent in Canada so the price in Canada will plummet.

Canadian pharmacies can legally sell it and Americans (and all other foreigners for that matter) traveling there can legally buy it.

Unlike the criminal law, Novo nordisk would have to go after every single person individually and make the case that they are infringing the American patent. This is all without the help of the police or customs, as a private civil matter.

Obviously this would be uneconomic for Novo Nordisk. You can't search anyone as you don't have any warrants, as it's not a crime and then even if you could, you need to prove that the drugs they have on them were purchased in Canada.

Foreigners who currently pay a huge amount of money would only have to make one trip to Canada in however long period it takes for the drugs to expire. I know I would certainly make a day trip if I was using this drug.

Intellectual property law firms offer services to renew and watch registrations like this worldwide and it would have been very simple to have a contract with one of them.

tavavex•29m ago
> Canadian pharmacies can legally sell it and Americans (and all other foreigners for that matter) traveling there can legally buy it.

Well, about that... Aren't all variants of medications like these prescription-only? And in Canada you can't fill a foreign prescription without having a local doctor sign off on it, as far as I know.

JumpCrisscross•8m ago
> you can't fill a foreign prescription without having a local doctor sign off on it

This is how medical tourism typically works.

digianarchist•1h ago
$450 CAD I believe.

US consumers would have to travel to Canada for injections which isn't practical unless you live on a border town.

It's unlikely to meet the bar for personal importation as you say.

That probably won't stop people from trying. There's already a huge market for illegal compounds and GPL-1 drugs are available alongside the usual testosterone and other steroids.

rootusrootus•1h ago
If you have a prescription from a provider in Canada, the limit for personal use is 90 days. As long as it is a legal drug in the US -- which I don't think necessarily includes that it's patented here, just that it's approved by the FDA.

> There's already a huge market for illegal compounds and GPL-1 drugs are available alongside the usual testosterone and other steroids.

The peptide and oils markets are both big, but largely separate -- the peptides folks don't seem to want to be associated with oils. Within peptides, GLP1s definitely dominate, though the other options are pretty popular. In my experience it seems like GLP1s are kind of a "gateway peptide" -- a lot of folks start with a GLP1 on the gray market, and then start to branch out and try the other options available.

digianarchist•1h ago
You're probably right. I scanned the FDA website and wasn't sure how easy it would be to meet the requirements for personal medicine importation [0].

As a Canadian national in the US I wouldn't even attempt doing this in the current political climate.

[0] https://www.fda.gov/industry/import-basics/personal-importat...

dawnerd•1h ago
Flights to Canada can be pretty cheap too. Less than the cost of one month so if you flew out every 90 days you’d still come out ahead. Practically not enough people will do this of course. Would be great for people in the border towns though.
eek2121•55m ago
I don't know about that, Canada is a beautiful country. If I were on the meds, I wouldn't hesitate to fly out for a day trip every 90 days.

Also, let's be real, anyone in the northeast could be there in a few hours driving. New York City is about 7 hours away from Ottawa, for example.

Spooky23•1h ago
We don't have laws anymore. Just pay off POTUS so he can declare cheap "fat shots" and let Kushner or Barron own the importer, and you're good.
jzebedee•1h ago
> Prof. Michael Hoffman from Toronto put me on to the Canadian Patent Database, where you can find that Novo did file a patent there for semaglutide. . .but the last time they paid the annual maintenance fee on it was 2018!

> You can even find a letter where their lawyers send a refund request for the 2017 maintenance fee ($250) because Novo apparently wanted some more time to see if they wanted to pay it.

> On the same date in 2019, the office sent a letter saying that “The fee payable to maintain the rights accorded by the above patent was not received by the prescribed due date. . .”

> By that time it was $450 with the late fee added, but that was apparently too much for Novo. They had a one year grace period to make it up, and apparently never did, so their patent lapsed in Canada. And as the Canadian authorities remind them, “Once a patent has lapsed it cannot be revived”.

Impressive failure for "the second-largest semaglutide market in the world."

eulgro•1h ago
To be honest, given the efficiency of the drug and the huge benefit it could be to society, I feel like if I had been the employee in charge of filing patents I would've more than ready to lose my job in exchange for low cost general availability in the US via (illegal maybe, whatever) cross-border market. It's a nice loop hole and a great thing that once the delay expired they can't file ever again.

One's got to find ways to feel like the good guy when working for Big Pharma . That's probably not what happened but it's nice imagining it.

Vinnl•1h ago
Maybe they'd even do it in exchange for just low-cost general availability in Canada!
0cf8612b2e1e•1h ago
I always wonder-in this case of such an epic company fuck up, does anyone ever get fired? Or is responsibility so diffuse that nobody is ultimately responsible?

Pharma companies are really nothing more than holders of time-limited, expensive, exclusive IP. The number one priority should be to maintain those protections as long as possible. How could any patent be allowed to lapse, even if there was limited commercial value, let alone, a blockbuster drug making billions?

ionwake•1h ago
after working in many companies for decades I can guarantee that the person responsible is some middle manager, who will just blame one of her/his workers who had that piece of work "deprioritised" to instead focus on the styling of a spreadsheet. The paper trail will point to the manager, who will just claim it was allocated to a problem character.

The cartharsis comes in knowing that them firing the innocent just keeps them repeating the mistake.

userbinator•1h ago
Or is responsibility so diffuse that nobody is ultimately responsible?

That's exactly how things like this happen. No one has responsibility, thinking it's someone else's problem, so no one bothers to do the needful.

JumpCrisscross•24m ago
> thinking it's someone else's problem, so no one bothers to do the needful

Or it’s in someone’s political interest to let the fuckup play out.

bawolff•1h ago
Typically when people get fired for something like this they are just the scapegoat.

A failure like this isn't just one dude forgetting, its a system failure where policies and checks failed. If it is solely up to one person that is a failure in and of itself.

gpt5•1h ago
Canadian manufacturers (Sandoz and Apotex) are preparing to launch their own generic versions in early 2026.

I bet many Americans would travel to Canada to buy it there (despite the legality concerns). The medications lasts 2 years in a refrigerator.

rootusrootus•1h ago
If you're going to go for a two year supply, it's probably better to just risk shipping it. You're not going to come home with that much without it getting confiscated, and you're way more likely to be searched individually than a typical package is.
themafia•1h ago
You should be able to travel with a 90 day supply without issue.
daniel_iversen•1h ago
Not an American but there’s only very limited circumstances you can travel across the border home to the USA with foreign prescription drugs, right? And this scenario wouldn’t cover it. Unless you just meant they won’t get caught or maybe not fined or confiscated in practice? :)
toomuchtodo•44m ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45638316
valicord•20m ago
That's mainly for visitors. If you're a US resident, you can't just buy medicines abroad, unless of course we are talking about the "they won’t get caught" scenario.
c2h5oh•41m ago
With de minimis for US-bound packages suspended I suspect way more packages are inspected than used to be.
JumpCrisscross•23m ago
> With de minimis for US-bound packages suspended I suspect way more packages are inspected than used to be

But a smaller fraction.

If you’re paranoid, route it via the UAE. All my European and Indian shippers are doing that for tariff-free pricing. (Personal stuff. I’ll pay a customs duty if I get it, of course.)

AnimalMuppet•1h ago
Um, what are the legality concerns? Is it illegal to bring medicine for your own use over the border? If not that, then what?

(Honest question. I don't know.)

ano-ther•1h ago
https://www.fda.gov/industry/import-basics/personal-importat...
jacobgorm•1h ago
Just don’t do it in a speed boat.
stevehawk•1h ago
the shelf life is probably longer than that if you buy it in dehydrated form and don't hydrate it (but i have no idea)
ReptileMan•16m ago
So cocaine from the south, ozempic from the north, fetanyl from the west and the meth is homegrown. So USA just need some powder from europe to close the circle.
gus_massa•9m ago
I guess you get more shelf life, but it's an injectable drug.

You probably have to disolve it in very clean water in a very clean container. Do you have to match the salinity and pH with the proprties of the blood? How much time must you stir it to ensure it's completely disolved? Do you have to add something to increase/reduce viscosity? Some alcohol in case there are a few bacterias or improve solubility? How long does the small homemade batch last in the fridge?

IIUC there is another version in pills, they may have a longer shelf life, or not. But ask a medical doctor before taking a ramdom medicine.

reaperducer•11m ago
I bet many Americans would travel to Canada to buy it there

Why travel? There are thousands of ads on TV, radio, and the internet each day for Canadian pharmacies that promise to ship whatever you need to the U.S.

ChrisMarshallNY•1h ago
I totally believe this happened.

If anyone has worked in a big, hidebound corporation, they are familiar with the "That's not my job" quandary.

general1465•56m ago
This is impressive feat of bean counting. To save few thousand dollars, they lost market of few billion dollars. Good job.
bstsb•1h ago
looking at the filing, they had their patent deadline extended due to COVID-19 eighteen times!

https://brevets-patents.ic.gc.ca/opic-cipo/cpd/eng/patent/26...

choffman•1h ago
There's about to be a lot of skinny people in Canada bordering states. :)
rahimnathwani•1h ago
AIUI, because they let the patent expire, the drug was not subject to price regulation by the government. So they could charge whatever.

And during most of that time, they were still protected by 'data exclusivity' which means that any generic producer could not get approved without doing their own clinical trials, until 8 years had passed.

So they gave up some period of exclusivity in return for being able to charge a higher price when they still had a monopoly.

Emphere•43m ago
Thanks, can you point to where you found this info?
rahimnathwani•35m ago
Sorry, pieced together from different sources.

I am not an expert.

Here's one about the price control on patented drugs: https://www.torys.com/our-latest-thinking/publications/2024/...

malshe•25m ago
See the comments on that article where a few people have pointed this out.
TMWNN•1h ago
Quoting myself <https://np.reddit.com/r/MapPorn/comments/1md4wde/the_most_va...>:

>Novo Nordisk did not file for a renewal because of a mistake, or someone going on vacation, or anything like that.

>Novo Nordisk decided that the additional years of patent protection were not worth it compared to the advantage of the drug no longer being under the jurisdiction of the PMPRB <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patented_Medicine_Prices_Revie...>. Whether that decision was financially correct in light of GLP-1's subsequent application to weight loss, I do not know. However, again, it was not a silly mistake on Novo Nordisk's part.

0cf8612b2e1e•1h ago
I had never considered it-what makes a drug prescription vs OTC? Every substance has safety concerns(dose makes the poison), so with a lot of the financial gone, will the GLPs ever not require a prescription?
dlcarrier•41m ago
In the US, prescription and OTC are theoretically completely unrelated, but in practice patent holders want their drugs to be prescription, where end users aren't involved in the process of selecting or paying for the drug, whereas generic manufacturers want the drugs to be OTC, where end users are choosing the product in a competitive market.

See, for example, Prilosec (Omeprazole) switching from prescription to OTC.

apike•40m ago
The FDA (or equivalent in the relevant country) regulates whether an approved drug requires a prescription based on the safety profile. To be approved for OTC, there is a much higher bar in terms of ease of misuse, side effects, and so on.
vitorgrs•1h ago
In Brazil it will expire in July 2026. It's pretty relevant as it's kinda already announced they will put the generics on the public health care (SUS) for free... Which is big deal as an Ozempic shot costs almost the same as the minimum wage.

This year they already did an analysis to include Ozempic, but it was denied, probably because of the cost difference...

But they were trying on justice to extend the patent...

glp1guide•1h ago
Not only that, there is a legitimate raft of companies lining up to make generics.

There’s one wrinkle though, legally importing prescription drugs from Canada isn’t really allowed in the US/UK AFAIK. HIMS is probably feverishly figuring out how to do that right now.

Shameless plug:

https://glp1guide.substack.com/p/another-glp1-generic-launch...

Also somewhat separately, injectable GLP1s are about to be upstaged by oral variants — orfoglipron for Eli Lilly and the Wegovy Pill for Novo.

ChrisMarshallNY•1h ago
> Also somewhat separately, injectable GLP1s are about to be upstaged by oral variants — orfoglipron for Eli Lilly and the Wegovy Pill for Novo.

I believe that this gets a new patent, and will probably be a huge seller.

alister•1h ago
> Interviewer at Endpoints: You plan to potentially launch a generic GLP-1 in Canada and Brazil in 2026.

Looking at the original interview on Endpoints, Sandoz CEO Richard Saynor says this about Brazil:

In Brazil, the biggest prescribers are dentists. Everyone says, “Why dentists?” They do aesthetic work, and then you have your Botox, and then you want a bikini body. It’s behaving like an OTC consumer brand. Imagine selling this, rather than $300, at $50. Anybody over the age of 40 in Brazil will probably want to be on that.

But he doesn't explain how they got around the patents. Another comment on HN says they expire in July 2026, but can anyone explain why the patents expire so soon in Brazil?

pogue•28m ago
It sounds like people will be flocking to Canada to fill their ozempic prescriptions. However, the WP just posted this article about how ordering rx meds from Canada has become unaffordable due to tariffs.

Many seniors get cheaper medicine from Canada. That might become harder https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2025/10/18/deminimis...

No paywall: https://archive.ph/nT0Jl

tavavex•26m ago
The whole story seems utterly insane to me. The fact that Novo Nordisk went back to ask for a refund of $250 they paid for the patent in 2017 shows that there was active intent behind this, this wasn't just some internal disconnect between payment systems that prevented the money from being sent to the government. Who at NN thought that saving, what, ~$1000 total was justified for this? I thought companies of this scale didn't even think on the scale of thousands of dollars anymore.

Oh well, at least we in Canada get more generic drug variants. Thanks!

tempestn•12m ago
Insane to the point that it doesn't seem believable. Even if the patent was worthless it wouldn't have been worth their time to pursue that refund just for the $250.

Another comment here mentioned that patents in Canada come with strings on pricing. So it's possible there was an actual trade-off that was considered here.